Skip to main content

Investigations on Meta Review Generation from Peer Review Texts Leveraging Relevant Sub-tasks in the Peer Review Pipeline

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13541))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the ever-increasing number of submissions in top-tier conferences and journals, finding good reviewers and meta-reviewers is becoming increasingly difficult. Writing a meta-review is not straightforward as it involves a series of sub-tasks, including making a decision on the paper based on the reviewer’s recommendation and their confidence in the recommendation, mitigating disagreements among the reviewers, etc. In this work, we develop a novel approach to automatically generate meta-reviews that are decision-aware and which also take into account a set of relevant sub-tasks in the peer-review process. Our initial pipelined approach for automatic decision-aware meta-review generation achieves significant performance improvement over the standard summarization baselines and relevant prior works on this problem. We make our codes available at https://github.com/saprativa/seq-to-seq-decision-aware-mrg.

A. Kumar and T. Ghosal—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://openreview.net/.

  2. 2.

    https://huggingface.co/transformers/model_doc/bart.html.

  3. 3.

    https://huggingface.co/.

References

  1. Bharti, P.K., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., Ekbal, A.: BetterPR: a dataset for estimating the constructiveness of peer review comments. In: Silvello, G., et al. (eds.) Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2022. LNCS, vol. 13541, pp. xx–yy. Springer, Cham (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bharti, P.K., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., Ekbal, A.: How confident was your reviewer? Estimating reviewer confidence from peer review texts. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems, pp. 126–139. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bharti, P.K., Kumar, A., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., Ekbal, A.: Can a machine generate a meta-review? How far are we? In: Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD). Springer, Cham (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bharti, P.K., Ranjan, S., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., Ekbal, A.: PEERAssist: leveraging on paper-review interactions to predict peer review decisions. In: Ke, H.-R., Lee, C.S., Sugiyama, K. (eds.) ICADL 2021. LNCS, vol. 13133, pp. 421–435. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91669-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatia, C., Pradhan, T., Pal, S.: MetaGen: an academic meta-review generation system. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1653–1656 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Britto, B.K., Khandelwal, A.: Resolving the scope of speculation and negation using transformer-based architectures. CoRR abs/2001.02885 (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02885

  7. Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Burstein, J., Doran, C., Solorio, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2–7 June 2019, (Long and Short Papers), vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423

  8. Dong, L., et al.: Unified language model pre-training for natural language understanding and generation. In: Wallach, H.M., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d’Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E.B., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019, pp. 13042–13054 (2019). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/c20bb2d9a50d5ac1f713f8b34d9aac5a-Abstract.html

  9. Ghosal, T.: Exploring the implications of artificial intelligence in various aspects of scholarly peer review. Bull. IEEE Tech. Comm. Digit. Libr. 15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosal, T., Kumar, S., Bharti, P.K., Ekbal, A.: Peer review analyze: a novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews. PLoS ONE 17(1), e0259238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259238

  11. Ghosal, T., Varanasi, K.K., Kordoni, V.: HedgePeer: a dataset for uncertainty detection in peer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2022. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3529372.3533300

  12. Ghosal, T., Verma, R., Ekbal, A., Bhattacharyya, P.: DeepSentiPeer: harnessing sentiment in review texts to recommend peer review decisions. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1120–1130 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosal, T., Verma, R., Ekbal, A., Bhattacharyya, P.: A sentiment augmented deep architecture to predict peer review outcomes. In: 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 414–415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2019.00096

  14. Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.: VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Adar, E., Resnick, P., Choudhury, M.D., Hogan, B., Oh, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1–4 June 2014. The AAAI Press (2014). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8109

  15. Joshi, D.J., Kulkarni, A., Pande, R., Kulkarni, I., Patil, S., Saini, N.: Conference paper acceptance prediction: using machine learning. In: Swain, D., Pattnaik, P.K., Athawale, T. (eds.) Machine Learning and Information Processing. AISC, vol. 1311, pp. 143–152. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4859-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, D., et al.: A dataset of peer reviews (PeerRead): collection, insights and NLP applications. In: Walker, M.A., Ji, H., Stent, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2018, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 1–6 June 2018, (Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 1647–1661. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-1149

  17. Konstantinova, N., de Sousa, S.C.M., Díaz, N.P.C., López, M.J.M., Taboada, M., Mitkov, R.: A review corpus annotated for negation, speculation and their scope. In: Calzolari, N., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, 23–25 May 2012, pp. 3190–3195. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2012). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/summaries/533.html

  18. Kumar, A., Ghosal, T., Ekbal, A.: A deep neural architecture for decision-aware meta-review generation. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 222–225. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar, S., Arora, H., Ghosal, T., Ekbal, A.: DeepASPeer: towards an aspect-level sentiment controllable framework for decision prediction from academic peer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2022. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3529372.3530937

  20. Kumar, S., Ghosal, T., Bharti, P.K., Ekbal, A.: Sharing is caring! joint multitask learning helps aspect-category extraction and sentiment detection in scientific peer reviews. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 270–273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL52503.2021.00081

  21. Lewis, M., et al.: BART: denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In: Jurafsky, D., Chai, J., Schluter, N., Tetreault, J.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, 5–10 July 2020, pp. 7871–7880. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703

  22. Libovický, J., Helcl, J., Marecek, D.: Input combination strategies for multi-source transformer decoder. In: Bojar, O., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers, WMT 2018, Belgium, Brussels, 31 October–1 November 2018, pp. 253–260. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-6326

  23. Lin, C.Y.: ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text Summarization Branches Out, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 74–81. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004). https://aclanthology.org/W04-1013

  24. Liu, Y., et al.: Roberta: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. CoRR abs/1907.11692 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692

  25. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311–318 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peyrard, M., Botschen, T., Gurevych, I.: Learning to score system summaries for better content selection evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization, pp. 74–84 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Szarvas, G., Vincze, V., Farkas, R., Csirik, J.: The bioscope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pp. 38–45 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verma, R., Shinde, K., Arora, H., Ghosal, T.: Attend to Your Review: a deep neural network to extract aspects from peer reviews. In: Mantoro, T., Lee, M., Ayu, M.A., Wong, K.W., Hidayanto, A.N. (eds.) ICONIP 2021. CCIS, vol. 1517, pp. 761–768. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R.R., Le, Q.V.: XLNet: generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Saleh, M., Liu, P.: Pegasus: pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 11328–11339. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K.Q., Artzi, Y.: BERTScore: evaluating text generation with BERT. In: 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 26–30 April 2020. OpenReview.net (2020). https://openreview.net/forum?id=SkeHuCVFDr

Download references

Acknowledgements

Tirthankar Ghosal is funded by Cactus Communications, India (Award # CAC-2021-01) to carry out this research. Asif Ekbal receives the Visvesvaraya Young Faculty Award, thanks to the Digital India Corporation, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India for funding him in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saprativa Bhattacharjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, A., Ghosal, T., Bhattacharjee, S., Ekbal, A. (2022). Investigations on Meta Review Generation from Peer Review Texts Leveraging Relevant Sub-tasks in the Peer Review Pipeline. In: Silvello, G., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16802-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics