Skip to main content

Towards Interpreting Vulnerability of Object Detection Models via Adversarial Distillation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Applied Cryptography and Network Security Workshops (ACNS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13285))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1054 Accesses

Abstract

Recent works have shown that deep learning models are highly vulnerable to adversarial examples, limiting the application of deep learning in security-critical systems. This paper aims to interpret the vulnerability of deep learning models to adversarial examples. We propose adversarial distillation to illustrate that adversarial examples are generalizable data features. Deep learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples because models do not learn this data distribution. More specifically, we obtain adversarial features by introducing a generation and extraction mechanism. The generation mechanism generates adversarial examples, which mislead the source model trained on the original clean samples. The extraction term removes the original features and selects valid and generalizable adversarial features. Valuable adversarial features guide the model to learn the data distribution of adversarial examples and realize the model’s generalization on the adversarial dataset. Extensive experimental evaluations have proved the excellent generalization performance of the adversarial distillation model. Compared with the normally trained model, the mAP has increased by 2.17% on their respective test sets, while the mAP on the opponent’s test set is very low. The experimental results further prove that adversarial examples are also generalizable data features, which obeys a different data distribution from the clean data. Understanding why deep learning models are not robust to adversarial samples is helpful to attain interpretable and robust deep learning models. Robust models are essential for users to trust models and interact with the models, which can promote the application of deep learning in security-sensitive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/Adamdad/keras-YOLOv3-mobilenet.

References

  1. Biggio, B., et al.: Evasion attacks against machine learning at test time. In: Blockeel, H., Kersting, K., Nijssen, S., Železný, F. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8190, pp. 387–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40994-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bubeck, S., Lee, Y.T., Price, E., Razenshteyn, I.: Adversarial examples from computational constraints. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 831–840. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Adversarial examples are not easily detected: bypassing ten detection methods. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security, pp. 3–14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 39–57 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, X., Rao, Z., Chen, Y., Zhang, Q.: Explaining knowledge distillation by quantifying the knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12925–12935 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chow, K.H., Liu, L., Gursoy, M.E., Truex, S., Wei, W., Wu, Y.: TOG: targeted adversarial objectness gradient attacks on real-time object detection systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04320 (2020)

  7. Chow, K.-H., Liu, L., Gursoy, M.E., Truex, S., Wei, W., Wu, Y.: Understanding object detection through an adversarial lens. In: Chen, L., Li, N., Liang, K., Schneider, S. (eds.) ESORICS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12309, pp. 460–481. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59013-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilmer, J., et al.: Adversarial spheres. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02774 (2018)

  9. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580–587 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., Dean, J.: Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. Comput. Sci. 14(7), 38–39 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, L., et al.: OpenSARShip: a dataset dedicated to sentinel-1 ship interpretation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 11(1), 195–208 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ilyas, A., Santurkar, S., Engstrom, L., Tran, B., Madry, A.: Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features. In: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, J., Qu, C., Shao, J.: Ship detection in SAR images based on an improved faster R-CNN. In: 2017 SAR in Big Data Era: Models, Methods and Applications (BIGSARDATA), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, W., et al.: SSD: single shot multibox detector. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9905, pp. 21–37. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Y., Chen, X., Liu, C., Song, D.: Delving into transferable adversarial examples and black-box attacks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mądry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., Vladu, A.: Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. Stat 1050, 9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mahloujifar, S., Diochnos, D.I., Mahmoody, M.: The curse of concentration in robust learning: Evasion and poisoning attacks from concentration of measure. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 4536–4543 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z.B., Swami, A.: Practical black-box attacks against deep learning systems using adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02697 (2016)

  20. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Wu, X., Jha, S., Swami, A.: Distillation as a defense to adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 582–597. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., Farhadi, A.: You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 779–788 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Redmon, J., Farhadi, A.: YOLOv3: an incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 (2018)

  23. Russakovsky, O., et al.: ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 115(3), 211–252 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, L., Santurkar, S., Tsipras, D., Talwar, K., Madry, A.: Adversarially robust generalization requires more data. Advances Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shafahi, A., Huang, W.R., Studer, C., Feizi, S., Goldstein, T.: Are adversarial examples inevitable? In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Song, D., et al.: Physical adversarial examples for object detectors. In: 12th USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies (WOOT 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Szegedy, C., et al.: Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, H.: Combining a single shot multibox detector with transfer learning for ship detection using sentinel-1 SAR images. Remote Sens. Lett. 9(8), 780–788 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Wei, S.: A SAR dataset of ship detection for deep learning under complex backgrounds. Remote Sens. 11(7), 765 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei, X., Liang, S., Chen, N., Cao, X.: Transferable adversarial attacks for image and video object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12641 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (No. 61876019, 62072037, U1936218).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianxin Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y. et al. (2022). Towards Interpreting Vulnerability of Object Detection Models via Adversarial Distillation. In: Zhou, J., et al. Applied Cryptography and Network Security Workshops. ACNS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13285. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16815-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16815-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16814-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16815-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics