Skip to main content

Prediction of Kidney Transplant Function with Machine Learning from Computational Ultrasound Features

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simplifying Medical Ultrasound (ASMUS 2022)

Abstract

Prognosis of kidney function in post-transplant patients is important when considering invasive investigations, intervention, or re-transplantation. Ultrasound imaging is a non-invasive tool that may contain subtle textures associated with kidney function. To address this, we developed a prediction model utilizing machine learning and computational image features to predict decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a key measure of kidney function. Post-transplant ultrasound scans and eGFR values from N = 819 transplant patients were obtained. A multi-stage pipeline was built to first automatically segment the cortex, medulla, and central echo complex from ultrasound. Imaging features (104 total) related to shape, intensity statistics, texture and ultrasound speckle were computed. A random forest (RF) classifier was trained topredict 5-year eGFR decline from the feature set. For comparison, validation was repeated with using only clinical variables and with the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE). Predictive features were identified by feature-wise decrease in impurity and a mean validation AUC (\(\pm \) standard deviation) of 0.81 \(\pm \) 0.03 was achieved. Comparison AUCs were 0.62 \(\pm \) 0.04 for the clinical variable model and 0.67 \(\pm \) 0.03 for the KFRE model. 2-dimensional elongation, cluster shade, and Nakagami speckle shape were the most predictive features. This study provides support that computational image features combined with machine learning may potentially serve as a non-invasive eGFR decline prediction tool to aid post-transplant care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wolfe, R.A., et al.: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. New England J. Med. 341(23), 1725–1730 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramspek, C.L., Jong, Y., Dekker, F., Diepen, M.: Towards the best kidney failure prediction tool: a systematic review and selection aid. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 35(9), 1527–1538 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tangri, N., et al.: A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA 305(15), 1553–1559 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tangri, N., et al.: Validation of the kidney failure risk equation in kidney transplant recipients. Can. J. Kidney Health Dis. 7, 2054358120922627 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharfuddin, A.: Renal relevant radiology: imaging in kidney transplantation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9(2), 416–429 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singla, R., Kadatz, M., Rohling, R., Nguan, C.: Kidney ultrasound for the nephrologist: a review. Kidney Med. 4(6), 100464 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Araujo, N.C., Rebela, M.A.P., Lilimar da Silveira, R., Suassuna, J.H.R.: Sonographically determined kidney measurements are better able to predict histological changes and a low CKD-EPI eGFR when weighted towards cortical echogenicity. BMC Nephrol. 21(1), 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brattain, L.J., Telfer, B.A., Dhyani, M., Grajo, J.R., Samir, A.E.: Machine learning for medical ultrasound: status, methods, and future opportunities. Abdom. Radiol. 43(4), 786–799 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Jesus-Rodriguez, H.J., Morgan, M.A., Sagreiya, H.: Deep learning in kidney ultrasound: overview, frontiers, and challenges. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 28(3), 262–269 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo, C.C., et al.: Automation of the kidney function prediction and classification through ultrasound-based kidney imaging using deep learning. NPJ Digital Med. 2(1), 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R.K.G., Togashi, K.: Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9(4), 611–629 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song, J., Yin, Y., Wang, H., Chang, Z., Liu, Z., Cui, L.: A review of original articles published in the emerging field of radiomics. Eur. J. Radiol. 127, 108991 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bandara, M.S., Gurunayaka, B., Lakraj, G., Pallewatte, A., Siribaddana, S., Wansapura, J.: Ultrasound based radiomics features of chronic kidney disease. Acad. Radiol. 29(2), 786–799 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Destrempes, F., Cloutier, G.: A critical review and uniformized representation of statistical distributions modeling the ultrasound echo envelope. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 367, 1037–1051 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singla, R., et al.: The open kidney ultrasound data set. arxiv:2206.06657

  16. Clayton, P.A., Lim, W.H., Wong, G., Chadban, S.J.: Relationship between eGFR decline and hard outcomes after kidney transplants. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2711, 3440–3446 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 203–211 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singla, R., et al.: Speckle and shadows: ultrasound-specific physics-based data augmentation applied to kidney segmentation. In: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=E_KsfOoVf9D

  19. van Griethysen, J.J.M., et al.: Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Can. Res. 77(21), e104–e107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsui, P.H., et al.: Ultrasonic Nakagami imaging: a strategy to visualize the scatterer properties of benign and malignant breast tumors. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36(2), 209–217 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kolar, R., Jirik, R., Jan, J.: Estimator comparison of the Nakagami-m parameter and its application in echocardiography. Radioengineering 13(1), 8–12 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salmeron, R., Garcıa, C.B., Garcıa, J.: Variance inflation factor and condition number in multiple linear regression. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 88(12), 2365–2384 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Vergara, J.R., Estévez, P.A.: A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information. Neural Comput. Appl. 24(1), 175–186 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., Martínez-Muñoz, G.: A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54(3), 1135–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricky Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hu, R. et al. (2022). Prediction of Kidney Transplant Function with Machine Learning from Computational Ultrasound Features. In: Aylward, S., Noble, J.A., Hu, Y., Lee, SL., Baum, Z., Min, Z. (eds) Simplifying Medical Ultrasound. ASMUS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13565. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16902-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16902-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16901-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16902-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics