Skip to main content

Repeatability of Radiomic Features Against Simulated Scanning Position Stochasticity Across Imaging Modalities and Cancer Subtypes: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study on Head-and-Neck Cases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Mathematics Modeling in Cancer Analysis (CMMCA 2022)

Abstract

We attempted to investigate the Radiomic feature (RF) repeatability and its agreements across imaging modalities and head-and-neck cancer (HNC) subtypes via image perturbations. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), CET1-weight, T2-weight magnetic resonance images of 231 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, and CECT images of 399 oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients were retrospectively analyzed. Randomized translation and rotation were implemented to the images for mimicking scanning position stochasticity. 1288 RFs from unfiltered, Laplacian-of-Gaussian-filtered (LoG), and wavelet-filtered images were subsequently computed per perturbed image. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess RF repeatability. The mean absolute difference (MAD) of the ICC and the binarized repeatability consistency between image sets were adopted to evaluate its agreements across imaging modalities and HNC subtypes. Bias from feature collinearity was also investigated. All the shape RFs and the majority of RFs from unfiltered (\(\ge \)83.5%) and LoG-filtered (\(\ge \)93%) images showed high repeatability (ICC \(\ge \) 0.9) in all studied datasets, whereas more than 50% of the wavelet-filtered RFs had low repeatability (ICC < 0.9). RF repeatability agreements between imaging modalities within the NPC cohort were outstanding (MAD < 0.05, consistency > 0.9) and slightly higher between the NPC and OPC cohort (MAD = 0.06, consistency = 0.89). Minimum bias from feature collinearity was observed. We urge caution when handling wavelet-filtered RFs and advise taking initiatives to exclude underperforming RFs during feature pre-selection for robust model construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beare, R., Lowekamp, B., Yaniv, Z.: Image segmentation, registration and characterization in R with SimpleiTK. J. Stat. Softw. 86(1), 1–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v086.i08

  2. Bianchini, L., et al.: A multicenter study on radiomic features from T2-weighted images of a customized MR pelvic phantom setting the basis for robust radiomic models in clinics. Magn. Reson. Med. 00, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dehing-Oberije, C., et al.: Tumor volume combined with number of positive lymph node stations is a more important prognostic factor than TNM stage for survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 70(4), 1039–1044 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2323

  4. Elshafeey, N., et al.: Multicenter study demonstrates radiomic features derived from magnetic resonance perfusion images identify pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 3170 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11007-0

  5. Fiset, S., et al.: Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI-based radiomic features in cervical cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 135, 107–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.001

  6. Gourtsoyianni, S., et al.: Primary rectal cancer: repeatability of global and local-regional MR imaging texture features. Radiology 284(2), 552–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161375

  7. Griethuysen, V.J.J.M., et al.: Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 77(21), e104–e107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339

  8. Lambin, P., et al.: Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14(12), 749–762 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141

  9. Liu, R., et al.: Stability analysis of CT radiomic features with respect to segmentation variation in oropharyngeal cancer. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 21, 11–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.11.005

  10. Lu, H., et al.: Repeatability of quantitative imaging features in prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Oncol. 10, 551 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGraw, K.O., Wong, S.P.: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol. Methods 1(1), 30–46 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nie, K., et al.: NCTN assessment on current applications of radiomics in oncology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 104(2), 302–315 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.087

  13. Park, J.E., Park, S.Y., Kim, H.J., Kim, H.S.: Reproducibility and generalizability in radiomics modeling: possible strategies in radiologic and statistical perspectives. Korean J. Radiol. 20(7), 1124–1137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0070

  14. Schwier, M., et al.: Repeatability of multiparametric prostate MRI radiomics features. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9441 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45766-z

  15. Sheikh, K., et al.: Predicting acute radiation induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer using MR and CT radiomics of parotid and submandibular glands. Radiat. Oncol. 14(1), 131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1339-4

  16. Traverso, A., Wee, L., Dekker, A., Gillies, R.: Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 102(4), 1143–1158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.053

  17. van Velden, F.H.P., et al.: Repeatability of radiomic features in non-small-cell lung cancer [18F]FDG-PET/CT studies: impact of reconstruction and delineation. Mol. Imag. Biol. 18(5), 788–795 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0940-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, G., He, L., Yuan, C., Huang, Y., Liu, Z., Liang, C.: Pretreatment MR imaging radiomics signatures for response prediction to induction chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur. J. Radiol. 98, 100–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.11.007

  19. Zhang, L., et al.: Radiomic nomogram: pretreatment evaluation of local recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on MR imaging. J. Cancer 10(18), 4217–4225 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.33345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, L.L., et al.: Pretreatment MRI radiomics analysis allows for reliable prediction of local recurrence in non-metastatic T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. EBioMedicine 42, 270–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.050

  21. Zwanenburg, A., et al.: Assessing robustness of radiomic features by image perturbation. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 614 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36938-4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A 6 Appendix

A 6 Appendix

Table 2. Image preprocessing and feature extraction parameters.
Table 3. Distribution of low repeatability radiomics feature across different imaging modalities and HNC subtypes
Table 4. Repeatability of wavelet feature used as final selected features in previous literature. Feature repeatabibilty was quantified as intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Low repeatable RFs were marked by star (*).
Fig. 5.
figure 5

Category-based binary radiomics feature repeatability separated by volume groups for (a) CECT, CET1-w MR, and T2-w MR of the NPC cohort and (b) CECT of the NPC cohort and CECT of the OPC cohort. The top figure is the histogram of the ROI volume for the NPC patient cohort, and the dashed black lines indicate the four threshold values for patient grouping.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, J. et al. (2022). Repeatability of Radiomic Features Against Simulated Scanning Position Stochasticity Across Imaging Modalities and Cancer Subtypes: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study on Head-and-Neck Cases. In: Qin, W., Zaki, N., Zhang, F., Wu, J., Yang, F. (eds) Computational Mathematics Modeling in Cancer Analysis. CMMCA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13574. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17266-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17266-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17265-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17266-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics