Abstract
Data-driven disease progression models of Alzheimer’s disease are important for clinical prediction model development, disease mechanism understanding and clinical trial design. Among them, dynamical models are particularly appealing because they are intrinsically interpretable. Most dynamical models proposed so far are consistent with a linear chain of events, inspired by the amyloid cascade hypothesis. However, it is now widely acknowledged that disease progression is not fully compatible with this conceptual model, at least in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, and more flexibility is needed to model the full spectrum of the disease. We propose a Bayesian model of the joint evolution of brain image-derived biomarkers based on explicitly modelling biomarkers’ velocities as a function of their current value and other subject characteristics. The model includes a system of ordinary differential equations to describe the biomarkers’ dynamics and sets a Gaussian process prior to the velocity field. We illustrate the model on amyloid PET SUVR and MRI-derived volumetric features from the ADNI study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
adni.loni.usc.edu.
- 2.
The MRI volumes were computed using FreeSurfer (5.1).
References
Abi Nader, C., Ayache, N., Frisoni, G.B., Robert, P., Lorenzi, M.: For the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Simulating the outcome of amyloid treatments in Alzheimer’s disease from imaging and clinical data. Brain Commun. 3(2), 1–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab091. https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/article-pdf/3/2/fcab091/38443216/fcab091.pdf
Budgeon, C., Murray, K., Turlach, B., Baker, S., Villemagne, V., Burnham, S.: For the Alzheimer’s Disease neuroimaging initiative: constructing longitudinal disease progression curves using sparse, short-term individual data with an application to Alzheimer’s disease. Stat. Med. 36(17), 2720–2734 (2017)
Donohue, M.C., et al.: Estimating long-term multivariate progression from short-term data. Alzheimer’s Dementia 10(5, Supplement), S400–S410 (2014)
Frisoni, G.B., et al.: The probabilistic model of Alzheimer disease: the amyloid hypothesis revised. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23(1), 53–66 (2022)
Herrup, K.: The case for rejecting the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Nat. Neurosci. 18(6), 794–799 (2015)
Jack, C.R., et al.: Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 12(2), 207–216 (2013)
Jack, C.R., et al.: Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 9(1), 119–128 (2010)
Jack, C.R., et al.: Age-specific and sex-specific prevalence of cerebral \(\beta \)-amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration in cognitively unimpaired individuals aged 50–95 years: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 16(6), 435–444 (2017)
Jedynak, B.M., et al.: A computational neurodegenerative disease progression score: Method and results with the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative cohort. Neuroimage 63(3), 1478–1486 (2012)
Knopman, D.S., et al.: Alzheimer Disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 7(1), 33 (2021)
Kovacs, G.G., et al.: Non-Alzheimer neurodegenerative pathologies and their combinations are more frequent than commonly believed in the elderly brain: a community-based autopsy series. Acta Neuropathol. 126(3), 365–384 (2013)
Lorenzi, M., Filippone, M., Frisoni, G.B., Alexander, D.C., Ourselin, S.: Probabilistic disease progression modeling to characterize diagnostic uncertainty: application to staging and prediction in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 190, 56–68 (2019)
Nichols, E., et al.: Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Public Health 7(2), e105–e125 (2022)
Oxtoby, N.P., Alexander, D.C.: For the EuroPOND consortium: Imaging plus x: multimodal models of neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Opinion Neurol. 30(4), 371–379 (2017)
Oxtoby, N.P., et al.: Learning imaging biomarker trajectories from noisy Alzheimer’s Disease data using a Bayesian multilevel model. In: Cardoso, M.J., Simpson, I., Arbel, T., Precup, D., Ribbens, A. (eds.) BAMBI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8677, pp. 85–94. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12289-2_8
Schiratti, J.B., Allassonnière, S., Colliot, O., Durrleman, S.: A bayesian mixed-effects model to learn trajectories of changes from repeated manifold-valued observations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(133), 1–33 (2017)
Stan Development Team: Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual, Version 2.29 (2019). https://mc-stan.org
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by INNOVIRIS (Brussels Capital Region, Belgium) under the project: ’DIMENTIA: Data governance in the development of machine learning algorithms to predict neurodegenerative disease evolution’ (BHG/2020-RDIR-2b).
The data used in preparation of this article was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bossa, M., Berenguer, A.D., Sahli, H. (2022). Non-parametric ODE-Based Disease Progression Model of Brain Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Abdulkadir, A., et al. Machine Learning in Clinical Neuroimaging. MLCN 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13596. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17899-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17899-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17898-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17899-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)