Skip to main content

When IT Service Adoption Meets Behavioral Economics: Addressing Present Bias Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2022)

Abstract

In an ideal world, IT service adoption is derived from the value it gives to the different stakeholders. However, in the real world, human behavior may induce sub-optimal decision making that raises barriers to the optimal adoption of the service. In this paper, we focus on a specific and common behavioral phenomenon – present bias – people’s tendency to prefer immediate gratification at the expense of future outcomes. We start by conceptualizing the considerations for selecting the economically-preferred IT service, from a list of alternatives. Then, we devise an approach for assessing the present values of the alternatives from the viewpoints of the various stakeholders. Lastly, we evaluate our approach using a case study of service adoption in a multinational technology enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although not a homogeneous business unit, the employees are the ones who receive and use the vehicles and thus an important stakeholder group with similar characteristics to a certain extent.

  2. 2.

    We assume matrix representations of all mappings.

  3. 3.

    β′i can be experimentally identified for each business unit. We plan to address this part in future research.

  4. 4.

    An empirical analysis on the significant impact switching costs exert on behavior may be found at [15].

References

  1. Antlová, K.: Motivation and barriers of ICT adaptation in small and medium-size enterprises (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antony, J.: Six sigma for service processes. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 12(2), 234–248 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnott, D., Gao, S.: Behavioral economics in information systems research: critical analysis and research strategies. J. Inf. Technol. 02683962211016000 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benchimol, J., Bounader, L., Kliger, D.: Present-biased households and monetary policy. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bukhsh, F.A., Bukhsh, Z.A., Daneva, M.: A systematic literature review on requirement prioritization techniques and their empirical evaluation. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 69, 103389 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chouki, M., Talea, M., Okar, C., Chroqui, R.: Barriers to information technology adoption within small and medium enterprises: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 17(01), 2050007 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferratt, T.W., Prasad, J., Dunne, E.J.: Fast and slow processes underlying theories of information technology use. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(1), 3 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’donoghue, T.: Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 40(2), 351–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(4), 1012–1023 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Green, L., Myerson, J.: A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol. Bull. 130(5), 769 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jabarin, F., Hartman, A., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Kliger, D.: Towards improvement of IT service adoption in multi-business organizations. In: Ghose, A., Horkoff, J., Silva Souza, V.E., Parsons, J., Evermann, J. (eds.) ER 2021. LNCS, vol. 13011, pp. 210–223. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahneman, D.: Thinking Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux ed. ISBN 978–0374275631 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, H.W., Kankanhalli, A.: Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS quarterly, pp. 567–582 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, M., Kliger, D., Vale, B.: Estimating switching costs: the case of banking. J. Financ. Intermediation 12(1), 25–56 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Laibson, D.: Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112(2), 443–478 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, K., Joshi, K.: Examining the use of status quo bias perspective in IS research: need for re-conceptualizing and incorporating biases. Inf. Syst. J. 27(6), 733–752 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maglio, P.P., Vargo, S.L., Caswell, N., Spohrer, J.: The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. IseB 7(4), 395–406 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nardi, J.C., et al.: A commitment-based reference ontology for services. Inf. Syst. 54, 263–288 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rad, M.S., Nilashi, M., Dahlan, H.M.: Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17(2), 361–390 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz, D.M., Gremler, D.D., Washburn, J.H., Carrión, G.C.: Service value revisited: specifying a higher-order, formative measure. J. Bus. Res. 61(12), 1278–1291 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: Trujillo, J.C., Davis, K.C., Du, X., Li, Z., Ling, T.W., Li, G., Lee, M.L. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 121–135. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Thaler, R.H., Benartzi, S.: Save more tomorrow™: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 112(S1), S164–S187 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R., Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z.: Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 17(2), 397–427 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by the Israel Science Foundation under grant agreements 1065/19.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Reinhartz-Berger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reinhartz-Berger, I., Kliger, D., Amsalem, E., Hartman, A. (2022). When IT Service Adoption Meets Behavioral Economics: Addressing Present Bias Challenges. In: Ralyté, J., Chakravarthy, S., Mohania, M., Jeusfeld, M.A., Karlapalem, K. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17994-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17995-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics