Skip to main content

Rethinking Model Representation - A Taxonomy of Advanced Information Visualization in Conceptual Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2022)

Abstract

Conceptual modeling is an integral part of computer science research and is widely adopted in industrial practices, e.g., business process and enterprise architecture management. Providing adequate and usable modeling tools is necessary for the efficient adoption of modeling languages. Meta-modeling platforms provide a rich set of functionalities and are mature in realizing state-of-the-art modeling tools. However, despite their maturity and stability, most of these platforms did not yet leverage the full extent of functionalities and the ease of exploitation and integration enabled by web technologies. Current web technologies now enable much richer, advanced opportunities for visualizing and interacting with conceptual models. However, a structured and comprehensive overview of possible information visualization techniques linked to conceptual models and modeling tools is lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by presenting a taxonomy of advanced information visualization, albeit its generic nature, applicable to conceptual modeling. We believe this taxonomy greatly benefits researchers by providing a standard frame to position their works and for method and tool engineers to spark innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/1oudgdyb0xqi6ns/taxonomy_appendix_0_3.pdf?dl=0.

  2. 2.

    yEd [online], https://www.yworks.com/products/yed, last visited: 26.04.2022.

References

  1. Bartram, L., Ho, A., Dill, J., Henigman, F.: The continuous zoom: a constrained fisheye technique for viewing and navigating large information spaces. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface and Software Technology, pp. 207–215 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baudisch, P., Good, N., Bellotti, V., Schraedley, P.: Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming. In: SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 259–266 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bork, D., Buchmann, R., Karagiannis, D.: Preserving multi-view consistency in diagrammatic knowledge representation. In: Zhang, S., Wirsing, M., Zhang, Z. (eds.) KSEM 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9403, pp. 177–182. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25159-2_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bork, D., Karagiannis, D., Pittl, B.: Systematic analysis and evaluation of visual conceptual modeling language notations. In: 2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 1–11. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bork, D., Roelens, B.: A technique for evaluating and improving the semantic transparency of modeling language notations. Softw. Syst. Model. 20(4), 939–963 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Card, S.K., Robertson, G.G., Mackinlay, J.D.: The information visualizer, an information workspace. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 181–186 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., Bederson, B.B.: A review of overview+ detail, zooming, and focus+ context interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(1), 1–31 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cockburn, A., Savage, J.: Comparing speed-dependent automatic zooming with traditional scroll, pan and zoom methods. In: Neill, E., Palanque, P., Johnson, P. (eds.) PC XVII—DS, pp. 87–102. Springer, London (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3754-2_6

  9. Frank, U., Strecker, S., Fettke, P., Vom Brocke, J., Becker, J., Sinz, E.: The research field modeling business information systems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6(1), 39–43 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frisch, M., Dachselt, R.: Visualizing offscreen elements of node-link diagrams. Inf. Vis. 12(2), 133–162 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frisch, M., Dachselt, R., Brückmann, T.: Towards seamless semantic zooming techniques for UML diagrams. In: 4th ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, pp. 207–208 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Furnas, G.W.: Generalized fisheye views. ACM Sigchi Bull. 17(4), 16–23 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gulden, J.: Recommendations for data visualizations based on gestalt patterns. In: Li, G., Yu, Y. (eds.) International Conference on Enterprise Systems, pp. 168–177 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gulden, J., Reijers, H.A., Grabis, J., Sandkuhl, K.: Toward advanced visualization techniques for conceptual modeling. In: CAiSE Forum, pp. 33–40. CiteSeer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gustafson, S.G., Irani, P.P.: Comparing visualizations for tracking off-screen moving targets. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2399–2404 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hornbæk, K., Bederson, B.B., Plaisant, C.: Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 9(4), 362–389 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Igarashi, T., Hinckley, K.: Speed-dependent automatic zooming for browsing large documents. In: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 139–148 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kagdi, H., Maletic, J.I.: Onion graphs for focus+ context views of UML class diagrams. In: International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis, pp. 80–87 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kundisch, D., Muntermann, J., Oberländer, A.M., Rau, D., Röglinger, M., Schoormann, T., Szopinski, D.: An update for taxonomy designers: methodological guidance from information systems research. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00723-x

  20. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 336–359 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reinhard, T., Meier, S., Glinz, M.: An improved fisheye zoom algorithm for visualizing and editing hierarchical models. In: Second International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization (REV 2007), p. 9. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roelens, B., Bork, D.: An evaluation of the intuitiveness of the PGA modeling language notation. In: Nurcan, S., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Soffer, P., Zdravkovic, J. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2020. LNBIP, vol. 387, pp. 395–410. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49418-6_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandkuhl, K., et al.: From expert discipline to common practice: a vision and research agenda for extending the reach of enterprise modeling. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(1), 69–80 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: The Craft of Information Visualization, pp. 364–371. Elsevier (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Silva, S.F., Catarci, T.: Visualization of linear time-oriented data: a survey. In: First International Conference on web information systems engineering, vol. 1, pp. 310–319. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S.: User interface design and evaluation. Elsevier (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ternes, B., Rosenthal, K., Strecker, S.: User interface design research for modeling tools: a literature study. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. (EMISAJ) 16, 1–4 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thabet, R., Bork, D., Boufaied, A., Lamine, E., Korbaa, O., Pingaud, H.: Risk-aware business process management using multi-view modeling: method and tool. Requir. Eng. 26(3), 371–397 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tory, M., Moller, T.: Rethinking visualization: a high-level taxonomy. In: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 151–158. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zellweger, P.T., Mackinlay, J.D., Good, L., Stefik, M., Baudisch, P.: City lights: contextual views in minimal space. In: CHI2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 838–839 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Bork .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Carlo, G., Langer, P., Bork, D. (2022). Rethinking Model Representation - A Taxonomy of Advanced Information Visualization in Conceptual Modeling. In: Ralyté, J., Chakravarthy, S., Mohania, M., Jeusfeld, M.A., Karlapalem, K. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17994-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17995-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics