Skip to main content

Equivalence Between Classical Epidemic Model and Quantum Tight-Binding Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2022, Volume 1 (FTC 2022 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 559))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The equivalence between classical epidemic model and non-dissipative and dissipative quantum tight-binding model is derived. Classical epidemic model can reproduce the quantum entanglement emerging in the case of electrostatically coupled qubits described by von-Neumann entropy both in non-dissipative and dissipative case. The obtained results shows that quantum mechanical phenomena might be almost entirely simulated by classical statistical model. It includes the quantum like entanglement and superposition of states. Therefore coupled epidemic models expressed by classical systems in terms of classical physics can be the base for possible incorporation of quantum technologies and in particular for quantum like computation and quantum like communication. The classical density matrix is derived and described by the equation of motion in terms of anticommutator. Existence of Rabi like oscillations is pointed in classical epidemic model. Furthermore the existence of Aharonov-Bohm effect in quantum systems can also be reproduced by the classical epidemic model. Every quantum system made from quantum dots and described by simplistic tight-binding model by use of position-based qubits can be effectively described by classical model with very specific structure of S matrix that has twice bigger size as it is the case of quantum matrix Hamiltonian. Obtained results partly question fundamental and unique character of quantum mechanics and are placing ontology of quantum mechanics much in the framework of classical statistical physics what can bring motivation for emergence of other fundamental theories bringing suggestion that quantum mechanical is only effective and phenomenological but not fundamental picture of reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Likharev, K.K.: Single-electron devices and their applications. Proc. IEEE 87, 606–632 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leipold, D.: Controlled Rabi Oscillations as foundation for entangled quantum aperture logic, Seminar at UC Berkley Quantum Labs (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujisawa, T., Hayashi, T., Cheong, H.D., Jeong, Y.H., Hirayama, Y.: Rotation and phase-shift operations for a charge qubit in a double quantum dot. Physica E Low-Dimensional Syst. Nanostruct. 21(2–4), 10461052 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petersson, K.D., Petta, J.R., Lu, H., Gossard, A.C.: Quantum coherence in a one-electron semiconductor charge qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 246804 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giounanlis, P., Blokhina, E., Pomorski, K., Leipold, D.R., Staszewski, R.B.: Modeling of semiconductor electrostatic qubits realized through coupled quantum dots. IEEE Access 7, 49262–49278 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bashir, I., et al.: A mixed-signal control core for a fully integrated semiconductor quantum computer system-on-chip. In: Proceedings of IEEE European Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spalek, J.: Wstep do fizyki materii skondensowanej. PWN (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaynes, E.T., Cummings, F.W.: Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc. IEEE 51(1), 89–109 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Angelakis, D.G., Mancini, S., Bose, S.: Steady state entanglement between hybrid light-matter qubits. arXiv:0711.1830 (2008)

  10. Wetterich, C.: Quantum mechanics from classical statistics. arxiv:0906.4919 (2009)

  11. Baez, J.C., Pollard, B.S.: Quantropy. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/quantropy.pdf

  12. Pomorski, K., Staszewski, R.B.: Analytical solutions for N-electron interacting system confined in graph of coupled electrostatic semiconductor and superconducting quantum dots in tight-binding model with focus on quantum information processing (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.03180

  13. Wilczek, F.: Quantum time crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacha, K., Zakrzewski, J.: Time crystals: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81(1), 016401 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pomorski, K., Giounanlis, P., Blokhina, E., Leipold, D., Staszewski, R.B.: Analytic view on coupled single-electron lines. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34(12), 125015 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pomorski, K., Staszewski, R.B.: Towards quantum internet and non-local communication in position-based qubits. AIP Conf. Proc. 2241, 020030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0011369+ arxiv:1911.02094

  17. Pomorski, K., Giounanlis, P., Blokhina, E., Leipold, D., Peczkowski, P., Staszewski, R.B.: From two types of electrostatic position-dependent semiconductor qubits to quantum universal gates and hybrid semiconductor-superconducting quantum computer. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 11054 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wolfram Mathematica. http://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/

  19. Wikipedia: Bell theorem

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pomorski, K.: Seminars on quantum technologies at YouTube channel: quantum hardware systems (2020). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bhj_ZF36APw

  21. Pomorski, K.: Analytical view on non-invasive measurement of moving charge by position dependent semiconductor qubit. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) FTC 2020. AISC, vol. 1289, pp. 31–53. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63089-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Pomorski, K.: Analytical view on tunnable electrostatic quantum swap gate in tight-binding model. arXiv:2001.02513 (2019)

  23. Pomorski, K.: Analytic view on N body interaction in electrostatic quantum gates and decoherence effects in tight-binding model. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 19(04), 2141001 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Pomorski, K.: Analytical view on N bodies interacting with quantum cavity in tight-binding model. arXiv:2008.12126 (2020)

  25. Pomorski, K., Peczkowski, P., Staszewski, R.: Analytical solutions for N interacting electron system confined in graph of coupled electrostatic semiconductor and superconducting quantum dots in tight-binding model. Cryogenics 109, 103117 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Pomorski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pomorski, K. (2023). Equivalence Between Classical Epidemic Model and Quantum Tight-Binding Model. In: Arai, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2022, Volume 1. FTC 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 559. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18461-1_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics