Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Algorithmic Biases and Fairness in Financial Services: A Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2022, Volume 1 (FTC 2022 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 559))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Artificial intelligence capabilities and machine learning algorithms have been widely used in different applications including financial services. Many financial services such as loan or credit limit approval and credit score estimation rely on automated algorithms to offer efficient and best possible services to customers. However, algorithms suffer from intentional and unintentional biases and produce unfair outcomes. This paper presents a survey of algorithmic biases and fairness in financial services. We study the sources of bias and the different instances of bias existing in the prominent areas of the financial industry. We also discuss on the detection and mitigation techniques that have been proposed, developed and used to enhance transparency and accountability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Credit score, August 2021

    Google Scholar 

  2. How america banks: Household use of banking and financial services, 2019 fdic survey, December 2021

    Google Scholar 

  3. Minority depository institutions program, December 2021

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akula, R., Garibay, I.: Audit and assurance of AI algorithms: a framework to ensure ethical algorithmic practices in artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14046 (2021)

  5. Bakelmun, A., Shoenfeld, S.J.: Open data and racial segregation: mapping the historic imprint of racial covenants and redlining on American cities. In: Hawken, S., Han, H., Pettit, C. (eds.) Open Cities | Open Data, pp. 57–83. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6605-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Federal Reserve Banks. Small business credit survey: 2021 report on employer firms (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartlett, R., Morse, A., Stanton, R., Wallace, N.: Consumer-lending discrimination in the era of fintech. Unpublished working paper. University of California, Berkeley (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhutta, N., Chang, A.C., Dettling, L.J., et al.: Disparities in wealth by race and ethnicity in the 2019 survey of consumer finances (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Broady, K.E., McComas, M., Ouazad, A.: An analysis of financial institutions in black-majority communities: black borrowers and depositors face considerable challenges in accessing banking services, March 2022

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buckley, R.P., Arner, D.W., Zetzsche, D.A., Selga, E.: The dark side of digital financial transformation: the new risks of fintech and the rise of techrisk. In: UNSW Law Research Paper (19-89) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caliskan, A., Bryson, J.J., Narayanan, A.: Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356(6334), 183–186 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Celis, L.E., Huang, L., Keswani, V., Vishnoi, N.K.: Classification with fairness constraints: a meta-algorithm with provable guarantees. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 319–328 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chakraborty, J., Majumder, S., Yu, Z., Menzies, T.: Fairway: a way to build fair ml software. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 654–665 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Federal Trade Commission, et al.: Big data: a tool for inclusion or exclusion? understanding the issues. FTC report (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Demyanyk, Y., Kolliner, D.: Peer-to-peer lending is poised to grow. Economic Trends (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Engel, K.C., McCoy, P.A.: A tale of three markets: the law and economics of predatory lending. Tex. L. Rev. 80, 1255 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fairlie, R., Robb, A., Robinson, D.T.: Black and white: access to capital among minority-owned start-ups. Manage. Sci. 68, 2377–2400 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman, B., Nissenbaum, H.: Bias in computer systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 14(3), 330–347 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frost, J.: The economic forces driving fintech adoption across countries. The technological Revolution in Financial Services: How Banks, Fintechs, and Customers win Together, pp. 70–89 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daniel James Fuchs: The dangers of human-like bias in machine-learning algorithms. Missouri S &T’s Peer Peer 2(1), 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fuster, A., Plosser, M., Schnabl, P., Vickery, J.: The role of technology in mortgage lending. Rev. Financ. Stud. 32(5), 1854–1899 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garg, P., Villasenor, J., Foggo, V.: Fairness metrics: a comparative analysis. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 3662–3666. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grother, P.J. Ngan,, M.L., Hanaoka, K.K., et al.: Face recognition vendor test part 3: demographic effects (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hassani, B.K.: Societal bias reinforcement through machine learning: a credit scoring perspective. AI Ethics 1(3), 239–247 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00026-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Howell, B.: Exploiting race and space: Concentrated subprime lending as housing discrimination. Calif. L. Rev. 94, 101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Howell, S.T., Kuchler, T., Snitkof, D., Stroebel, J., Wong, J.: Racial disparities in access to small business credit: Evidence from the paycheck protection program. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jagtiani, J., Lemieux, C.: The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending: evidence from the lendingclub consumer platform. Financ. Manage. 48(4), 1009–1029 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, K., Pasquale, F., Chapman, J.: Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and bias in finance: toward responsible innovation. Fordham L. Rev. 88, 499 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kallus, N., Mao, X., Zhou, A.: Assessing algorithmic fairness with unobserved protected class using data combination. Manage. Sci. 68(3), 1959–1981 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kamiran, F., Calders, T.: Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 33(1), 1–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H., Sakuma, J.: Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. In: Flach, P.A., De Bie, T., Cristianini, N. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7524, pp. 35–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33486-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Kurshan, E., Chen, J., Storchan, V., Shen, H.: On the current and emerging challenges of developing fair and ethical AI solutions in financial services. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.01306 (2021)

  34. Liu, X.M., Murphy, D.: A multi-faceted approach for trustworthy AI in cybersecurity. Journal of Strategic Innovation & Sustainability 15(6), 68–78 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  35. KPMG LLP. Algorithmic bias and financial services. Technical report (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell, T.M.: The need for biases in learning generalizations. Department of Computer Science, Laboratory for Computer Science Research \(\ldots \) (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Neal, M., Walsh, J.: The Potential and Limits of Black-Owned Banks. Urban Institute, Washington, DC (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. O’neil, C.: Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nizan Geslevich Packin: Consumer finance and AI: the death of second opinions? NYUJ Legis. Pub. Pol’y 22, 319 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Perry, A., Rothwell, J., Harshbarger, D.: Five-star reviews, one-star profits: the devaluation of businesses in black communities. Brookings Institutution (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Petrasic, K., Saul, B., Greig, J., Bornfreund, M., Lamberth, K.: Algorithms and bias: what lenders need to know. White & Case (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pleiss, G., Raghavan, M., Wu, F., Kleinberg, J., Weinberger, K.Q.: On fairness and calibration. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Quillian, L., Lee, J.J., Honoré, B.: Racial discrimination in the us housing and mortgage lending markets: a quantitative review of trends, 1976–2016. Race Soc. Probl. 12(1), 13–28 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rawal, A., McCoy, J., Rawat, D., Sadler, B., Amant, R.: Recent advances in trustworthy explainable artificial intelligence: status, challenges and perspectives (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rea, S.: A survey of fair and responsible machine learning and artificial intelligence: implications of consumer financial services. Available at SSRN 3527034 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Seamster, L.: Black debt, white debt. Contexts 18(1), 30–35 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Selbst, A.D., Barocas, S.: The intuitive appeal of explainable machines. SSRN Electron. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3126971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shoag, D.: The impact of fintech on discrimination in mortgage lending. Available at SSRN 3840529 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Simonite, T.: When bots teach themselves to cheat. Wired Magazine (Aug. 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ramandeep Singh. Gk digest (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Srivastava, B., Rossi, F.: Towards composable bias rating of AI services. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 284–289 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, Y., Zhou, L.: Fairness assessment for artificial intelligence in financial industry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07211 (2019)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Mastercard Inc research funds and Intel Corporation research funds at Howard University. However, any opinion, finding, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aakriti Bajracharya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bajracharya, A., Khakurel, U., Harvey, B., Rawat, D.B. (2023). Recent Advances in Algorithmic Biases and Fairness in Financial Services: A Survey. In: Arai, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2022, Volume 1. FTC 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 559. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18461-1_53

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics