Skip to main content

Communities, Gateways, and Bridges: Measuring Attention Flow in the Reddit Political Sphere

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13618))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Online social media have attracted large and vibrant communities, which shape how people interact online. Platforms such as Reddit provide a safe harbor for groups to discuss a variety of topics, including politics and even conspiracy theories. We propose a framework, dubbed attention-flow graph, to investigate the flow of users across Reddit communities from a network perspective. This graph concisely summarizes how users shift their attention from one subreddit to another over time, and allows to capture its community structure. In addition, it enables the operationalization of the concepts of gateways and bridges: particular subreddits that support the transition of users towards specific communities. We apply this framework to identify political and conspiracy communities, thus discovering their bridges and gateways. We find that conspiracy theories help attracting users to the alt-right community from occultist subreddits, but also by diverting users from the radical left.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/15/qanon-violence-crimes-timeline.

  2. 2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit.

  3. 3.

    Specifically, we use a degree-corrected version of the stochastic block model (Karrer and Newman 2011), with the addition of the degree sequence \(\boldsymbol{k}=\left\{ k_{i}\right\} \) of the graph as an additional set of parameters (Peixoto 2017).

  4. 4.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ListOfSubreddits/wiki/listofsubreddits.

References

  • Abbas, T., Somoano, I.B., Cook, J., Frens, I., Klein, G.R., McNeil-Willson, R.: The buffalo attack-an analysis of the manifesto (2022). https://icct.nl/publication/the-buffalo-attack-an-analysis-of-the-manifesto/

  • Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., Blackburn, J.: The pushshift reddit dataset. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 14, pp. 830–839 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J.M.: Is the internet causing political polarization? evidence from demographics. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A.: Gatewatching, not gatekeeping: collaborative online news. Media Int. Aust. 107(1), 31–44 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110(2), 349–399 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, B., Decker, S., Zheng, C.: The migrants of reddit: an analysis of user migration effects of subreddit bans. Preprint (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, E., Pavalanathan, U., Srinivasan, A., Glynn, A., Eisenstein, J., Gilbert, E.: You can’t stay here: the efficacy of reddit’s 2015 ban examined through hate speech. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1(CSCW), 1–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., Starnini, M.: The echo chamber effect on social media. PNAS: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(9), e2023301118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118. http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

  • Datta, S., Adar, E.: Extracting inter-community conflicts in reddit. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 13, pp. 146–157 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C., et al.: Multi-scale user migration on reddit. AAAI (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Enli, G.: Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. Eur. J. Commun. 32(1), 50–61 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri, F., Wang, Y., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., Mathioudakis, M.: Rewiring what-to-watch-next recommendations to reduce radicalization pathways. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, pp. 2719–2728 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., Mathioudakis, M.: Political discourse on social media: echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. In: WWW 2018: The Web Conference, pp. 913–922 (2018a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., Mathioudakis, M.: Quantifying controversy on social media. ACM Trans. Soc. Comput. 1(1), 3 (2018b)

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R., Shujaee, K., Kerwat, M., Felfli, Z., Gelenbe, D., Ukuwu, K.: A comparative evaluation of community detection algorithms in social networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 171, 1157–1165 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimera, R., Sales-Pardo, M., Amaral, L.A.N.: Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 70(2), 025101 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta Ribeiro, M., et al.: Do platform migrations compromise content moderation? evidence from r/the_donald and r/incels. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5(CSCW2), 1–24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G., Lelkes, Y.: Affect, not ideologya social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opin. Q. 76(3), 405–431 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, D., Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M.: Blaming a few bad apples to save a threatened barrel: the system-justifying function of conspiracy theories. Polit. Psychol. 39(2), 465–478 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.: Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 83(1), 016107 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C., Clutton, P., Dunn, A.G.: Pathways to conspiracy: the social and linguistic precursors of involvement in reddit’s conspiracy theory forum. PLoS ONE 14(11), e0225098 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubin, E., von Sikorski, C.: The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 45(3), 188–206 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Hum. Relat. 1(2), 143–153 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamié, R., Horta Ribeiro, M., West, R.: Are anti-feminist communities gateways to the far right? Evidence from reddit and Youtube. In: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, pp. 139–147 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A.E., Partin, W.C.: Constructing alternative facts: populist expertise and the QAnon conspiracy. New Media Soc. 14614448221090201 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachs, J., Monti, C., De Francisci Morales, G., Bonchi, F.: Roots of trumpism: homophily and social feedback in donald trump support on reddit. In: WebSci 2020: 12th International ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 49–58. WebSci (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neo, L.S.: An internet-mediated pathway for online radicalisation: RECRO. In: Violent Extremism: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, pp. 62–89. IGI Global (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto, T.P.: Nonparametric Bayesian inference of the microcanonical stochastic block model. Phys. Rev. E 95(1), 012317 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phadke, S., Samory, M., Mitra, T.: What makes people join conspiracy communities? Role of social factors in conspiracy engagement. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4(CSCW3), 1–30 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phadke, S., Samory, M., Mitra, T.: Pathways through conspiracy: the evolution of conspiracy radicalization through engagement in online conspiracy discussions. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 16, pp. 770–781 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., Sunstein, C.R.: Echo chambers on Facebook. Available at SSRN 2795110 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, M.H., et al.: The evolution of the manosphere across the web. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07600 (2020a)

  • Ribeiro, M.H., Ottoni, R., West, R., Almeida, V.A., Meira Jr, W.: Auditing radicalization pathways on Youtube. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 131–141 (2020b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatz, I.: Fast, free, and targeted: Reddit as a source for recruiting participants online. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 35(4), 537–549 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelley, G.: What We Know About Andrew Yang’s Base. Five Thirty Eight (2019). https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-we-know-about-andrew-yangs-base/. Accessed 18 Aug 2022

  • Stroud, N.J.: Polarization and partisan selective exposure. J. Commun. 60(3), 556–576 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, K., Wells, C.: Curated flows: a framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Commun. Theory 26(3), 309–328 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, I., Anderson, A.: Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature 600(7888), 264–268 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welbers, K., Opgenhaffen, M.: Social media gatekeeping: an analysis of the gatekeeping influence of newspapers’ public Facebook pages. New Media Soc. 20(12), 4728–4747 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S.M.: Raging against the machine: network gatekeeping and collective action on social media platforms. Media Commun. 5(3), 28–36 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M.: La Q di Qomplotto: QAnon e dintorni: come le fantasie di complotto difendono il sistema. Edizioni Alegre (2021). https://edizionialegre.it/notizie/the-q-in-conspiracy/

  • Zannettou, S., et al.: The web centipede: understanding how web communities influence each other through the lens of mainstream and alternative news sources. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 405–417 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrado Monti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix

A Weight Rescaling

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Distribution of the subreddits in the space defined by their number of monthly users and their (rescaled) node strength in the attention-flow graph, i.e., the sum of the weight of all of their links.

In order to define the weights of the links in the attention-flow graphs, we wish to focus on links that are deviating from the most popular subreddits. E.g., the constant flow of users towards a generalist subreddit such as r/pictures is not as interesting for our purposes as the flow between two topical communities. For this reason, we rescale the weight w of a link between two subreddits \((s, s')\) in order to reduce the correlation of w with the number of users of s and \(s'\). Thanks to our framework, we are able to perform such normalization using only information coming from the node weights themselves. In fact, we rescale each weight by the mean of the total weights of the links incident on the head and the tail of each link. We compare two types of means: arithmetic and geometric. Figure 4 reports this comparison, clearly showing that the geometric mean succeeds in this goal, as it dampens the dependency between the resulting subreddit node strength (i.e., the sum of the weights w of all of their links in the attention flow graph) and the number of monthly users in each subreddit.

B Pruning Thresholds

As shown in table Table 1, community detection algorithm benefits from edge pruning. In fact, the weights distribution of the attention-flow graph, plotted in Fig. 5, spans over several orders of magnitudes and the considerable amount of lightly weighted links adds a background noise in the network, which is detrimental for the community detection.

Fig. 5.
figure 5

Weights distribution of the attention-flow graph, with the investigated pruning thresholds at \(25^{th}\), \(50^{th}\) and \(75^{th}\) percentiles indicated by red vertical lines. (Color figure online)

C Mentioned Communities

In Table 4, we report the top-10 largest subreddits by userbase for all the mentioned communities: the four politicized communities of interest, and their neighboring communities mentioned in Table 5.

Table 4. Top-10 subreddits by userbase for mentioned communities.
Table 5. Top-5 communities by normalized inflow for three gateway nodes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rollo, C., De Francisci Morales, G., Monti, C., Panisson, A. (2022). Communities, Gateways, and Bridges: Measuring Attention Flow in the Reddit Political Sphere. In: Hopfgartner, F., Jaidka, K., Mayr, P., Jose, J., Breitsohl, J. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13618. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19096-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19097-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics