Skip to main content

On the Presence of Abusive Language in Mis/Disinformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13618))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The rise in mis/disinformation and abusive language online is alarming. These problems threaten society, impacting users’ mental health and even politics and democracy. Social science studies have already theorized about those problems’ mutual spread, for instance, regarding how users interact with mis/disinformation. In this work, we propose to analyze news articles’ production patterns instead of the consumption perspective, focusing on the textual news content. We perform a textual analysis of online news and conclude that false news present a higher prevalence of abusive language when compared to real news. The found patterns are consistent across datasets, even when they belong to different topics. To better understand these differences, we analyze psycholinguistic patterns of false and real news writings. Finally, we analyze which news categories are more affected by abusive language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://parler.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/brenomatos/abusive-language.

  3. 3.

    https://developers.perspectiveapi.com/s/about-the-api-attributes-and-languages.

  4. 4.

    https://huggingface.co/cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-sentiment-latest.

  5. 5.

    https://huggingface.co/datasets/Fraser/news-category-dataset.

  6. 6.

    https://www.huffpost.com/.

  7. 7.

    https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/v4.20.0/en/main_classes/pipelines#transformers.TextClassificationPipeline.

  8. 8.

    https://huggingface.co/prajjwal1/bert-tiny.

  9. 9.

    https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main_classes/trainer.

  10. 10.

    We use the Mann-Whitney U test with \(p < 0.05\).

  11. 11.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/event/kdd-2020-truefact-workshop-making-a-credible-web-for-tomorrow/shared-tasks/.

  12. 12.

    www.politifact.com.

  13. 13.

    www.gossipcop.com.

References

  1. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbieri, F., Camacho-Collados, J., Espinosa Anke, L., Neves, L.: TweetEval: unified benchmark and comparative evaluation for tweet classification. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 1644–1650. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, November 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.148, https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.148

  3. Benesch, S.: Defining and diminishing hate speech. State World’s Minorities Indigenous Peoples 2014, 18–25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bessi, A., Ferrara, E.: Social bots distort the 2016 US presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21(11-7) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blankenship, M.: How misinformation spreads through twitter (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caramancion, K.M.: Understanding the association of personal outlook in free speech regulation and the risk of being MIS/disinformed. In: 2021 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT), pp. 0092–0097 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIIoT52608.2021.9454212

  7. Cinelli, M., Pelicon, A., Mozetič, I., Quattrociocchi, W., Novak, P.K., Zollo, F.: Dynamics of online hate and misinformation. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 22083 (2021). ISSN 2045-2322, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01487-w

  8. Claussen, V.: Fighting hate speech and fake news. The network enforcement act (NETZDG) in Germany in the context of European legislation. Rivista di diritto dei media 3, 1–27 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cui, L., Lee, D.: CoAID: COVID-19 healthcare misinformation dataset (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darmstadt, A., Prinz, M., Saal, O.: The murder of Keira: misinformation and hate speech as far-right online strategies (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ezeibe, C.: Hate speech and election violence in Nigeria. J. Asian African Stud. 56(4), 919–935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620951208

  12. Giachanou, A., Rosso, P.: The battle against online harmful information: the cases of fake news and hate speech. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 3503–3504, CIKM 2020. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). ISBN 9781450368599, https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412169

  13. Hannah, M.: QAnon and the information dark age. First Monday (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, Y., Yoon, S., Jung, K.: Comparative studies of detecting abusive language on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2), pp. 101–106. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5113, https://aclanthology.org/W18-5113

  15. Lima, L., Reis, J.C., Melo, P., Murai, F., Benevenuto, F.: Characterizing (un) moderated textual data in social systems. In: ASONAM, pp. 430–434. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mathew, B., Dutt, R., Goyal, P., Mukherjee, A.: Spread of hate speech in online social media. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, WebSci 2019, pp. 173–182. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). ISBN 9781450362023, https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326034

  17. Nan, X., Wang, Y., Thier, K.: Health misinformation (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, D.Q., Vu, T., Nguyen, A.T.: BERTweet: a pre-trained language model for English Tweets. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pp. 9–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nobata, C., Tetreault, J., Thomas, A., Mehdad, Y., Chang, Y.: Abusive language detection in online user content. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2016, pp. 145–153. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE (2016). ISBN 9781450341431, https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883062

  20. Pate, U.A., Ibrahim, A.M.: Fake news, hate speech and Nigeria’s struggle for democratic consolidation: a conceptual review. In: Handbook of Research on Politics in the Computer Age, pp. 89–112 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patwa, P., et al.: Overview of CONSTRAINT 2021 shared tasks: detecting English COVID-19 fake news and Hindi hostile posts. In: Chakraborty, T., Shu, K., Bernard, H.R., Liu, H., Akhtar, M.S. (eds.) CONSTRAINT 2021. CCIS, vol. 1402, pp. 42–53. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73696-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A., Eckles, D., Rand, D.: Understanding and reducing the spread of misinformation online. ACR North American Advances (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pérez-Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., Mihalcea, R.: Automatic detection of fake news. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 3391–3401. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 2018. https://aclanthology.org/C18-1287

  24. Schmidt, A., Wiegand, M.: A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, pp. 1–10. Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain, April 2017. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-1101, https://aclanthology.org/W17-1101

  25. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G.L., Varol, O., Yang, K.C., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4787 (2018). ISSN 2041-1723, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7

  26. Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: FakeNewsNet: a data repository with news content, social context, and spatiotemporal information for studying fake news on social media. Big Data 8(3), 171–188 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sipka, A., Hannak, A., Urman, A.: Comparing the language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.11118 (2021)

  28. Sylvia Chou, W.Y., Gaysynsky, A., Cappella, J.N.: Where we go from here: health misinformation on social media (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tandoc Jr., E.C., Lim, Z.W., Ling, R.: Defining “fake news” a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism 6(2), 137–153 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1), 24–54 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, W.Y.: “Liar, Liar PANTS on Fire”: a new benchmark dataset for fake news detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00648 (2017)

  32. Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H.: Information disorder: toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zannettou, S., et al.: What is Gab: a Bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zannettou, S., Elsherief, M., Belding, E., Nilizadeh, S., Stringhini, G.: Measuring and characterizing hate speech on news websites. In: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, WebSci 2020, pp. 125–134. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). ISBN 9781450379892, https://doi.org/10.1145/3394231.3397902

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by CNPq, CAPES and Fapemig.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Breno Matos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Matos, B., Lima, R.C., Almeida, J.M., Gonçalves, M.A., Santos, R.L.T. (2022). On the Presence of Abusive Language in Mis/Disinformation. In: Hopfgartner, F., Jaidka, K., Mayr, P., Jose, J., Breitsohl, J. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13618. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19096-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19097-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics