Abstract
This article unveils existing gaps in the use of digital technologies and local languages in the context of official COVID-19 pandemic communication strategies in Uganda. It entails an analysis of a purposively drawn sample of official COVID-19 communication from the Ministry of Health through its website, notably in English and translations into few native Ugandan languages, to argue for the need for a more diverse and inclusive language strategy in pandemic containment and prevention communication strategy. Interviews were also held with a convenient sample of Ugandans from diverse ethnolinguistic and socio-demographic backgrounds to explore the way in which social distancing, a dominant strategy used in COVID-19 infection prevention control was understood by sections of the population and factors influencing their understanding, acceptance or rejection of this strategy. Discursive thematic analysis was employed to examine the ways in which important public health information and strategies aimed at controlling the spread of COVID-19 are communicated to the culturally and linguistically diverse Ugandan population. The study critically analyses the implications of the cultural interpretations and multiple meanings of strategies such as social distancing and the use of sanitizers amongst a linguistically and socio-economically diverse population. The study argues that local languages, including specialist languages such as braille and sign language play a pivotal role in spreading information and raising awareness about the current global pandemic. It highlights the need to create an inclusive, responsible and ethical mass media and internet communication and content in local Ugandan languages in addition to English which is the official language.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Badr, E.: Public health communication: some lessons for effectiveness. Sudanese J. Public Health 4(3), 313 (2009)
BBC Future: Coronavirus: Why some racial groups are more vulnerable (n.d). https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200420-coronavirus-why-some-racial-groups-are-more-vulnerable
Calisher, C., et al.: Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. Lancet 395(10226), e42–e43 (2020)
Communication in the time of covid-19 some reflections on ethics. https://www.scu.edu/ethicsspotlight/covid-19/communication-in-the-time-of-covid-19-some-reflections-on-ethics/?
Community Engagement. https://communityengagementhub.org/what-we-do/novel-coronavirus/
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novelcoronavirus-2019/advice-for-public
Betsch, C.: How behavioural science data helps mitigate the covid-19 crisis (2020)
Covello, V.: Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. J. Health Commun. 8, 5–8 (2003)
Eriksson, M.: Lessons for crisis communication on social media: a systematic review of what research tells the practice. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 12(5), 526–551 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1510405
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Guidance on community engagement for public health events caused by communicable disease threats in the EU/EEA. Stockholm: ECDC (2020)
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid risk assessment: outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): increased transmission globally – fth update. 2020. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/les/documents/RRA-outbreak-novelcoronavirus-disease-2019-increasetransmission-globally-COVID-19.pdf. Accessed 06 Apr 2020
Glik, D.C.: Risk communication for public health emergencies. Ann. Rev. Publ. Health 28(1), 33–54 (2007)
Griffin, E.: A First Look at Communication Theory, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill (2006). Health and science controversies: fresh perspectives from Covid-19. Media Commun. 8(2), 323–328
Health Crisis Communication and Post-Ebola Virus Disease Containment Era. Int. J. Crisis Commun. 4(1), 31 (2020)
Holmes, B.J., Henrich, N., Hancock, S., Lestou, V.: Communicating with the public during health crises: experts’ experiences and opinions. J. Risk Res. 12(6), 793–807 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802648486
How refugees are coping with Covid-19 lockdown, 27 April 2020. https://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/How-refugees-are-coping-with-Covid-19-lockdown/688334-5535628-2esry5z/index.html
Huremović, D.: Social distancing, quarantine, and isolation. In: Huremović, D. (ed.) Psychiatry of Pandemics, pp. 85–94. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15346-5_8
Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College, London, 16 March 2020. 2020. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperialcollege/medicine/sph/ide/gidafellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
Infodemic Management-Infodemiology. https://www.who.int/teams/risk-communication/infodemicmanagement
Lunn, P., et al.: Using behavioural science to help fight the coronavirus. ESRI Working Paper No. 656, March 2020. http://aei.pitt.edu/102644/ (2020)
Jiang, N., Ryan J.: How does digital technology help in the fight against COVID-19? (2020). https://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/how-does-digital-technology-help-fight-against-covid-19
Mian, A., Khan, S.: Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC Med. 18, 89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3
National Guidelines for Management of Covid-19. https://www.health.go.ug/covid/document/nationalguidelines-for-management-of-covid-19/
Nguyen, A., Catalan, D.: Digital mis/disinformation and public engagement with (2020)
OECD: Transparency, communication and trust: the role of public communication in responding to the wave of disinformation about the new coronavirus. OECD, Paris (2020). https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/en/#policy-responses
OECD: COVID-19 Policy Brief on Well-being and Inclusiveness (2020). http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/en/
OECD, Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World (2011)
Public Health England. Guidance on social distancing for everyone in the UK, 20 March 2020. PHE, London (2020). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-socialdistancing-and-for-vulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-andprotecting-older-people-and-vulnerable-adults
Pakenham-Walsh, N.: Improving the availability of health research in languages other than English. Lancet Glob. Health 6(12) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30384-X
Reynolds, B., Seeger, M.: Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. J. Health Commun. 10, 43–55 (2005)
Richmond, A., Myers, I., Namuli, H.: Urban informality and vulnerability: a case study in Kampala, Uganda. Urban Sci. 2, 22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2010022
Royston, G., Pakenham-Walsh, N., Zielinski, C.: Universal access to essential health information: accelerating progress towards universal health coverage and other SDG health targets. BMJ Glob. Health 2020(5), e002475 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002475
Uganda: Calls for Disability-friendly Lockdown Measures. https://globalaccessibilitynews.com/2020/04/09/uganda-calls-for-disability-friendly-lockdownmeasures/
UN-Uganda: Leaving No One Behind: From the COVID-19 Response to Recovery and Resilience-Building. An Inter-agency Report on the Analyses of the Socioeconomic Impact of COVID-19 in Uganda. Prepared by the UN-Uganda, June 2020. Kampala (2020)
UNICEF guidance on COVID-19 Response: Considerations for Children and Adults with Disabilities UNICEF informational videos. https://www.unicef.org/disabilities/index_90418.html; page 83 of UNICEF Guidance For practical tips on how activities can be modified for children with disabilities, p. 82. http://training.unicef.org/disability/emergencies/downloads/UNICEF_General_Guidance_English.pdf; and CBM Humanitarian Hands-on-Tool at https://hhot.cbm.org/en/card/communication
UNICEF Uganda: Frontline line fight against COVID-19 (2020). https://www.unicef.org/uganda/stories/front-line-fight-against-covid-19-uganda
Vijaykumar, S., et al.: How shades of truth and age affect responses to COVID-19 (mis)information: randomized survey experiment among WhatsApp users in UK and Brazil. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00752-7
WHO outbreak communication guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva (2005). WHO/CDS/2005.28. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69369/1/WHO_CDS_2005_28_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
WHO outbreak communication planning guide, 2008 edn. World Health Organization, Geneva (2008). http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44014/1/9789241597449_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
WHO: Disability considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (2020). https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019
WHO: Infodemic (n.d.). https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Atcero, M., Ayikoru, M. (2022). Digital and Language Inequalities in Disseminating COVID-19-Related Health Campaigns in Uganda: The Effects of Confinement and Social Distancing Strategies. In: Zheng, Y., Abbott, P., Robles-Flores, J.A. (eds) Freedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World. ICT4D 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 657. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19428-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19429-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
