Abstract
Since the invention of the Internet, and with the rise of social networks, information is available to all users quickly and in large quantities. One of the main sources of information on social networks is news. Among the possible options available for users to express their opinion or comment about some topic Twitter is a great tool for its users’ to express their thoughts, this makes tweets the source of data and one of the central points of this work. The content of these opinions is highly emotionally charged. By analyzing user’s comments about a news item, it is possible to determine its polarity and in turn use it as an indicator of the controversy of the news. Controversy tells us how the news affected its consumers, since if the responses are highly controversial it means that the readers opinions differed greatly, and that there was no common agreement on the news. Since there was no consensus in the responses, it can be inferred that there was a heated discussion in the comments. Those heated discussions are striking because they indicate which types of news generate more conflicts among readers and which do not.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahuja, S., Dubey, G.: Clustering and sentiment analysis on twitter data. In: 2017 2nd International Conference on Telecommunication and Networks (TEL-NET), pp. 1–5 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEL-NET.2017.8343568
Anjaria, M., Guddeti, R.M.R.: A novel sentiment analysis of social networks using supervised learning. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 4(1), 181 (2014)
Arasteh, S.T., et al.: How will your tweet be received? predicting the sentiment polarity of tweet replies. In: 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 370–373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC50631.2021.00068
Bastick, Z.: Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? an experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 116, 106633 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633
Berger, A.L., Pietra, V.J.D., Pietra, S.A.D.: A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput. Linguist. 22(1), 39–71 (1996)
Bhowmick, A.K., Sai Bharath Chandra, G., Singh, Y., Mitra, B.: Constructing influence trees from temporal sequence of retweets: an analytical approach. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 624–633 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622315
Bhowmick, P.K.: Reader perspective emotion analysis in text through ensemble based multi-label classification framework. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2(4) (2009)
Cañete, J., Chaperon, G., Fuentes, R., Ho, J.H., Kang, H., Pérez, J.: Spanish pre-trained BERT model and evaluation data. In: PML4DC at ICLR 2020 (2020)
Coletta, L.F.S., da Silva, N.F.F., Hruschka, E.R., Hruschka, E.R.: Combining classification and clustering for tweet sentiment analysis. In: 2014 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems, pp. 210–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2014.46
Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)
Gambino, J.O.J.: Sentiment polarity prediction of Twitter users’ opinions to national newspapers news. Ph.D. thesis, Centro de Investigación en Computación (2019)
Jianqiang, Z., Xiaolin, G., Xuejun, Z.: Deep convolution neural networks for twitter sentiment analysis. IEEE Access 6, 23253–23260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2776930
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, pp. 591–600. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
Li, X., Peng, Q., Sun, Z., Chai, L., Wang, Y.: Predicting social emotions from readers’ perspective. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 10(2), 255–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2695607
Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
Piech, C.: K means (2012). https://stanford.edu/cpiech/cs221/handouts/kmeans.html
Roth, C., St-Onge, J., Herms, K.: Quoting is not citing: disentangling affiliation and interaction on Twitter. In: Benito, R.M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Moro, E., Rocha, L.M., Sales-Pardo, M. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications X. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 1015. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_58
Shamrat, F.M.J.M., et al.: Sentiment analysis on twitter tweets about Covid-19 vaccines using NLP and supervised KNN classification algorithm. Indonesian J. Elec. Eng. Comput. Sci. 23(1), 463–470 (2021)
Villena-Román, J., Lana-Serrano, S., Martínez-Cámara, E., González-Cristóbal, J.C.: Tass - workshop on sentiment analysis at sepln. procesamiento del lenguaje natural, 50. https://journal.sepln.org/sepln/ojs/ojs/index.php/pln/article/view/4657 (2013)
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity: an exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 35(3), 399–433 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.08-012-R1-06-90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Macias, C., Calvo, H., Gambino, O.J. (2022). News Intention Study and Automatic Estimation of Its Impact. In: Pichardo Lagunas, O., Martínez-Miranda, J., Martínez Seis, B. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19496-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19496-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19495-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19496-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)