Skip to main content

News Intention Study and Automatic Estimation of Its Impact

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Intelligence (MICAI 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13613))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

Since the invention of the Internet, and with the rise of social networks, information is available to all users quickly and in large quantities. One of the main sources of information on social networks is news. Among the possible options available for users to express their opinion or comment about some topic Twitter is a great tool for its users’ to express their thoughts, this makes tweets the source of data and one of the central points of this work. The content of these opinions is highly emotionally charged. By analyzing user’s comments about a news item, it is possible to determine its polarity and in turn use it as an indicator of the controversy of the news. Controversy tells us how the news affected its consumers, since if the responses are highly controversial it means that the readers opinions differed greatly, and that there was no common agreement on the news. Since there was no consensus in the responses, it can be inferred that there was a heated discussion in the comments. Those heated discussions are striking because they indicate which types of news generate more conflicts among readers and which do not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-october-global-statshot.

  2. 2.

    https://developer.twitter.com.

References

  1. Ahuja, S., Dubey, G.: Clustering and sentiment analysis on twitter data. In: 2017 2nd International Conference on Telecommunication and Networks (TEL-NET), pp. 1–5 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEL-NET.2017.8343568

  2. Anjaria, M., Guddeti, R.M.R.: A novel sentiment analysis of social networks using supervised learning. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 4(1), 181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arasteh, S.T., et al.: How will your tweet be received? predicting the sentiment polarity of tweet replies. In: 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 370–373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC50631.2021.00068

  4. Bastick, Z.: Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? an experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 116, 106633 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, A.L., Pietra, V.J.D., Pietra, S.A.D.: A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput. Linguist. 22(1), 39–71 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhowmick, A.K., Sai Bharath Chandra, G., Singh, Y., Mitra, B.: Constructing influence trees from temporal sequence of retweets: an analytical approach. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 624–633 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622315

  7. Bhowmick, P.K.: Reader perspective emotion analysis in text through ensemble based multi-label classification framework. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2(4) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cañete, J., Chaperon, G., Fuentes, R., Ho, J.H., Kang, H., Pérez, J.: Spanish pre-trained BERT model and evaluation data. In: PML4DC at ICLR 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coletta, L.F.S., da Silva, N.F.F., Hruschka, E.R., Hruschka, E.R.: Combining classification and clustering for tweet sentiment analysis. In: 2014 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems, pp. 210–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2014.46

  10. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

  11. Gambino, J.O.J.: Sentiment polarity prediction of Twitter users’ opinions to national newspapers news. Ph.D. thesis, Centro de Investigación en Computación (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jianqiang, Z., Xiaolin, G., Xuejun, Z.: Deep convolution neural networks for twitter sentiment analysis. IEEE Access 6, 23253–23260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2776930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, pp. 591–600. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751

  14. Li, X., Peng, Q., Sun, Z., Chai, L., Wang, Y.: Predicting social emotions from readers’ perspective. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 10(2), 255–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2695607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Piech, C.: K means (2012). https://stanford.edu/cpiech/cs221/handouts/kmeans.html

  17. Roth, C., St-Onge, J., Herms, K.: Quoting is not citing: disentangling affiliation and interaction on Twitter. In: Benito, R.M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Moro, E., Rocha, L.M., Sales-Pardo, M. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications X. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 1015. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_58

  18. Shamrat, F.M.J.M., et al.: Sentiment analysis on twitter tweets about Covid-19 vaccines using NLP and supervised KNN classification algorithm. Indonesian J. Elec. Eng. Comput. Sci. 23(1), 463–470 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Villena-Román, J., Lana-Serrano, S., Martínez-Cámara, E., González-Cristóbal, J.C.: Tass - workshop on sentiment analysis at sepln. procesamiento del lenguaje natural, 50. https://journal.sepln.org/sepln/ojs/ojs/index.php/pln/article/view/4657 (2013)

  20. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity: an exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 35(3), 399–433 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.08-012-R1-06-90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar Macias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Macias, C., Calvo, H., Gambino, O.J. (2022). News Intention Study and Automatic Estimation of Its Impact. In: Pichardo Lagunas, O., Martínez-Miranda, J., Martínez Seis, B. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19496-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19496-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19495-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19496-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics