Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13703))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We argue that compositional specification based on formal languages can facilitate the modelling of, and reasoning about, sophisticated collective behaviour in many natural systems. One defines a system in terms of individual components and local rules, so that collective behaviours emerge naturally from the combined effect of the different actions of the individual components. With appropriate linguistic constructs, this can yield compact and intuitive models that are easy to refine and extend in small incremental steps. In addition, automated workflows implemented on top of this methodology can provide quick feedback, thereby allowing rapid design iterations. To support our argument, we consider flocking, a well-known example of emergent behaviour in collective adaptive systems. We build a minimalistic bottom-up model of a flock of birds incrementally, discussing specific language constructs as we go along. We then describe a prototype simulator, and use it to validate our model in a controlled experiment, where a flock is attacked by a bird of prey. The flock effectively reacts to the attack by splitting into smaller groups and regathering once the threat subsides, consistently with both natural observations and previous models from the literature.

Work partially funded by MIUR project PRIN 2017FTXR7S IT MATTERS (Methods and Tools for Trustworthy Smart Systems).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, we present condensed, human-readable versions of the full, machine-readable specifications. These are available at https://github.com/labs-lang/labs-examples/tree/isola2022/isola2022.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/labs-lang/sliver/.

References

  1. Antuña, L., Araiza-Illan, D., Campos, S., Eder, K.: Symmetry reduction enables model checking of more complex emergent behaviours of swarm navigation algorithms. In: Dixon, C., Tuyls, K. (eds.) TAROS 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9287, pp. 26–37. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22416-9_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballerini, M., et al.: Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(4), 1232–1237 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711437105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bialek, W., et al.: Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(13), 4786–4791 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., Dorigo, M.: Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intell. 7(1), 1–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cederman, L.E.: Endogenizing geopolitical boundaries with agent-based modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(Suppl 3), 7296–7303 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082081099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cimatti, A., et al.: NuSMV 2: an OpenSource tool for symbolic model checking. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, pp. 359–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45657-0_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. De Nicola, R., Di Stefano, L., Inverso, O.: Multi-agent systems with virtual stigmergy. Sci. Comput. Program. 187, 102345 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2019.102345

  8. Demsar, J., Lebar Bajec, I.: Simulated predator attacks on flocks: a comparison of tactics. Artif. Life 20(3), 343–359 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1162/ARTL_a_00135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Desai, A., Saha, I., Yang, J., Qadeer, S., Seshia, S.A.: DRONA: a framework for safe distributed mobile robotics. In: ICCPS (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3055004.3055022

  10. Di Stefano, L., De Nicola, R., Inverso, O.: Verification of distributed systems via sequential emulation. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 31(3), 1–41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3490387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Stefano, L., Lang, F.: Verifying temporal properties of stigmergic collective systems using CADP. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2021. LNCS, vol. 13036, pp. 473–489. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89159-6_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Stefano, L., Lang, F., Serwe, W.: Combining SLiVER with CADP to analyze multi-agent systems. In: Bliudze, S., Bocchi, L. (eds.) COORDINATION 2020. LNCS, vol. 12134, pp. 370–385. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50029-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Emlen, J.T.: Flocking behavior in birds. Auk 69(2), 160–170 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Finkelshtein, D., Kondratiev, Y., Kutoviy, O.: Individual based model with competition in spatial ecology. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41(1), 297–317 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1137/080719376

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Francalanza, A., Aceto, L., Ingolfsdottir, A.: On verifying Hennessy-Milner logic with recursion at runtime. In: Bartocci, E., Majumdar, R. (eds.) RV 2015. LNCS, vol. 9333, pp. 71–86. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Inverso, O., Trubiani, C.: Parallel and distributed bounded model checking of multi-threaded programs. In: 25th Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP), pp. 202–216. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3332466.3374529

  17. Koenig, N., Howard, A.: Design and use paradigms for Gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), vol. 3, pp. 2149–2154. IEEE (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2004.1389727

  18. Kouvaros, P., Lomuscio, A.: A counter abstraction technique for the verification of robot swarms. In: 29th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 2081–2088. AAAI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuylen, E., Liesenborgs, J., Broeckhove, J., Hens, N.: Using individual-based models to look beyond the horizon: the changing effects of household-based clustering of susceptibility to measles in the next 20 years. In: Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., et al. (eds.) ICCS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12137, pp. 385–398. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50371-0_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lebar Bajec, I., Zimic, N., Mraz, M.: Simulating flocks on the wing: the fuzzy approach. J. Theor. Biol. 233, 199–220 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.10.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: A brief account of runtime verification. J. Log. Algebraic Program. 78(5), 293–303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlap.2008.08.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lomuscio, A., Qu, H., Raimondi, F.: MCMAS: an open-source model checker for the verification of multi-agent systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 19(1), 9–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-015-0378-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehmood, U., Roy, S., Grosu, R., Smolka, S.A., Stoller, S.D., Tiwari, A.: Neural flocking: MPC-based supervised learning of flocking controllers. In: Goubault-Larrecq, J., König, B. (eds.) FoSSaCS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12077, pp. 1–16. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45231-5_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Olfati-Saber, R.: Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 51(3), 401–420 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2005.864190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinciroli, C., Beltrame, G.: Buzz: an extensible programming language for heterogeneous swarm robotics. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3794–3800. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759558

  26. Pinciroli, C., et al.: ARGoS: a modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems. Swarm Intell. 6(4), 271–295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11721-012-0072-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 46–57. IEEE (1977). https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1977.32

  28. Quigley, M., et al.: ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reynolds, C.W.: Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH 1987, Anaheim, California, USA, 27–31 July 1987, pp. 25–34. ACM (1987). https://doi.org/10.1145/37401.37406

  30. Rohmer, E., Singh, S.P.N., Freese, M.: V-REP: a versatile and scalable robot simulation framework. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1321–1326. IEEE (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696520

  31. Sen, K., Viswanathan, M., Agha, G.: Statistical model checking of black-box probabilistic systems. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 202–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27813-9_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi, H., Wang, L., Chu, T.: Flocking of multi-agent systems with a dynamic virtual leader. Int. J. Control 82(1), 43–58 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170801983091

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Stiglitz, J.E., Gallegati, M.: Heterogeneous interacting agent models for understanding monetary economies. East. Econ. J. 37(1), 6–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2010.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toner, J., Tu, Y.: Flocks, herds, and schools: a quantitative theory of flocking. Phys. Rev. E 58(4), 4828–4858 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4828

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Vásárhelyi, G., et al.: Outdoor flocking and formation flight with autonomous aerial robots. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3866–3873. IEEE (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2014.6943105

  36. Winfield, A.F.T., Liu, W., Nembrini, J., Martinoli, A.: Modelling a wireless connected swarm of mobile robots. Swarm Intell. 2(2–4), 241–266 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-008-0018-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serenella Valiani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Nicola, R., Di Stefano, L., Inverso, O., Valiani, S. (2022). Modelling Flocks of Birds from the Bottom Up. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Adaptation and Learning. ISoLA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13703. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19759-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19759-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19758-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19759-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics