Skip to main content

An Empirical Comparative Analysis of Africans with Asians Using DCNN Facial Biometric Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biometric Recognition (CCBR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13628))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1079 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, the problem of racial bias in facial biometric systems has generated considerable attention from the media and biometric community. Many investigative studies have been published on estimating the bias between Caucasians and Asians, Caucasians and Africans, and other racial comparisons. These studies have reported inferior performances of both Asians and Africans when compared to other races. However, very few studies have highlighted the comparative differences in performance as a function of race between Africans and Asians. More so, those previous studies were mainly concentrated on a single aspect of facial biometrics and were usually conducted with images potentially captured with multiple camera sensors, thereby compounding their findings. This paper presents a comparative racial bias study of Asians with Africans on various facial biometric tasks. The images used were captured with the same camera sensor and under controlled conditions. We examine the performances of many DCNN-based models on face detection, facial landmark detection, quality assessment, verification, and identification. The results suggested higher performance on the Asians compared to the Africans by most algorithms under the same imaging and testing conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/weiliu89/caffe/tree/ssd.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/kpzhang93/MTCNN_face_detection_alignment.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/Tencent/FaceDetection-DSFD.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/sthanhng/yoloface.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/wy1iu/sphereface.

  6. 6.

    https://github.com/AlfredXiangWu/LightCNN.

  7. 7.

    https://github.com/deepinsight/insightface.

  8. 8.

    http://www.whdeng.cn/RFW/model.html.

References

  1. Gong, S., Liu, X., Jain, A.K.: Mitigating face recognition bias via group adaptive classifier. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07576 (2020)

  2. Wang, M., Deng, M.: Mitigating bias in face recognition using skewness-aware reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9322–9331 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drozdowski, P., Rathgeb, C., Dantcheva, A., Damer, N., Busch, C.: Demographic bias in biometrics: a survey on an emerging challenge. IEEE Trans. Technol, Soc (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singer, N.: Amazon’s facial recognition wrongly identifies 28 lawmakers, a.c.l.u. says, 2020–02-23 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/technology/amazon-aclu-facial-recognition-congress.html

  5. Cavazos, J.G., Phillips, P.J., Castillo, C.D., O’Toole, A.J.: Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias? Behavior, and Identity Science, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patrick, G., Mei, N., Kayee, H.: Face recognition vendor test (frvt) part 3: Demographic effects. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report NISTIR 8280 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, Conference Proceedings, pp. 77–91 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Du, M., Yang, F., Zou, N., Hu, X.: Fairness in deep learning: a computational perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08843 (2019)

  9. Wang, M., Deng, M., Hu, J., Tao, X., Huang, Y.: Racial faces in the wild: Reducing racial bias by information maximization adaptation network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Conference Proceedings, pp. 692–702 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, M., Deng, W.: Mitigate bias in face recognition using skewness-aware reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.10692 (2019)

  11. Nagpal, S., Singh, M., Singh, R., Vatsa, M., Ratha, N.: Deep learning for face recognition: pride or prejudiced? arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01219 (2019)

  12. Klare, B.F., Burge, M.J., Klontz, J.C., Bruegge, R.W.V., Jain, A.K.: Face recognition performance: role of demographic information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 7(6), 1789–1801 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavazos, J.G., Phillips, P.J., Castillo, C.D., O’Toole, A.J.: Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: where are we on measuring race bias?” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07398 (2019)

  14. Furl, N., Phillips, P.J., O’Toole, A.J.: Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cognitive Science 26(6), 797–815 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips, P.J., Jiang, F., Narvekar, A., Ayyad, J., O’Toole, A.J.: An other-race effect for face recognition algorithms. ACM Trans. Appl. Perception (TAP) 8(2), 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, W., Wen, Y., Yu, Z., Li, M., Raj, B., Song, L.: Sphereface: deep hypersphere embedding for face recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Conference Proceedings, pp. 212–220 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, Y., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Deep learning face representation from predicting 10,000 classes”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1891–1898 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., Philbin, J.: Facenet: a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Conference Proceedings, pp. 815–823 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, X., He, R., Sun, Z., Tan, T.: A light cnn for deep face representation with noisy labels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 13(11), 2884–2896 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., Zafeiriou, S.: Arcface: additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Conference Proceedings, pp. 4690–4699

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, Y., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Deep convolutional network cascade for facial point detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3476–3483 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, S., Luo, P., Loy, C.-C., Tang, X.: Wider face: a face detection benchmark. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5525–5533 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Terhorst, P., Kolf, J.N., Damer, N., Kirchbuchner, F., Kuijper, A.: Ser-fiq: unsupervised estimation of face image quality based on stochastic embedding robustness. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5651–5660 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, Y., Chen, S., Mau, S., Sanderson, C., Lovell, B.C., Patch-based probabilistic image quality assessment for face selection and improved video-based face recognition. In: CVPR: WORKSHOPS. IEEE 2011, pp. 74–81 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Visualizing data using t-sne: v. d. Maaten, L., Hinton, G. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. O’Toole, A.J., Phillips, P.J., An, X., Dunlop, J.: Demographic effects on estimates of automatic face recognition performance. Image Vision Comput. 30(3), 169–176 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jawad Muhammad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Muhammad, J., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, K., Sun, Z. (2022). An Empirical Comparative Analysis of Africans with Asians Using DCNN Facial Biometric Models. In: Deng, W., et al. Biometric Recognition. CCBR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20233-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20233-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20232-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20233-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics