Skip to main content

Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Proposal for a Validation Protocol and Cross-Sectional Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Workshops, 12th International Conference (MIS4TEL 2022)

Abstract

There is no evidence with regard to the effectiveness of the use of simulation in video conferences to facilitate the learning experiences of nursing student. Aims. To describe the research protocol 1) to validate instruments measuring student satisfaction, self-confidence, and perceptions of good planning and best practice in the use of virtual simulation in the Italian con- text on the basis of Jeffries and Rizzolo’s theoretical model in the Italian context and 2) to analyse student satisfaction, self-confidence, and perceptions of good planning and best practice in virtual simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. First, we will perform a validation study and then use a descriptive cross-sectional study design. Third year nursing students in a bachelor’s degree course in nursing in central Italy, who participated in virtual simulation-based learning during the COVID-19 pandemic will be included. We will consider translation and cultural adaptation, the content and face validity, the construct validity, the criterion validity, the reliability, and the responsiveness to changes in the instruments. Then we will consider means and standard deviations for evaluating the score of the instruments. Discussion. This study will provide us with the opportunity to determine the effectiveness of virtual simulation for nursing students. The intent is not only to evaluate students’ perceptions of virtual simulation but also to create a continuous monitoring system. The future intention is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual simulation for developing students’ skills during their internship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dewart, G., Corcoran, L., Thirsk, L., Petrovic, K.: Nursing education in a pandemic: academic challenges in response to COVID-19. Nurse Educ. Today 92, 104471 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malhotra, A.: Reflections on simulation and global health. Simul. Healthc. 5 May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000666. PMID: 35533141

  3. Goris, S., Bilgi, N., Korkut Bayındır, S.: The use of simulators in nursing education. Düzce Univ. Health Sci. Inst. J. 4(2), 25–29 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, M.J., Kang, H.S., De Gagne, J.C.: Nursing students’ perceptions and experiences of using virtual simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 60, 11–17 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdelkader, A., Elcokany, N.: Satisfaction and self-confidence with simulation learning experience as perceived by nursing students. Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Env. 12(1), 1–13 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol. Rev. 84(2), 191–215 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keleekai, N.L., et al.: Improving nurses’ peripheral intravenous catheter insertion knowledge, confidence, and skills using a simulation-based blended learning program: a randomized trial. Simul Healthc. 11(6), 376–384 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Monaghan, T.A.: Critical analysis of the literature and theoretical perspectives on theory-practice gap amongst newly qualified nurses within the United Kingdom. Nurse Educ. Today 35(8), e1–e7 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elhadary, O.: Student satisfaction in STEM: an exploratory study. Am. J. Educ. Res. 4(2), 195–199 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Özgüngör, S.: Identifying dimensions of students’ ratings that best predict students’ self efficacy, course value and satisfaction. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 10, 146–163 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider, M., Preckel, F.: Variables associated with achievement in higher education: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychol. Bull. 143(6), 565–600 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffries, P.R., Rodgers, B., Adamson, K.: NLN Jeffries simulation theory: brief narrative description. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 36(5), 292–293 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farrés-Tarafa, M., et al.: Reliability and validity study of the spanish adaptation of the “student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale” (SCLS). PLoS ONE 16(7), e0255188 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franklin, A.E., Burns, P., Lee, C.S.: Psychometric testing on the NLN student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning, simulation design scale, and educational practices questionnaire using a sample of pre-licensure novice nurses. Nurse Educ. Today 34(10), 1298–1304 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reierson, I.Å., Sandvik, L., Solli, H., Haukedal, T.A., Husebø, S.E.: Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the simulation design scale, the educational practices questionnaire and the student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale in nursing education. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. Adv. 2, 100012 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Unver, V., et al.: The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: the student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale, simulation design scale, and educational practices questionnaire. Contemp. Nurse 53(1), 60–74 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Cant, R., Cooper, S., Ryan, C.: Using virtual simulation to teach evidence-based practice in nursing curricula: a rapid review. Worldviews Ev. Based Nurs. 19, 415–422 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pett, M.A., Lackey, N.R., Sullivan, J.J.: Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standards Committee: INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation SM Faciltation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 12(S), S16–S20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jeffries, P.R., Rizzolo, M.A.: Designing and Implementing Models for the Innovative Use of Using Simulation to Teach Nursing Care of Ill Adults and Children: A National, Multi-Site, Multi-Method Study. National League for Nursing, New York, NY (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O.: Mplus User’s Guide, 8th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, USA (1998–2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sousa, V.D., Rojjanasrirat, W.: Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 17, 268–274 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Topf, M.: Three estimates of interrater reliability for nominal data. Nurs. Res. 35, 253–255 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waltz, C., Strickland, O., Lenz, E.: Measurement in Nursing Research, 2nd edn. Davis, Philadelphia (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K.: Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychol. Bull. 103, 299 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Muthén, B., Kaplan, D.A.: Comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 38, 171–189 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoyle, R.H.: Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li-tze, H., Bentler, P.M.: Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3(4), 424–453 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka, J.S.: Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds.) Testing structural equation models, pp. 10–40. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gribbons, B.C., Hocevar, D.: Levels of aggregation in higher level confirmatory factor analysis: application for academic self-concept. Struct. Equ. Model.: A Multi. J. 5, 377–390 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S.: Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn. Pearson, Boston, MA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thurstone, L.L.: Multiple Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1947)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Comrey, A.L., Lee, H.B.: A First Course in Factor Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Broadway (NJ) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen, J.: Set correlation and contingency tables. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 12(4), 425–434 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown, J.: Standard error vs. standard error of measurement. Shiken: JALT Test. Eval. SIG Newsl. 3, 20–25 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Beckerman, H., Roebroeck, M.E., Lankhorst, G.J., Becher, J.G., Bezemer, P.D., Verbeek, A.L.: Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual. Life Res. 10, 571–578 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nursing and Midwifery Council: Standards for pre-registration nursing education (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Grant support - Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giampiera Bulfone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mazzotta, R. et al. (2023). Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Proposal for a Validation Protocol and Cross-Sectional Study. In: Kubincová, Z., Melonio, A., Durães, D., Rua Carneiro, D., Rizvi, M., Lancia, L. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Workshops, 12th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 538. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20257-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics