Skip to main content

Abstract

Nursing simulation is a teaching method that supports and integrates student learning, along with clinical training and formal teaching without overlapping or replacing them. Virtual reality (VR) is one of the most recent technologies applied to nursing simulation. The added value of VR consists precisely in the immersion and in the sense of presence (the feeling of being there) that it can generate, allowing people to learn from the experience they are living as if it were happening in real life. The 360° video is a type of VR used in many sectors and increasingly in the healthcare one. The peculiarity of this experience is that the environments are not virtually reconstructed by a computer but they are real images and sounds previously recorded by a video camera. Therefore, the 360° video has great potential especially in nursing training and simulation. The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review on the 360° video applied to nursing education and how this experience was evaluated. A comprehensive electronic search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus) was conducted from their inception to December 2021. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were considered in this review. These studies encourage the use of this VR technology, but further research is necessary to explore the advantages of the 360° video as learning method in nursing education and to better understand how to evaluate this immersive experience in order to guarantee the effectiveness in terms of learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Murray, C., Grant, M.J., Howarth, M.L., Leigh, J.: The use of simulation as a teaching and learning approach to support practice learning. Nurse Educ. Pract. 8(1), 5–8 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zangari, C., Gazzelloni, A., D’Elpidio, G., Cirulli, L., La Torre, G.: Nursing simulation as learning strategy between fiction and reality: a narrative literature review. Senses Sci. 7(1), 944–960 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sherman, W., Craig, A.: Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Applications, and Design, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pottle, J.: Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Healthc. J. 6(3), 181–185 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings, J.J., Bailenson, J.N.: How immersive is enough? a meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol. 19, 272–309 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevens, J.A., Kincaid, J.P.: The relationship between presence and performance in virtual simulation training. Open J. Model. Simul. 3, 41–48 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grassini, S., Laumann, K.: Questionnaire measures and physiological correlates of presence: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 11(439), 1–21 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, E., Kim, H.T., Yoo, B.: Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 36(11), 1–25 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharey, S., Ng, D.B.: The use of virtual reality simulation among nursing students and registered nurses: a systematic review. Nurse Educ. Today 98, 104662 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fealy, S., et al.: The integration of immersive virtual reality in tertiary nursing and midwifery education: a scoping review. Nurse Educ. Today 79, 14–19 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyaw, M.B., et al.: Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J. Med. Internet Res. 21(1), e12959 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, F.Q., et al.: Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(9), e18290 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arksey, H., O’Malley, L.: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Page, M.J., et al.: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dang, B.K., et al.: A multi-site evaluation of observer roles and telepresence technology in simulation with prelicensure nursing students. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 55, 86–94 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, Y., Kim, S.K., Eom, M.-R.: Usability of mental illness simulation involving scenarios with patients with schizophrenia via immersive virtual reality: a mixed methods study. PLOS ONE 15(9), e0238437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dang, B.K., O’Leary-Kelley, C., Palicte, J.S., Badheka, S., Vuppalapati, C.: Comparing virtual reality telepresence and traditional simulation methods: a pilot study. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 41(2), 119–121 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiner, E., Gordon, J., Rudy, S., McNew, R.: Expanding virtual reality to teach ultrasound skills to nurse practitioner students. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 264, 893–897 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dang, B.K., et al.: Assessing simulation, virtual reality, and television modalities in clinical training. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 19, 30–37 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Env. 7(3), 225–240 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., Davidoff, J.: A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence 10, 282–297 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brooke, J.: SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation Industry, vol. 189. CRC Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. National League for Nurses: https://www.nln.org/news/research-statistics/professional-development-programsresearchtools-and-instruments/descriptions-of-available-instruments-096bb15c-7836-6c70-9642-ff00005f0421. Accessed 8 Apr 2022

  24. Kaplan, B.G., Abraham, C., Gary, R.: Effects of participation vs. observation of a simulation experience on testing outcomes: implications for logistical planning for a school of nursing. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 9, 14 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bong, C.L., Lee, S., Ng, A.S.B., Allen, J.C., Lim, E.H.L., Vidyarthi, A.: The effects of active (hot-seat) versus observer roles during simulation-based training on stress levels and non-technical performance: a randomized trial. Adv. Simul. 2, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-017-0040-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Regan, S., Molloy, E., Watterson, L., Nestel, D.: Observer roles that optimize learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review. Adv. Simul. 1, 4 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCauley, M.E., Sharkey, T.J.: Cybersickness: perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Env. 1(3), 311–318 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Gazzelloni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest.

All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gazzelloni, A., Sguanci, M., Piredda, M., D’Elpidio, G., De Marinis, M.G. (2023). Immersive Virtual Reality in Nursing Education. What About 360° Videos?. In: Kubincová, Z., Melonio, A., Durães, D., Rua Carneiro, D., Rizvi, M., Lancia, L. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Workshops, 12th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 538. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20257-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics