Skip to main content

A Dispersed Park as a Tool for Realizing the Concept of Ecosystem Services

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability (ARTIIS 2022)

Abstract

This paper about sustainable urban development from an ecological perspective. With increasing urbanization and the degradation of green infrastructure, the concept of ecosystem services helps to assess the services people receive from their interaction with nature. Cultural ecosystem services refer to intangible goods that play an important role in improving quality of life and environmental sustainability. There are major efforts around the world to incorporate ecosystem services and their value into policy, finance, and governance. This paper considers the concept of using dispersed parks as a tool for the implementation of cultural ecosystem services in the existing urban planning context and analyzes its effectiveness. The management system of a dispersed park makes it possible to realize a sustainable UGI facility at the neighborhood scale under current urban planning conditions. The paper contains a representation of the potential dispersed park.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UN: New Urban Agenda. United Nations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Jagt, A.P.N., et al.: Co-creating urban green infrastructure connecting people and nature: a guiding framework and approach. J. Environ. Manag. 233, 757–767 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.09.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lozhkin, A., Smirnova, M., Razzhivina, D., Golodyaev, K., Gizhitskaya, S.: Green Novosibirsk: the concept of development of green public spaces of citywide significance (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. MAE: Millennium ecosystem assessment ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haase, D., et al.: A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43, 413–433 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13280-014-0504-0/FIGURES/7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasan, S.S., Zhen, L., Miah, M.G., Ahamed, T., Samie, A.: Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: a review. Environ. Dev. 34, 100527 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVDEV.2020.100527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., Niemelä, J.: The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: a framework for supporting innovation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125, 254–259 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2014.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng, X., van Damme, S., Li, L., Uyttenhove, P.: Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosyst. Serv. 37, 100925 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2019.100925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adem Esmail, B., Cortinovis, C., Suleiman, L., Albert, C., Geneletti, D., Mörtberg, U.: Greening cities through urban planning: a literature review on the uptake of concepts and methods in Stockholm. Urban For. Urban Green. 72, 127584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2022.127584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DOM RF, STRELKA CB: Part 3. The standard of development of free territories, Moskow (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gorokhov, V.A.: Urban Green Building: A Textbook for Universities (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pauleit, S., et al.: Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project. Urban For. Urban Green. 40, 4–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2018.10.006

  13. Cheng, X., van Damme, S., Uyttenhove, P.: A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure. J. Environ. Manag. 293, 112895 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.112895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan: Cultural services and non-use values (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niemelä, J., et al.: Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 3225–3243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-010-9888-8/TABLES/3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, R., Olafsson, A.S., van der Jagt, A.P.N., Rall, E., Pauleit, S.: Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: what is the state of practice? Ecol. Ind. 96, 99–110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.09.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N.: Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2012.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moseley, D., Marzano, M., Chetcuti, J., Watts, K.: Green networks for people: application of a functional approach to support the planning and management of greenspace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 116, 1–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2013.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urban development. Urban and rural planning and development. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/456054209. Accessed 15 Apr 2022

  20. Flowers, E.P., Timperio, A., Hesketh, K.D., Veitch, J.: Comparing the features of parks that children usually visit with those that are closest to home: a brief report. Urban For. Urban Green. 48, 126560 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2019.126560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Y., Huang, T.T., Zheng, X.: A method of linking functional and structural connectivity analysis in urban green infrastructure network construction. Urban Ecosyst. 1, 1–17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11252-022-01201-2/FIGURES/10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krellenberg, K., Artmann, M., Stanley, C., Hecht, R.: What to do in, and what to expect from, urban green spaces – indicator-based approach to assess cultural ecosystem services. Urban For. Urban Green. 59, 126986 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2021.126986

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by The Russian Science Foundation, Agreement â„–22-21-20081.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Churiakova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Churiakova, T.A., Mishsina, M.E., Mityagin, S.A. (2022). A Dispersed Park as a Tool for Realizing the Concept of Ecosystem Services. In: Guarda, T., Portela, F., Augusto, M.F. (eds) Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability. ARTIIS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20315-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20316-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics