Skip to main content

Real-Time Condition-Based Maintenance of Friction Welding Tools by Generalized Fault Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability (ARTIIS 2022)

Abstract

In manufacturing processes, root cause analysis of tools’ failures is crucial to determine the system reliability and to derive cost minimizing strategies. Condition-based maintenance (CBM) is one of the relevant policies to reduce costs of tools usage subjected to degradation processes. In a previous work, the authors introduced a new statistical methodology entitled Generalized Fault Tree (GFT) analysis that demonstrated good results for reliability analysis and root cause analysis. In this work, we propose a new dynamic CBM methodology, through real-time failure forecasting of the replacement instant of friction welding tools at a Bosch TermoTechnology facility, based on the dynamic update of the GFT root probability. The GFT structure is described by data-driven basic events (BEs), obtained from an embedded accelerometer, and the tree that best describes the tools’ failures is obtained through a new training process that employs a pruning technique to reduce computational complexity. The results show that we can reduce at least 12% of the costs per welding cycle by applying the GFT approach and CBM, when compared with the current policy of preventive maintenance in (optimized) constant cycles replacement periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aslansefat, K., Latif-Shabgahi, G.R.: A hierarchical approach for dynamic fault trees solution through semi-Markov process. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 69(3), 986–1003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2019.2923893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayvaz, S., Alpay, K.: Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: a machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time. Expert Syst. Appl. 173, 114598 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114598

  3. Chiacchio, F., Iacono, A., Compagno, L., D’Urso, D.: A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 199, 106904 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coelho, D., Costa, D., Rocha, E.M., Almeida, D., Santos, J.P.: Predictive maintenance on sensorized stamping presses by time series segmentation, anomaly detection, and classification algorithms. Procedia Comput. Sci. 200, 1184–1193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dehnert, C., Junges, S., Katoen, J.P., Volk, M.: The probabilistic model checker storm (extended abstract), October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dugan, J., Bavuso, S., Boyd, M.: Dynamic fault-tree models for fault-tolerant computer systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 41(3), 363–377 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1109/24.159800

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Durga Rao, K., Gopika, V., Sanyasi Rao, V.V., Kushwaha, H.S., Verma, A.K., Srividya, A.: Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(4), 872–883 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elderhalli, Y., Hasan, O., Tahar, S.: A methodology for the formal verification of dynamic fault trees using HOL theorem proving. IEEE Access 7, 136176–136192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, D., Yang, M., Wu, H., Ge, D., Cao, X.: Dynamic reliability evaluation of diesel generator system of one Chinese 1000MWe NPP considering temporal failure effects. Front. Energy Res. 9, 816 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.793577

  10. Hu, J., Chen, P.: Predictive maintenance of systems subject to hard failure based on proportional hazards model. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 196, 106707 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2019.106707

  11. Jiang, G.J., Li, Z.Y., Qiao, G., Chen, H.X., Li, H.B., Sun, H.H.: Reliability analysis of dynamic fault tree based on binary decision diagrams for explosive vehicle. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5559475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kabir, S.: An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 77, 114–135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Dynamic system safety analysis in HiP-HOPS with Petri Nets and Bayesian Networks. Saf. Sci. 105, 55–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiser, K.A., Gebraeel, N.Z.: Sensor-based degradation models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 39(4), 840–849 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P.: Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 109, 5–17 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohonen, T.: The self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE 78(9), 1464–1480 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/5.58325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J., Kao, H.A., Yang, S.: Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP 16, 3–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001

  18. Leevy, J.L., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Bauder, R.A., Seliya, N.: Investigating the relationship between time and predictive model maintenance. J. Big Data 7(1), 1–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00312-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lei, Y., Li, N., Gontarz, S., Lin, J., Radkowski, S., Dybala, J.: A model-based method for remaining useful life prediction of machinery. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 65(3), 1314–1326 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2016.2570568

  20. Li, N., Lei, Y., Yan, T., Li, N., Han, T.: A wiener-process-model-based method for remaining useful life prediction considering unit-to-unit variability. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 66(3), 2092–2101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2838078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liao, L., Jin, W., Pavel, R.: Prognosability regularization for prognostics and health assessment. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 63(11), 7076–7083 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Merle, G., Roussel, J.M., Lesage, J.J., Bobbio, A.: Probabilistic algebraic analysis of fault trees with priority dynamic gates and repeated events. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 59(1), 250–261 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2009.2035793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merle, G., et al.: Function to cite this version: HAL Id: hal-00566334 Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis Based on the Structure Function (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohd Nizam Ong, N.A.F., Sadiq, M.A., Md Said, M.S., Jomaas, G., Mohd Tohir, M.Z., Kristensen, J.S.: Fault tree analysis of fires on rooftops with photovoltaic systems. J. Build. Eng. 46(2021), 103752 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103752

  25. Paris, P., Erdogan, F.: A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J. Basic Eng. 85(4), 528–533 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900

  26. Rocha, E.M., Nunes, P., Santos, J.: Reliability analysis of sensorized stamping presses by generalized fault trees. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey, 7–10 March 2022 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruijters, E., Stoelinga, M.: Fault tree analysis: a survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools, February 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2015.03.001

  28. Sihite, J.F., Kohda, T.: Assessing the reliability of power transformer by quantitative fault tree analysis. Adv. Mater. Res. 694(697), 901–906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stamatelatos, M., et al.: Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. Technical report (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sullivan, K., Dugan, J., Coppit, D.: The Galileo fault tree analysis tool. In: Digest of Papers. Twenty-Ninth Annual International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing (Cat. No. 99CB36352), pp. 232–235, December. IEEE Computer Society (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1999.781056

  31. Xu, Z., Guo, D., Wang, J., Li, X., Ge, D.: A numerical simulation method for a repairable dynamic fault tree. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc 23(1), 34–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17531/EIN.2021.1.4

  32. You, M.Y., Liu, F., Wang, W., Meng, G.: Statistically planned and individually improved predictive maintenance management for continuously monitored degrading systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 59(4), 744–753 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2085572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zelenin, A., Kropp, A.: Apache Kafka. In: Apache Kafka, pp. I-XVII. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München, November 2021. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446470460.fm

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study was partially developed in the scope of the Project Augmented Humanity (PAH) [POCI-01-0247- FEDER-046103], financed by Portugal 2020, under the Competitiveness and Internationalization Operational Program, the Lisbon Regional Operational Program, and by the European Regional Development Fund. The first author has a PhD grant supported FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. for the PhD grants ref. 2020.06926.BD. The second author was partially supported by the Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, reference UIDB/04106/2020. The first and fourth authors would like to acknowledge the University of Aveiro, FCT/MCTES for the financial support of TEMA research unit (FCT Ref. UIDB/00481/2020 & UIDP/00481/2020) and CENTRO01- 0145-FEDER-022083 - Regional Operational Program of the Center (Centro2020), within the scope of the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund. The third author was supported by Bosch Termotecnologia, SA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Nunes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used in this work are confidential information of Bosch company manufacturing system, so they are not publicly available.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nunes, P., Rocha, E.M., Neves, J., Santos, J. (2022). Real-Time Condition-Based Maintenance of Friction Welding Tools by Generalized Fault Trees. In: Guarda, T., Portela, F., Augusto, M.F. (eds) Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability. ARTIIS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1675. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20319-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20319-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20318-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20319-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics