Skip to main content

Exact and Approximation Algorithms for PMMS Under Identical Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (TAMC 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13571))

Abstract

Fair division of resources is a fundamental problem in many disciplines, including computer science, economy, operations research, etc. In the context of fair allocation of indivisible goods, it is well-known that an allocation satisfying the maximum Nash Social Welfare (Max-NSW) is envy-free up to one good (EF1). In this paper, we further consider the relation between a Max-NSW allocation and two well-adopted fairness properties, i.e., envy-free up to any good (EFX) and pairwise maximin share (PMMS). In particular, we show that a Max-NSW allocation is both EFX and PMMS when agents have identical valuation function. Of independent interests, we also provide an algorithm for computing a PMMS allocation for identical variant. Moreover, we show that a \(\frac{4}{5}\)-PMMS allocation always exists and can be computed in polynomial time when agents have additive valuations and agree on the ordinal ranking of the goods (although they may disagree on the specific cardinal values).

Supported by NSFC 12071460.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amanatidis, G., Birmpas, G., Markakis, V.: Comparing approximate relaxations of envy-freeness. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 42–48. IJCAI2018, AAAI Press, Stockholm, Sweden (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amanatidis, G., Markakis, E., Ntokos, A.: Multiple birds with one stone: beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via envy cycle elimination. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 841, 94–109 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barman, S., Krishnamurthy, S.K., Vaish, R.: Finding fair and efficient allocations. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 557–574. EC 2018, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barman, S., Murthy, S.K.K.: Approximation algorithms for maximin fair division. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 647–664. EC 2017, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barman, S., Verma, P.: Existence and computation of maximin fair allocations under matroid-rank valuations. In: Dignum, F., Lomuscio, A., Endriss, U., Nowé, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 169–177. AAMAS2021, ACM, Virtual Event, United Kingdom (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouveret, S., Lemaître, M.: Characterizing conflicts in fair division of indivisible goods using a scale of criteria. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. 30(2), 259–290 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Budish, E.: The combinatorial assignment problem: approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. J. Polit. Econ. 119(6), 1061–1103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, Z., Zheng, X.: A private and efficient mechanism for data uploading in smart cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 7(2), 766–775 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Caragiannis, I., Kurokawa, D., Moulin, H., Procaccia, A.D., Shah, N., Wang, J.: The unreasonable fairness of maximum Nash welfare. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 7(3), 1–32 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaudhury, B.R., Garg, J., Mehlhorn, K.: EFX exists for three agents. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 1–19. EC 2020, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chin, F.Y.L., et al.: Competitive algorithms for unbounded one-way trading. Theor. Comput. Sci. 607, 35–48 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolev, D., Feitelson, D.G., Halpern, J.Y., Kupferman, R., Linial, N.: No justified complaints: on fair sharing of multiple resources. In: Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 68–75. ITCS2012, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenberg, E., Gale, D.: Consensus of subjective probabilities: the pari-mutuel method. Ann. Math. Stat. 30(1), 165–168 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Etsion, Y., Ben-Nun, T., Feitelson, D.G.: A global scheduling framework for virtualization environments. In: 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, pp. 1–8. IPDPS 2009, IEEE, Rome, Italy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghodsi, A., Zaharia, M., Hindman, B., Konwinski, A., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Dominant resource fairness: Fair allocation of multiple resource types. In: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 323–336. NSDI2011, USENIX Association, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grandl, R., Ananthanarayanan, G., Kandula, S., Rao, S., Akella, A.: Multi-resource packing for cluster schedulers. In: ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference, pp. 455–466. SIGCOMM 2014, ACM, Chicago, IL, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaneko, M., Nakamura, K.: The Nash social welfare function. Econometrica 47(2), 423–435 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurokawa, D.: Fair Division in Game Theoretic Settings. Carnegie Mellon University (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, E.: APX-hardness of maximizing Nash social welfare with indivisible items. Inf. Process. Lett. 122, 17–20 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lipton, R., Markakis, E., Mossel, E., Saberi, A.: On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 125–131. EC 2004, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moulin, H.: Fair division and collective welfare, vol. 1. MIT Press, 1st edn. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Plaut, B., Roughgarden, T.: Almost envy-freeness with general valuations. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 34(2), 1039–1068 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Procaccia, A.D., Wang, J.: Fair enough: guaranteeing approximate maximin shares. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 675–692. EC 2014, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dai, S., Gao, G., Guo, X., Zhang, Y. (2022). Exact and Approximation Algorithms for PMMS Under Identical Constraints. In: Du, DZ., Du, D., Wu, C., Xu, D. (eds) Theory and Applications of Models of Computation. TAMC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13571. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20350-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20350-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20349-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20350-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics