Skip to main content

A Computational Approach for Contactless Muscle Force and Strain Estimations in Distributed Actuation Biohybrid Mesh Constructs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems (Living Machines 2022)

Abstract

Biological muscle tissue can adapt to mechanical stimuli such as strain and become stronger. While this property has been explored for single, independent muscle actuators, it is still not well understood for more complex, distributed actuation architectures, which are needed for more complex biohybrid robotic systems. This study presents a computational approach for contactless methods to estimate individual muscle actuator strains and individual muscle forces on a distributed-actuator biohybrid mesh substrate. The methods presented in this work estimate the strain each muscle experiences as the substrate is stretched by creating a finite element model of our distributed muscle actuator biohybrid mesh, taking \(79.8 \pm 51.9\) s to compute. Additionally, two contactless methods for muscle force estimation based on patterned substrate deformation are presented and compared: 1) Response Surface optimization, and 2) Direct Optimization. Both force estimation methods extract distributed muscle forces based on global substrate deformations. The Response Surface optimization resulted in a prediction error of \(321 \pm 219\,\upmu \)m with a runtime after model creation of \(26 \pm 1.3\) s. The Direct Optimization method resulted in a prediction error of 0 \(\upmu \)m but took a long, highly-variable runtime of \(663.4 \pm 918.5\) s. Directions for further improvement are discussed. Towards experimental validation of the outlined computational tools, a biaxial stretcher was constructed, and the ability to command desired displacements with the apparatus was characterized. The biaxial stretching platform achieved an average precision error of 3.10 ± 5.92% and 5.34 ± 2.38% for the x- and y-bars, respectively. Our methods aim to fill a critical gap in the design and analysis capabilities available to biohybrid robotics researchers. These preliminary estimation methods indicate the feasibility of our contactless muscle strain and muscle force estimation paradigm, which will be used to inform future in vitro experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tracker Video Analysis Tool. https://physlets.org/tracker/

  2. Designxplorer user guide (2019). https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/

  3. Genetic aggregation (2020). https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/

  4. MOGA Workflow MOGA Steps to Generate a New Population (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ben Salem, M., Roustant, O., Gamboa, F., Tomaso, L.: Universal prediction distribution for surrogate models. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 5, 1086–1109 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Boxerbaum, A.S., Shaw, K.M., Chiel, H.J., Quinn, R.D.: Continuous wave peristaltic motion in a robot. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31(3), 302–318 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cvetkovic, C., et al.: Three-dimensionally printed biological machines powered by skeletal muscle. PNAS 11(28), 10125–10130 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donnelly, K., Khodabukus, A., Philp, A., Deldicque, L., Dennis, R.G., Baar, K.: A novel bioreactor for stimulating skeletal muscle in vitro. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 16(4), 711–718 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinds, S., Bian, W., Dennis, R.G., Bursac, N.: The role of extracellular matrix composition in structure and function of bioengineered skeletal muscle. Biomaterials 32(14), 3575–3583 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horchler, A.D., et al.: Peristaltic locomotion of a modular mesh-based worm robot: precision, compliance, and friction. Soft Robot. 2(4), 135–145 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingber, D.E.: Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J. 20(8), 811–827 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Islam, A., Chapin, K., Younesi, M., Akkus, O.: Computer aided biomanufacturing of mechanically robust pure collagen meshes with controlled macroporosity. Biofabrication 7(3), 035005 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kandhari, A., Wang, Y., Chiel, H.J., Daltorio, K.A.: Turning in worm-like robots: the geometry of slip elimination suggests nonperiodic waves. Soft Robot. 6(4), 560–577 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, K.Y., et al.: An autonomously swimming biohybrid fish designed with human cardiac biophysics. Science 375(6581), 639–647 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mammoto, T., Mammoto, A., Ingber, D.E.: Mechanobiology and developmental control. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 29(1), 27–61 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morimoto, Y., Onoe, H., Takeuchi, S.: Biohybrid robot powered by an antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Sci. Robot. 3 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nawroth, J.C., et al.: A tissue-engineered jellyfish with biomimetic propulsion. Nat. Biotechnol. 30(8), 792–797 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pagan-Diaz, G.J., et al.: Simulation and fabrication of stronger, larger, and faster walking biohybrid machines. Adv. Func. Mater. 28(23), 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Park, S.J., et al.: Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray. Science 353(6295), 158–162 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Powell, C.A., Smiley, B.L., Mills, J., Vandenburgh, H.H.: Mechanical stimulation improves tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 283(5), 1557–1565 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raman, R., et al.: SI: damage, healing, and remodeling in optogenetic skeletal muscle bioactuators. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6(12) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rangarajan, S., Madden, L., Bursac, N.: Use of flow, electrical, and mechanical stimulation to promote engineering of striated muscles. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42(7), 1391–1405 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0966-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ricotti, L., et al.: Biohybrid actuators for robotics: a review of devices actuated by living cells. Sci. Robot. 2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Selman Sakar, M., et al.: Formation and optogenetic control of engineered 3D skeletal muscle bioactuators. Lab Chip 23, 4976–4985 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seok, S., Onal, C.D., Cho, K.J., Wood, R.J., Rus, D., Kim, S.: Meshworm: a peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18(5), 1485–1497 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiwarski, D.J., Tashman, J.W., Eaton, A.F., Apodaca, G., Feinberg, A.W.: 3D printed biaxial stretcher compatible with live fluorescence microscopy. HardwareX 7, e00095 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Turner, D.Z.: Digital image correlation engine (DICe) reference manual, Sandia report, SAND2015-10606 O. Technical report, Sandia report (2015). https://github.com/dicengine/dice

  28. Webster, V.A., et al.: Aplysia Californica as a novel source of material for biohybrid robots and organic machines. In: Lepora, N.F.F., Mura, A., Mangan, M., Verschure, P.F.M.J.F.M.J., Desmulliez, M., Prescott, T.J.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9793, pp. 365–374. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42417-0_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Webster, V.A., Hawley, E.L., Akkus, O., Chiel, H.J., Quinn, R.D.: Effect of actuating cell source on locomotion of organic living machines with electrocompacted collagen skeleton. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 11(3), 036012 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Webster-Wood, V.A., Akkus, O., Gurkan, U.A., Chiel, H.J., Quinn, R.D.: Organismal engineering: toward a robotic taxonomic key for devices using organic materials. Sci. Robot. 2(12), 1–19 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based on work supported by a Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Dean’s Fellowship as well as National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under grant No. DGE1745016 and by the National Science Foundation CAREER award program (grant no. ECCS-2044785). The authors would also like to acknowledge Ian Turner for his work on design and assembly of the camera mounting rig and Brian Bock for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saul Schaffer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schaffer, S., Lee, J.S., Beni, L., Webster-Wood, V.A. (2022). A Computational Approach for Contactless Muscle Force and Strain Estimations in Distributed Actuation Biohybrid Mesh Constructs. In: Hunt, A., et al. Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13548. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20470-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20470-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20469-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20470-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics