Abstract
The fifth Industrial Revolution (Industry 5.0) encompasses the transition from a digital-driven to a sustainable, human-centric, and resilient industry. Industry 5.0 recognize and value the role of workers in the production system. Therefore, it sets the health and safety of employees as a priority. Workers will be empowered and aided by robots and advanced technologies in order to improve work processes and work areas, hence improving companies’ productivity and efficiency. However, the shift from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 will de- pend on how employees will embrace the new vision and on how prepared they are to work alongside machines, especially since advanced technologies have developed the fear of loss of jobs among employees. In this context, we propose a roadmap to implement the industry 5.0 vision and build interest among workers for change by merging two concepts ADKAR and Quality Circles. Furthermore, we discussed the impact of industry 5.0 on Total Quality Management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Garouani, M., Ahmad, A., Bouneffa, M., Hamlich, M.: AMLBID: an auto-explained automated machine learning tool for big industrial data. SoftwareX 17, 100919 (2022)
Hamlich, M., Ramdani, M.: Data classification by SAC “Scout Ants for Clustering” algorithm. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 55(1), 66–73 (2013)
Chaabi, M., Hamlich, M.: A sight on defect detection methods for imbalanced industrial data. In: ITM Web of Conferences, vol. 43, p. 01012 (2022)
Govindarajan, U.H., Trappey, A.J., Trappey, C.V.: Immersive technology for human-centric cyberphysical systems in complex manufacturing processes: a comprehensive overview of the global patent profile using collective intelligence. Complexity. 2018 (2018)
Kaasinen, E., et al.: Empowering and engaging industrial workers with operator 4.0 solutions. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 105678 (2020)
Yu, K., Luo, B.N., Feng, X., Liu, J.: Supply chain information integration, flexibility, and operational performance: an archival search and content analysis. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 29 (2018)
Garouani, M., Ahmad, A., Bouneffa, M., Hamlich, M., Bourguin, G., Lewandowski, A.: Towards big industrial data mining through explainable automated machine learning (2021). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs755783/v1
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L.: Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0—inception, conception and perception. J. Manuf. Syst. 61, 530–535 (2021)
Maddikunta, P.K.R., et al.: Industry 5.0: a survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 26, 100257 (2022)
Sundelin, N.: Guidelines for implementing collaborative robots in industrial application (2021)
Vu, H.T., Lim, J.: Effects of country and individual factors on public acceptance of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies: a multilevel SEM analysis of 28-country survey data. Behav. Inf. Technol. 41, 1–14 (2021)
Cheng, W.-J., Pien, L.-C., Cheng, Y.: Occupation-level automation probability is associated with psychosocial work conditions and workers’ health: a multilevel study. Am. J. Ind. Med. 64(2), 108–117 (2021)
Pinzone, M., et al.: A framework for operative and social sustainability functionalities in Human-Centric Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 105132 (2020)
Mattsson, S., Ekstrand, E., Tarrar, M.: Understanding disturbance handling in complex assembly: analysis of complexity index method results. Procedia Manuf. 25, 213–222 (2018)
Rožanec, J.M., et al.: Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence Architecture for Industry 5.0 Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10794 (2022)
Rowlands, H., Milligan, S.: ‘Quality-driven industry 4.0’, in key challenges and opportunities for quality, sustainability and innovation in the fourth industrial revolution: quality and service management in the fourth industrial revolution—sustainability and value co-creation. In: World Scientific, pp. 3–30 (2021)
Romero, D., et al.: Towards an operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. In: 46th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, pp. 1–11 (2016), ISSN 2164–8670 CD-ROM, ISSN 2164–8689
Anand Jayakumar, A., Krishnaraj, C.: Quality circle–formation and implementation. Int. J. Emer. Res. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2(2) (2015)
Boca, G.D.: Adkar model vs. quality management change (2013)
Charantimath, P.M.: Total Quality Management. Pearson Education India (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chaabi, M. (2022). Roadmap to Implement Industry 5.0 and the Impact of This Approach on TQM. In: Hamlich, M., Bellatreche, L., Siadat, A., Ventura, S. (eds) Smart Applications and Data Analysis. SADASC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20490-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20490-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20489-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20490-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)