Skip to main content

Combining Learner Model and Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Sequencing of Learning Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 12th International Conference (MIS4TEL 2022)

Abstract

In this paper, we present an approach for adapting the sequencing of learning activities that relies on the Q-learning, a reinforcement learning algorithm. The Q-learning learns a sequencing policy to select learning activities that improves the knowledge states of students.

In this research, we rely on the student knowledge state inferred by the Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) at every testing activity to calculate the reward of the Q-Learning. The more the Q-Learning decision improves the student knowledge state the greater the reward received by the Q-Learning. In addition, we propose a 3-step method aiming to ensure that the use of the Q-Learning is education domain compliant. It consists on training the Q-Learning first on simulated students to answer the “cold start” problem of the Q-Learning.

We present empirical results showing that the sequencing policy resulting from the 3-step method provides the ITS with an efficient strategy to improve the students’ knowledge states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aleven, V., et al.: Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, pp. 522–560 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bassen, J., et al.: Reinforcement learning for the adaptive scheduling of educational activities. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 4(4), 253–278 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doroudi, S., et al.: Sequence matters but how exactly? a method for evaluating activity sequences from data. In: Grantee Submission (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doroudi, S., Aleven, V., Brunskill, E.: Where’s the reward? Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 29(4), 568–620 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00187-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Efremov, A., Ghosh, A., Singla, A.: Zero-shot learning of hint policy via reinforcement learning and program synthesis. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mandel, T., et al.: Offline policy evaluation across representations with applications to educational games. In: AAMAS, vol. 1077 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Learning from delayed rewards (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amel Yessad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yessad, A. (2023). Combining Learner Model and Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Sequencing of Learning Activities. In: Temperini, M., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 12th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20617-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics