Skip to main content

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) and Serious Games have proven to be effective in employee training, especially when teaching practice-oriented tasks. This is of great value for intralogistics and its practical and complex processes. The VR-based learning game InGo simulates a receiving goods process for intralogistics. A study carried out in this work explores the effects on the learning success as well as other factors when learning with the VR-based game. It compares the effects with a control group that learns the same process with traditional text-based learning. Although the results of the study show that there is no significant difference between the two groups in terms of learning success itself, they confirm the positive influence on other factors that reinforce learning, such as intrinsic motivation and flow. This supports previous research that indicates the high potential of VR-based learning and educational games. The different preconditions of the VR group compared to the control group emphasize the positive effect of VR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albus, P., Vogt, A., Seufert, T.: Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Comput. Educ. 166, 104154 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith, E.E., Killingsworth, S.S.: Digital games, design, and learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 86(1), 79–122 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.W.: What are the learning affordances of 3-d virtual environments? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41, 10–32 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Georgiou, Y., Kyza, E.A.: The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: an instrument for measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 98, 24–37 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. J. Educ. Meas. 51(3), 335–337 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, A.M., Ozogul, G., Reisslein, M.: Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: moderating effects of prior knowledge. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 31, 97–115 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, D.M.: Introduction to and review of simulator sickness research (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korbach, A., Brünken, R., Park, B.: Measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning: a comparison of different objective measures. Instr. Sci. 45, 515–536 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9413-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamb, R.L.: Examination of the effects of dimensionality on cognitive processing in science: a computational modeling experiment comparing online laboratory simulations and serious educational games. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(1), 1–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9587-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A.F., Christensen, H., Korten, A.E., Jacomb, P.A., Rodgers, B.: A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Pers. Individ. Differ. 27(3), 405–416 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazza, G.L., Enders, C.K., Ruehlman, L.S.: Addressing item-level missing data: a comparison of proration and full information maximum likelihood estimation. Multivar. Behav. Res. 50(5), 504–519 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moroney, W., Biers, D., Eggemeier, F., Mitchell, J.: A comparison of two scoring procedures with the nasa task load index in a simulated flight task. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference@m_NAECON 1992, pp. 734–740, vol. 2 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nadler, R.T., Rabi, R., Minda, J.P.: Better mood and better performance: learning rule-described categories is enhanced by positive mood. Psychol. Sci. 21(12), 1770–1776 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Omelicheva, M.Y., Avdeyeva, O.: Teaching with lecture or debate? testing the effectiveness of traditional versus active learning methods of instruction. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 41(3), 603–607 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ray, A.B., Deb, S.: Smartphone based virtual reality systems in classroom teaching - a study on the effects of learning outcome. In: 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pp. 68–71 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reid, D.: A model of playfulness and flow in virtual reality interactions. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 13(4), 451–462 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruvimova, A., Kim, J., Fritz, T., Hancock, M., Shepherd, D.C.: “Transport me away": fostering flow in open offices through virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sattar, M.U., Palaniappan, S., Lokman, A., Hassan, A., Shah, N., Riaz, Z.: Effects of virtual reality training on medical students’ learning motivation and competency. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 35(3), 852 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., Teather, R.J.: Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Reality 25(1), 257–277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlüter, C., Kretschmer, V.: Next level training in logistics: evaluation of a virtual reality-based serious game for warehouse logistics. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Modeling & Applied Simulation (MAS 2020), pp. 138–145 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shou, Y., Olney, J.: Attitudes toward risk and uncertainty: the role of subjective knowledge and affect. J. Behav. Decis. Making 34(3), 393–404 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tauscher, J.P., et al.: Exploring neural and peripheral physiological correlates of simulator sickness. Comput. Animation Virtual Worlds 31(4–5), e1953 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilde, M., Bätz, K., Kovaleva, A., Urhahne, D.: Überprüfung einer kurzskala intrinsischer motivation (kim) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yörük Açıkel, B., Turhan, U., Akbulut, Y.: Effect of multitasking on simulator sickness and performance in 3d aerodrome control training. Simul. Gaming 49(1), 27–49 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G., Chen, Q.: Reconsidering baron and kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37, 197–206 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Özhan, ŞÇ., Kocadere, S.A.: The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57(8), 2006–2031 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our thanks to the students and teachers at the Berufskolleg Wirtschaft und Verwaltung Remscheid. This study was carried out as a project within the interdisciplinary Center of Excellence Logistics and IT (https://leistungszentrum-logistik-it.de/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Ziolkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kolarik, S., Ziolkowski, K., Schlüter, C. (2023). Effects of VR on Learning Experience and Success. In: Temperini, M., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 12th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20617-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics