Skip to main content

Budget-Feasible Sybil-Proof Mechanisms for Crowdsensing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Algorithmic Wisdom (IJTCS-FAW 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13461))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The rapid use of smartphones and devices leads to the development of crowdsensing (CS) systems where a large crowd of participants can take part in performing data collecting tasks in large-scale distributed networks. Participants/users in such systems are usually selfish and have private information, such as costs and identities. Budget-feasible mechanism design, as a sub-field of auction theory, is a useful paradigm for crowdsensing, which naturally formulates the procurement scenario with buyers’ budgets being considered and allows the users to bid their private costs. Although the bidding behavior is well-regulated, budget-feasible mechanisms are still vulnerable to the Sybil attack where users may generate multiple fake identities to manipulate the system. Thus, it is vital to provide Sybil-proof budget-feasible mechanisms for crowdsensing. In this paper, we design a budget-feasible incentive mechanism which can guarantee truthfulness and deter Sybil attack. We prove that the proposed mechanism achieves individual rationality, truthfulness, budget feasibility, and Sybil-proofness. Extensive simulation results further validate the efficiency of the proposed mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anari, N., Goel, G., Nikzad, A.: Mechanism design for crowdsourcing: an optimal 1-1/e competitive budget-feasible mechanism for large markets. In: 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 266–275. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brill, M., Conitzer, V., Freeman, R., Shah, N.: False-name-proof recommendations in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, pp. 332–340. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, N., Gravin, N., Lu, P.: On the approximability of budget feasible mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 685–699. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cui, J., et al.: TCAM: a truthful combinatorial auction mechanism for crowdsourcing systems. In: 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Q., Ni, L.M., Vasilakos, A.V.: TRAC: truthful auction for location-aware collaborative sensing in mobile crowdsourcing. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2014-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1231–1239. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, L., Hou, F., Huang, J.: Providing long-term participation incentive in participatory sensing. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 2803–2811. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goel, G., Nikzad, A., Singla, A.: Mechanism design for crowdsourcing markets with heterogeneous tasks. In: Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, H., Xin, Y., Sun, Y.E., Yang, W.: A truthful double auction mechanism for crowdsensing systems with max-min fairness. In: 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koutsopoulos, I.: Optimal incentive-driven design of participatory sensing systems. In: 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 1402–1410. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, J., Li, M., Yang, D., Xue, G., Tang, J.: Sybil-proof incentive mechanisms for crowdsensing. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Myerson, R.B.: Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Qiao, Y., Wu, J., Cheng, H., Huang, Z., He, Q., Wang, C.: Truthful mechanism design for multiregion mobile crowdsensing. In: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singer, Y.: Budget feasible mechanisms. In: 2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 765–774. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singer, Y., Mittal, M.: Pricing mechanisms for crowdsourcing markets. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1157–1166. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Singla, A., Krause, A.: Truthful incentives in crowdsourcing tasks using regret minimization mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1167–1178. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Terada, K., Yokoo, M.: False-name-proof multi-unit auction protocol utilizing greedy allocation based on approximate evaluation values. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 337–344. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Todo, T., Iwasaki, A., Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y.: Characterizing false-name-proof allocation rules in combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 265–272. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Von Ahn, L., Maurer, B., McMillen, C., Abraham, D., Blum, M.: reCAPTCHA: human-based character recognition via web security measures. Science 321(5895), 1465–1468 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Q., et al.: ALETHEIA: robust large-scale spectrum auctions against false-name bids. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 27–36. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, J., Xiang, J., Yang, D.: Incentive mechanisms for time window dependent tasks in mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 14(11), 6353–6364 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., Tang, J.: Crowdsourcing to smartphones: incentive mechanism design for mobile phone sensing. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 173–184. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., Tang, J.: Incentive mechanisms for crowdsensing: crowdsourcing with smartphones. IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 24(3), 1732–1744 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yao, Y., et al.: Multi-channel based Sybil attack detection in vehicular ad hoc networks using RSSI. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 18(2), 362–375 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., Matsubara, S.: The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: new fraud in internet auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 46(1), 174–188 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X., Xue, G., Yu, R., Yang, D., Tang, J.: Truthful incentive mechanisms for crowdsourcing. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 2830–2838. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, X., Xue, G., Yu, R., Yang, D., Tang, J.: Countermeasures against false-name attacks on truthful incentive mechanisms for crowdsourcing. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35(2), 478–485 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, D., Li, X.Y., Ma, H.: How to crowdsource tasks truthfully without sacrificing utility: online incentive mechanisms with budget constraint. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2014-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1213–1221. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao, D., Li, X.Y., Ma, H.: Budget-feasible online incentive mechanisms for crowdsourcing tasks truthfully. IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. (TON) 24(2), 647–661 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu, X., An, J., Yang, M., Xiang, L., Yang, Q., Gui, X.: A fair incentive mechanism for crowdsourcing in crowd sensing. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(6), 1364–1372 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under grant No. 2019YFB2102200, National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61672154, 61672370, 61972086 and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province under grant No. KYCX19_0089.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwei Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, X., Wu, W., Wang, W., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Cui, H. (2022). Budget-Feasible Sybil-Proof Mechanisms for Crowdsensing. In: Li, M., Sun, X. (eds) Frontiers of Algorithmic Wisdom. IJTCS-FAW 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13461. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20796-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20796-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20795-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20796-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics