Skip to main content

ConQeng: A Middleware for Quality of Context Aware Selection, Measurement and Validation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Internet of Things (GIoTS 2022)

Abstract

A set of quality metrics (e.g., timeliness, completeness) together represent the Quality of Context (QoC); their values determine the usability of context to context consumers (IoT applications). Therefore, obtaining adequate ‘QoC from the context providers (context sources) represents a significant research challenge. This paper presents a framework called conQeng that addresses such a challenge through novel approaches in QoC-aware selection, QoC measurement and validation. ConQeng selects the potential context providers that deliver an adequate QoC during runtime, assesses their performance - for further selection, and transfers QoC-assured context to the context management platforms (CMPs). We have implemented conQeng in a simulated scenario involving autonomous cars, marketing service agencies as context consumers, and thermal and video cameras as context providers. The results demonstrate that it outperforms three heuristic approaches in reducing context acquisition cost and improving effectiveness and performance efficiency while obtaining adequate QoC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dey, A.: Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 5, 4–7 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790170019

  2. Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., Georgakopoulos, D.: CA4IOT: context awareness for Internet of Things. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications, pp. 775–782. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hassani, A., Medvedev, A., Zaslavsky, A., Delir Haghighi, P., Jayaraman, P., Ling, S.: Efficient execution of complex context queries to enable near real-time smart IoT applications. Sensors. 19, 5457 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchholz, T., Küpper, A., Schiffers, M.: Quality of Context: what it is and why we need it. In: 2003 Workshop of the HP Open View University Association, pp. 1–14. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manzoor, A., Truong, H., Dustdar, S.: Quality of Context: models and applications for context-aware systems in pervasive environments. Knowl Eng. Rev. 29, 154–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brgulja, N., Kusber, R., David, K., Baumgarten, M.: Measuring the probability of correctness of contextual information in context aware systems. In: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, pp. 246–253. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. https://www.didiglobal.com/science/intelligent-driving. Accessed May 2022

  8. https://www.pedestrian.melbourne.vic.gov.au/. Accessed May 2022

  9. Ma, H., Zeng, C., Ling, C.X.: A reliable people counting system via multiple cameras. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 3, 1–22 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kristoffersen, M.S., Dueholm, J. V., Gade, R., Moeslund, T.B.: Pedestrian counting with occlusion handling using stereo thermal cameras. Sensors (Switzerland). 16, 62 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X., Eckert, M., Martinez, J.F., Rubio, G.: Context aware middleware architectures: survey and challenges. Sensors (Switzerland) 15, 20570–20607 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Javaid, S., Afzal, H., Arif, F., Iltaf, N., Abbas, H., Iqbal, W.: CATSWoTS: context aware trustworthy social web of things system. Sensors (Switzerland) 19, (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kowshalya, A.M., Valarmathi, M.L.: Trust management in the social internet of things. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 96, 2681–2691 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Miorandi, D., Cappiello, C., Coen-Porisini, A.: A secure and quality-aware prototypical architecture for the Internet of Things. Inf. Syst. 58, 43–55 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marie, P., Lim, L., Manzoor, A., Chabridon, S., Conan, D., Desprats, T.: QoC-aware context data distribution in the internet of things. In: 2014 Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Middleware for Context-Aware Applications in the IoT, pp. 13–18. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Filho, J., Miron, A., Satoh, I., Gensel, J., Martin, H.: Modeling and measuring quality of context information in pervasive environments. In: 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 690–697. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marie, Pierrick, Desprats, Thierry, Chabridon, Sophie, Sibilla, Michelle: QoCIM: A Meta-model for Quality of Context. In: Brézillon, Patrick, Blackburn, Patrick, Dapoigny, Richard (eds.) CONTEXT 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8175, pp. 302–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40972-1_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Jagarlamudi, K.S., Zaslavsky, A., Loke, S.W., Hassani, A., Medvedev, A.: Quality and cost aware service selection in IoT-context management platforms. In: 2021 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing & Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical & Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics), pp. 89–98. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hossain, M.A., Atrey, P.K., El Saddik, A.: Learning multi-sensor confidence using difference of opinions. In: 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, pp. 809–813. IEEE, (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yasar, A.U.H., Paridel, K., Preuveneers, D., Berbers, Y.: When efficiency matters: towards quality of context-aware peers for adaptive communication in VANETs. In: 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1006–1012. IEEE, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. https://github.com/IBA-Group-IT/IoT-data-simulator . Accessed May (2022)

  22. Hassani, A., et al.: Context-as-a-Service Platform: exchange and share context in an IoT ecosystem. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 385–390. IEEE, (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. FIWARE - Open APIs for Open Minds. https://www.fiware.org/. Accessed 27 (2022)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanaka Sai Jagarlamudi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sai Jagarlamudi, K., Zaslavsky, A., Loke, S.W., Hassani, A., Medvedev, A. (2022). ConQeng: A Middleware for Quality of Context Aware Selection, Measurement and Validation. In: González-Vidal, A., Mohamed Abdelgawad, A., Sabir, E., Ziegler, S., Ladid, L. (eds) Internet of Things. GIoTS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13533. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20936-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20936-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20935-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20936-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics