Skip to main content

Fuzzy Classifier for Speech Assessment in Speech Rehabilitation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2022)

Abstract

The article describes the use of a fuzzy classifier as a mechanism for combining the values calculated from three metrics to obtain a quantitative assessment of the intelligibility of the syllable pronunciation. The resulting assessment is used to assess speech in speech rehabilitation after the treatment of the oral cavity and oropharynx oncology. The evaluation is based on the calculation of the distance as the similarity degree between the syllable pronunciation in the estimated recording (the patient’s speech in the process of rehabilitation) and the syllable pronunciation in the reference recording (the patient’s speech before surgery). It is proposed to use a fuzzy classifier with the genetic optimization algorithm NSGA II. The training datasets are quantitative and expert estimates of a set of syllable pronunciation recordings provided by the Cancer Research Institute Tomsk NRMC. Three datasets were used: 1020 recordings for each of the problematic phonemes [k], [s], [t]. Separate fuzzy classifiers were trained for each of the datasets. Classification accuracies are shown on the initial datasets and rebalanced datasets. The NeighborhoodCleaningRule and SMOTEENN algorithms were used for rebalancing the data. It was concluded that it is possible to use a fuzzy classifier as a combination mechanism to obtain the intelligibility assessment of the syllable pronunciation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaprin, A.D., Starinskiy, V.V., Shahzadova, A.O.: Malignancies in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality), 252 p. MNIOI name of P.A. Herzen, Moscow (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaprin, A.D., Starinskiy, V.V., Shahzadova, A.O.: The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2020, 239 p. MNIOI name of P.A. Herzen, Moscow (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Standard GOST R 50840-95 voice over paths of communication. Methods for assessing the quality, legibility and recognition, 234 p. Publishing Standards, Moscow (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salvador, S.: FastDTW: toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. In: Salvador, S., Chan, P. (eds.) Workshop on Mining Temporal and Sequential Data, Seattle, pp. 70–80 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kostyuchenko, E., Meshcheryakov, R., Ignatieva, D., Pyatkov, A., Choynzonov, E., Balatskaya, L.: Correlation criterion in assessment of speech quality in process of oncological patients rehabilitation after surgical treatment of the speech-producing tract. In: Bhatia, S.K., Tiwari, S., Mishra, K.K., Trivedi, M.C. (eds.) Advances in Computer Communication and Computational Sciences. AISC, vol. 759, pp. 209–216. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0341-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kostyuchenko, E., Roman, M., Ignatieva, D., Pyatkov, A., Choynzonov, E., Balatskaya, L.: Evaluation of the speech quality during rehabilitation after surgical treatment of the cancer of oral cavity and oropharynx based on a comparison of the Fourier spectra. In: Ronzhin, A., Potapova, R., Németh, G. (eds.) SPECOM 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9811, pp. 287–295. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43958-7_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Novokhrestova, D., Kostuchenko, E., Hodashinsky, I., Balatskaya, L.: Experimental analysis of expert and quantitative estimates of syllable recordings in the process of speech rehabilitation. In: Karpov, A., Potapova, R. (eds.) SPECOM 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12997, pp. 483–491. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87802-3_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarin, K.S., Hodashinsky, I.A.: Bagged ensemble of fuzzy classifiers and feature selection for handwritten signature verification. Comput. Opt. 43(5), 833–845 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavygina, A., Hodashinsky, I.: Hybrid algorithm for fuzzy model parameter estimation based on genetic algorithm and derivative based methods. In: ECTA 2011 and FCTA 2011 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Theory and Applications and International Conference on Fuzzy Computation Theory and Applications, pp. 513–515 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Georgieva, P.: Genetic fuzzy system for financial management. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 18(2), 20–35 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Omozaki, Y., Masuyama, N., Nojima, Y., Ishibuchi, H.: Multiobjective fuzzy genetics-based machine learning for multi-label classification. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nishihara, A., Masuyama, N., Nojima, Y., Ishibuchi, H.: Michigan-style fuzzy genetics-based machine learning for class imbalance data. J. Jpn. Soc. Fuzzy Theory Intell. Inform. 33(1), 525–530 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemnaru, C., Potolea, R.: Imbalanced classification problems: systematic study, issues and best practices. In: Zhang, R., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 102, pp. 35–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29958-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Imbalanced-learn documentation, 10 April 2022. https://imbalanced-learn.org/stable/introduction.html

  16. Irkutsk Supercomputer Center SB RAS. http://hpc.icc.ru/en/. Accessed 16 Jan 2021

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of scientific projects carried out by teams of research laboratories of educational institutions of higher education subordinate to the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project number FEWM-2020-0042.

The authors would like to thank the Irkutsk Supercomputer Center of SB RAS for providing access to the HPC-cluster «Akademik V.M. Matrosov» [16].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariya Novokhrestova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Novokhrestova, D., Hodashinsky, I., Kostyuchenko, E., Sarin, K., Bardamova, M. (2022). Fuzzy Classifier for Speech Assessment in Speech Rehabilitation. In: Prasanna, S.R.M., Karpov, A., Samudravijaya, K., Agrawal, S.S. (eds) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13721. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20980-2_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20980-2_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20979-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20980-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics