Abstract
Blockchain technology offers efficient solutions for a multitude of use-cases, but one of the most successful areas in which this technology has been applied is the field of decentralized finance (DeFi). Decentralized exchanges allow a large number of users to exchange one cryptocurrency for another, without the need for any central authority with any degree of control over the process. Although many different models of decentralized exchanges have been proposed, the Automated Market Maker model currently seems to be the most widely applicable and, therefore, successful. As in the classical financial world, companies and projects may seek to solicit or provide market making services for various trading pairs on exchanges. While for orderbook-based exchanges, the execution of such services is studied deeply and rather straightforward, for AMMs the process becomes more complicated. To solve this, different approaches to market making are offered by the Pathway protocol, focused on two major goals: first, to bring the token price for a particular trading pair to a certain target price, and second, to keep the liquidity of that trading pair intact. The original publication on the Pathway protocol describes its design and goals in detail, but lacks mathematical evidence that the protocol is formally capable of achieving these goals. Therefore, this paper delves a little deeper into the mathematical background of the protocol and formally proves its most important characteristics claimed by the original paper. Last but not least, this paper provides a more in depth discussion of the benefits and limitations of the Pathway protocol, based on the presented mathematical foundations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, 21260 (2008)
Werner, S.M., Perez, D., Gudgeon, L., Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., Knottenbelt, W.J.: SoK: Decentralized Finance (DEFI) (2021) [online]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08778
Jansen, M., Hdhili, F., Gouiaa, R., Qasem, Z.: Do smart contract languages need to be Turing complete? In: International Congress on Blockchain and Applications, pp. 19–26. Springer, Cham (2019)
Ross, S.A.: The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. J. Econ. Theory 13, 341–360 (1976)
Dolgopolov, S.: Insider trading: informed trading, and market making: liquidity of securities markets in the zero-sum game. Wm. Mary Bus. Law Rev. 3, 1 (2012)
Pupyshev, A., Sapranidi, I., Khalilov, S.: Pathway: a protocol for algorithmic pricing of a DAO governance token (2022) [online]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06541
Buterin, V.: On Path Independence (2017) [online]. Available at: https://vitalik.ca/general/2017/06/22/marketmakers.html
Xu, J., Vavryk, N., Paruch, K., Cousaert, S.: SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols (2021) [online]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12732
Adams, H.: Uniswap Whitepaper (v1) (2018) [online]. Available at: https://hackmd.io/C-DvwDSfSxuh-Gd4WKE_ig
Egorov, M.: StableSwap - efficient mechanism for Stablecoin liquidity (2019) [online]. Available at: https://curve.fi/files/stableswap-paper.pdf
DODO Team: DODO - A Next-Generation On-Chain Liquidity Provider Powered by Pro-active Market Maker Algorithm (2020) [online]. Available at: https://dodoex.github.io/docs/docs/whitepaper/
Zhou, L., Qin, K., Torres, C.F., Le, D.V., Gervais, A.: High-frequency trading on decentralized on-chain exchanges. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 428–445. IEEE (2021)
Chitra, T., Kulkarni, K., Angeris, G., Evans, A., Xu, V.: DeFi Liquidity Management via Optimal Control: Ohm as a Case Study (2022)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jansen, M., Sapranidi, I., Pupyshev, A. (2023). Proofs and Limitations of the Pathway Protocol. In: Prieto, J., Benítez Martínez, F.L., Ferretti, S., Arroyo Guardeño, D., Tomás Nevado-Batalla, P. (eds) Blockchain and Applications, 4th International Congress . BLOCKCHAIN 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 595. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21229-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21229-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21228-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21229-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)