Abstract
Emotion and sentiment analysis tools offer the possibility of detecting emotion in several ways. In this paper, we study IBM Watson’s Natural Language Understanding (Emotion and Sentiment), and CoreNLP’s Sentiment Analysis accuracy levels against an annotated dataset, so as to observe any difference when comparing a discrete emotion classification approach (Watson’s Emotion) versus a one-dimensional approach (Watson and CoreNLP’s Sentiment). We have found that one-dimensional approaches were more accurate (85.5% for Watson, 62.7% for CoreNLP) than the discrete approach (37.6%). Being aware of those accuracy rates, and how they classified those emotions, we use those same services to analyse Tinder biographies, and observe how users present themselves, and finally applying clustering algorithms to analyse any trends between the emotion and sentiment of their biographies and other markers, such as age, gender, location, etc. After analysing the biographies, we have observed a tendency for more Neutral presentations (45–70%), followed by Positive (15–38%) presentations, though IBM Watson’s sentiment over classified joyful presentations (73%). In terms of clustering, we observe three distinct groups according to the emotional tone of their biographies, and the information provided. With this, we aim to contribute a better understanding on how two widely used emotion and sentiment analysis tools compare against each other, and how users can be classified according to the emotional/sentiment tones of their biographies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Picard, R.W.: Affective computing. MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 321 (1995)
Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (2014)
Islam, M.R., Zibran, M.F. DEVA: sensing emotions in the valence arousal space in software engineering text. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM symposium on applied computing (2018)
Russell, J.A., Mehrabian, A.: Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. J. Res. Pers. 11(3), 273–294 (1977)
Barnett, L., DatingZest for Tinder Statistics in 2022 & Fun Facts That You Didn’t Know Before. https://datingzest.com/tinder-statistics/#:~:text=Tinder%20has%2075%20million%20users,each%20day%20on%20the%20app. Accessed 21 Aug 2022
Page, M.J., et al.: PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, vol. 372 (2021)
Neyt, B., Baert, S., Vandenbulcke, S.: Never mind I’ll find someone like me–Assortative mating preferences on Tinder. Personality Individ. Differ. 155, 109739 (2020)
Dai, M., Robbins, R.: Exploring the influences of profile perceptions and different pick-up lines on dating outcomes on Tinder: an online experiment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 117, 106667 (2021)
Van Berlo, Z.M., Ranzini, G.: Big dating: A computational approach to examine gendered self-presentation on Tinder. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society, pp. 390–394. ACM, Copenhagen, Denmark (2018)
Tyson, G., Perta, V.C., Haddadi, H., Seto, M.C.: A first look at user activity on tinder. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) pp. 461–466. IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA (2016)
Freyth, L., Batinic, B.: How bright and dark personality traits predict dating app behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ. 168 (2021)
Chin, K., Edelstein, R.S., Vernon, P.A.: Attached to dating apps: Attachment orientations and preferences for dating apps. Mobile Media Commun. 7(1), 41–59 (2019)
Stoicescu, M., Rughiniș, C.: Learning about self and society through online dating platforms. In: 16th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education. Bucharest, Romania (2020)
Rochat, L., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Aboujaoude, E., Khazaal, Y.: The psychology of “swiping”: a cluster analysis of the mobile dating app Tinder. J. Behav. Addict. 8(4), 804–813 (2019)
Johnson, E., González, I., Mondéjar, T., Cabañero-Gómez, L., Fontecha, J., Hervás, R.: An Affective and Cognitive Toy to Support Mood Disorders. In Informatics, vol. 7, p. 48, MDPI (2020)
Acknowledgements
This project has been funded through the PTA2020–018436-I technical support personnel contract from the MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA E INNOVACIÓN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Johnson, E., Barragan, A., Villa, L., Fontecha, J., Gonzalez, I., Hervas, R. (2023). “Matching Learning”: Profiling and Clustering Users on Tinder Based on Emotion and Sentiment Analysis. In: Bravo, J., Ochoa, S., Favela, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing & Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI 2022). UCAmI 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 594. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21333-5_87
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21333-5_87
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21332-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21333-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)