Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

From Ontology to Knowledge Graph Trend: Ontology as Foundation Layer for Knowledge Graph

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web (KGSWC 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1686))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ontology and Knowledge Graph (KG) are two hotspot topics in Semantic Web and Artificial Intelligence (AI) fields. They have gained their importance due to the thriving development of the Internet in this century coupled with the explosive growth of data, which leads to increased demand for ontologies or KG to promote the Semantic Web and AI applications. Many researchers conflate ontology with KG, especially when even Wikipedia refers to both terms as synonymous; however, the difference is obvious. In this paper, we will highlight the differences between ontology and KG. Also, we have provided a redefinition for the ontology tuple and explained how the ontology is a foundation layer for KG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ontology Web Language.

  2. 2.

    Resource Description Framework.

  3. 3.

    Resource Description Framework Schema.

  4. 4.

    http://graphdb.net/.

  5. 5.

    https://webscripts.softpedia.com/script/Database-Tools/FlockDB-66248.html.

  6. 6.

    https://neo4j.com/.

References

  1. Ahmed, I.A., et al.: Arabic knowledge graph construction: a close look in the present and into the future. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2022). iSSN: 1319–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.04.007

  2. Albukhitan, S., Helmy, T., Alnazer, A.: Arabic ontology learning using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, 3109052, pp. 1138–1142. ACM (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3109052

  3. Arefyev, N., et al.: Neural GRANNy at SemEval-2019 task 2: a combined approach for better modeling of semantic relationships in semantic frame induction. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 31–38 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Astrakhantsev, N A., Yu Turdakov, D.: Automatic construction and enrichment of informal ontologies: a survey. Program. Comput. Softw. 39(1), 34–42 (2013). issn: 1608–3261. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768813010039

  5. Al-Aswadi, F.N., Chan, H.Y., Gan, K.H.: Automatic ontology construction from text: a review from shallow to deep learning trend. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53(6), 3901–3928 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09782-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AL-Aswadi, F.N., Chan, H.Y., Gan, K.H.: Extracting semantic concepts and relations from scientific publications by using deep learning. In: Saeed, F., Mohammed, F., Al-Nahari, A. (eds.) IRICT 2020. LNDECT, vol. 72, pp. 374–383. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70713-2_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, B.: Ontology learning from text: an overview. Ontology Learn. Methods Eval. Appl. 123, 3–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cimiano, P., Völker, J.: Text2Onto. In: Montoyo, A., Muńoz, R., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2005. LNCS, vol. 3513, pp. 227–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11428817_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. De Donato, R., et al.: QueDI: from knowledge graph querying to data visualization. In: SEMANTiCS, pp. 70–86 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du, Y., et al.: Knowledge extract and ontology construction method of assembly process text. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 355. EDP Sciences (2022). ISBN: 2274-7214

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrlinger, L., Wöß, W.: Towards a definition of knowledge graphs. SEMANTiCS (Posters, Demos, SuCCESS) 48(1-4), 2 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Färber, M., et al.: Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. Seman. Web 9(1), 77–129 (2018). issn: 1570–0844

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferré, S.,. Sparklis: an expressive query builder for SPARQL endpoints with guidance in natural language. Seman. Web 8(3), 405–418 (2017). issn: 1570–0844

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993). issn: 1042–8143

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hitzler, P.: A review of the semantic web field. Commun. ACM 64(2), 76–83 (2021). ISSN: 0001–0782. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397512

  17. Ji, S., et al.: A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition and applications. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 33(2) 494–514 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843

  18. Jiang, X., Tan, A.H.: CRCTOL: a semantic-based domain ontology learning system. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(1), 150–168 (2010). ISSN: 1532–2890

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kasenchak, B., Lehnert, A.E.: ontology for knowledge graphs. Online Webinar (2021). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qIBex7a0kE

  20. Kondylakis, H., et al. Delta: a modular ontology evaluation system. Information 12(8), 301 (2021). ISSN: 2078–2489

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lan, N., et al.: Research on knowledge graphs with concept lattice constraints. Symmetry 13(12), 2363 (2021). ISSN: 2073–8994

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann, J., et al.: DBpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Seman. Web 6(2), 167–195 (2015). ISSN 1570–0844

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Z., Han, X.: Deep learning in knowledge graph. In: Deng, L., Liu, Y. (eds.) Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing, pp. 117–145. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5209-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Browarnik, A., Maimon, O.: Ontology learning from text: why the ontology learning layer cake is not viable. Int. J. Signs Semiot. Syst. 4(2) 1–14 (2015). ISSN: 2155–5028. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsss.2015070101

  25. Nickel, M., et al.: A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proc. IEEE 104(1), 11–33 (2016). ISSN: 1558–2256. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2483592

  26. Sören, A., et al.: Towards a knowledge graph for science. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. Association for Computing Machinery, p. 3227689. https://doi.org/10.1145/3227609

  27. Subhashini, R., Akilandeswari, J.: A survey on ontology construction methodologies. Int. J. Enterp. Comput. Bus. Syst. 11, 60–72 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, 1242667, pp. 697–706. ACM (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242667

  29. Tiwari, S., Al-Aswadi, F.N., Gaurav, D.: Recent trends in knowledge graphs: theory and practice. Soft Comput. 25(13), 8337–8355 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05756-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiwari, S., Gaurav, D., Srivastava, A., Rai, C., Abhishek, K.: A preliminary study of knowledge graphs and their construction. In: Tavares, J.M.R.S., Chakrabarti, S., Bhattacharya, A., Ghatak, S. (eds.) Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security. LNNS, vol. 164, pp. 11–20. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9774-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Völker, J., Fernandez Langa, S., Sure, Y.: Supporting the construction of Spanish legal ontologies with Text2Onto. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 105–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong, W., Liu, W., Bennamoun, M.: Ontology learning from text: a look back and into the future. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 44(4), 20 (2012). ISSN: 0360–0300

    Google Scholar 

  33. Alavijeh, Z.Z.: The application of link mining in social network analysis. In: 2015. p. 6 (2015), ISSN: 2322–5157

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zou, X.: A survey on application of knowledge graph. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1487, 012016 (2020). ISSN: 1742–6588 1742–6596. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1487/1/012016

  35. Zouaq, A.: An overview of shallow and deep natural language processing for ontology learning. In: Wong, W., Liu, W., Bennamoun, M. (eds.) Ontology Learning and Knowledge Discovery using the Web: Challenges and Recent Advances, vol. 2. USA, Information Science Reference (IGI Global), Chap. 2, pp. 16–37 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

    Fatima N. AL-Aswadi, Huah Yong Chan & Keng Hoon Gan

  2. Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Hodeidah University, P.O. Box 3114, Hodeidah, Yemen

    Fatima N. AL-Aswadi

Authors
  1. Fatima N. AL-Aswadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huah Yong Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keng Hoon Gan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huah Yong Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. EY wavespace/UNIR, Madrid, Spain

    Boris Villazón-Terrazas

  2. Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico

    Fernando Ortiz-Rodriguez

  3. Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico

    Sanju Tiwari

  4. University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain

    Miguel-Angel Sicilia

  5. Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain

    David Martín-Moncunill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

AL-Aswadi, F.N., Chan, H.Y., Gan, K.H. (2022). From Ontology to Knowledge Graph Trend: Ontology as Foundation Layer for Knowledge Graph. In: Villazón-Terrazas, B., Ortiz-Rodriguez, F., Tiwari, S., Sicilia, MA., Martín-Moncunill, D. (eds) Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web . KGSWC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1686. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21422-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21422-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21421-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21422-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics