Skip to main content

Duplication Scheduling with Bottom-Up Top-Down Recursive Neural Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2022 (IDEAL 2022)

Abstract

Scientific workflows can be represented as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) with nodes corresponding to individual tasks and directed edges between the nodes signifying the order of task execution. The nodes contain informative attributes related to task-specific data transfer/storage and scheduling length. Given an available amount of (cloud) computational resources, the overall workflow scheduling length can sometimes be reduced by making certain “critical tasks” run in parallel (task duplication) on multiple resources. In this way, a carefully designed spread of computational effort across the resources can result in a more efficient computational structure and hence a shorter scheduling length. However, task duplication algorithms deciding which tasks to duplicate in a given workflow can themselves be computationally expensive. Here we propose a novel Bottom-Up Top-Down Recursive Neural Network (BUTD RecNN) model that is able to learn from historical duplication decisions on workflows (represented as DAGs) to efficiently produce duplication recommendations for new unseen workflows. The approach is tested on collections of Montage workflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The number of recursive connections of a recursive neuron should be equal to the \(max\_degree\) of the domain D, even if not all of them will be used for computing the output of a vertex v with \(out\_deg(v)< max\_degree\).

References

  1. Berriman, G.B., et al.: Montage: a grid enabled image mosaic service for the national virtual observatory. Astronom. Data Analysis Softw. Systs. 314, 593 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bottou, L.: From machine learning to machine reasoning. Technical report. arXiv. 1102.1808. pp. 394–396 (2011). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1102.1808

  3. Bozdag, D., Ozguner, F., Ekici, E., Catalyurek, U.A.: task duplication based scheduling algorithm using partial schedules, In: International Conference on Parallel Processing, pp. 630–637 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.2005.15

  4. Calheiros, R. N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C. A. F., Buyya, R., CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw. Pract. Exper. Vol. 41, 1, pp. 23–50. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.995

  5. Darbha, S., Agrawal, D.P.: A fast and scalable scheduling algorithm for distributed memory systems. In: Proceedings Seventh IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, pp. 60–63 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1995.530665

  6. Deelman, E.: The future of scientific workflows. Int. J. High Performance Comput. Appl. 32(1), 159–175 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira da Silva, R., Filgueira, R., Pietri, I., Jiang, M., Sakellariou, R., Deelman, E.: A Characterization of Work-flow Management Systems for Extreme-Scale Applications. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 5, 228–238 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frasconi, P., Gori, M., Sperduti, A.: On the efficient classification of data structures by neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence - Volume 2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1066–1071 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishfaq, A., Yu-Kwong, K.: On exploiting task duplication in parallel program schedulingIEEE . Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 9(9), 872–892 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/71.722221

  10. Juve, G., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Bharathi, S., Mehta, G., Vahi, K.: Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 29(3), 682–692 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.08.015

  11. Kruatrachue, B., Lewis, T.: Grain size determination for parallel processing. IEEE Softw. 5(1), 23–32 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/52.1991

  12. Li, G., Chen, D., Wang, D., Zhang, D.: Task clustering and scheduling to multiprocessors with duplication, In: Proceedings International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 8 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2003.1213079

  13. Pollack, J.B.: Recursive distributed representations. Artif. Intell. 46(1–2), 77–105 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90005-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shirazi, B., Wang, M., Pathak, G.: Analysis and evaluation of heuristic methods for static task scheduling. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 10(3), 222–232 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-7315(90)90014-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Socher, R., Huang, E.H., Pennington, J., Ng, A.Y., Manning, C.D.: Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection, In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, pp. 801–809 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., Potts, C.: Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank, In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, Washington, USA, pp. 1631–1642 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sperduti, A., Starita, A.: Supervised neural networks for the classification of structures. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 8(3), 714–735 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/72.572108

  18. Yao, F., Pu, C., Zhang, Z.: Task Duplication-Based Scheduling Algorithm for Budget-Constrained Workflows in Cloud Computing. IEEE Access 9, 37262–37272 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063456

  19. Yeh-Ching C., Ranka, S.: Applications and performance analysis of a compile-time optimization approach for list scheduling algorithms on distributed memory multiprocessors, In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, pp. 512–521 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1109/SUPERC.1992.236653

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahab Samandi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Samandi, V., Tiňo, P., Bahsoon, R. (2022). Duplication Scheduling with Bottom-Up Top-Down Recursive Neural Network. In: Yin, H., Camacho, D., Tino, P. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2022. IDEAL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13756. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21752-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21753-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics