Skip to main content

EduBot: A Proof-of-Concept for a High School Motivational Agent

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2022 (IDEAL 2022)

Abstract

Motivation appears to plays a role in student dropout. This paper uses a dataset with high school information (756 entries) for creating a model that relates year failures with the other features on the dataset. The resulting model, based on XGBoost, shows that the top-ranked features are related with motivation issues corroborating with the initial observation. In this sense, a digital assistant embedded with a motivation module may aid on improving motivation and on avoiding dropout. In other words, if the predictor detects year failure possibility it start to act on motivating the student. Considering this paper being direct to underage students, this paper stops on the proof-of-concept level considering the actual dialogues and live tests are expected to performed with the support of educational psychologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://rasa.com/docs/rasa/.

References

  1. Bruno, V., Maria, A.B., Hugo, F., Francisco, S.M., Dalila, D., Paulo, N.: A systematic review on student failure prediction. In: Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Workshops - 12th International Conference

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sokkhey, P., Okazaki, T.: Developing web-based support systems for predicting poor-performing students using educational data mining techniques. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 11, 23–32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Embarak, O.: Towards an adaptive education through a machine learning recommendation system. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) 2021, pp. 187–192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIIC51459.2021.9415211

  4. Siddique, A., Jan, A., Majeed, F., Qahmash, A., Quadri, N.N., Wahab, M.: Predicting academic performance using an efficient model based on fusion of classifiers. Appl. Sci. 11, 11845 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Majjate, H., Jeghal, A., Yahyaouy, A.: Predicting factors affecting student’s performance in a learning management system. Indian J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 12, 1771–1779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21817/indjcse/2021/v12i6/211206015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Begum, S., Padmannavar, S.: Genetically optimized ensemble classifiers for multiclass student performance prediction. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 15(2), 316–328 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2022.0430.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de la Peña, D., Lizcano, D., Martínez-Álvarez, I.: Learning through play: gamification model in university-level distance learning. Entertain. Comput. 39, 100430 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morschheuser, B., Werder, K., Hamari, J., Abe, J.: How to gamify? A method for designing gamification. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2017), pp. 1298–1307 (2017). www.hdl.handle.net/10125/41308

  9. Pérez-Marín, D., Pascual-Nieto, I.: An exploratory study on how children interact with pedagogic conversational agents. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32(9), 955–964 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.687774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, C.-I., Chen, I.-P., Hsieh, C.-M., Liao, C.-N.: Design aspects of scoring systems in game. Art Des. Rev. 05(01), 26–43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2017.51003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, J., Herger, M.: Mechanics. In: Gamification at Work: Designing Engaging Business Software. www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/gamification-at-work-designing-engaging-business-software/chapter-6-58-mechanics. Accessed 05 Sept 2021

  12. Krstajic, D., Buturovic, L.J., Leahy, D.E., Thomas, S.: Cross-validation pitfalls when selecting and assessing regression and classification models. J. Cheminformatics 6(1), 1–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Awan, A., Shaheen, N.: The impacts of mother’s education on the academic achievements of her child. Glob. J. Manag. Soc. Sci. Human. 6, 735–756 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sweeney, C., et al.: Can chatbots help support a person’s mental health? Perceptions and views from mental healthcare professionals and experts. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthc. 2(3), 15 (2021). Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453175

  15. Fitzpatrick, K., Darcy, A., Vierhile, M.: Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment. Health 4(2), e19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785. www.mental.jmir.org/2017/2/e19

  16. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Syst. Appl. 33(1), 135–146 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohamad, S.K., Tasir, Z.: Educational data mining: a review. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 97, 320–324 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dutt, A., Ismail, M.A., Herawan, T.: A systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access 5, 15991–16005 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nogareda, A.M., Camacho, D.: Optimizing satisfaction in a multi-courses allocation problem combined with a timetabling problem. Soft. Comput. 21(17), 4873–4882 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2375-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasheminejad, S.M., Sarvmili, M.: S3PSO: students’ performance prediction based on particle swarm optimization. J. AI Data Min. 7(1), 77–96 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nogareda, A.M., Camacho, D.: A constraint-based approach for classes setting-up problems in secondary schools. Int. J. Simul. Model 16(2), 253–262 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the R &D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalila Durães .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Faria, H. et al. (2022). EduBot: A Proof-of-Concept for a High School Motivational Agent. In: Yin, H., Camacho, D., Tino, P. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2022. IDEAL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13756. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21752-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21753-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics