Skip to main content

Extracting Information about Research Resources from Scholarly Papers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
From Born-Physical to Born-Virtual: Augmenting Intelligence in Digital Libraries (ICADL 2022)

Abstract

This paper presents a method to extract information about research resource metadata from scholarly papers to expand research resource repositories using an academic knowledge graph. Here, we considered the hypothesis that information extracted from scholarly papers is beneficial to expand research resource repositories from two perspectives: (1) the amount of information in existing metadata, and (2) the number of entries in existing repositories. We constructed an academic knowledge graph, where the nodes and directed edges in the graph correspond to the entities and their relations in scholarly papers, respectively. To verify our hypothesis, we constructed a knowledge graph using 15,721 papers published in international conferences. We then investigated the expandability of a language resource metadata repository using the constructed knowledge graph. The experimental results demonstrated that the constructed knowledge graph could be used to enrich the descriptions of metadata and increase the number of entries in the repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu.

  2. 2.

    https://scholar.google.com.

  3. 3.

    https://www.semanticscholar.org.

  4. 4.

    https://cir.nii.ac.jp.

  5. 5.

    https://schema.org.

  6. 6.

    https://jpcoar.repo.nii.ac.jp.

  7. 7.

    https://github.com/pd3f/dehyphen.

  8. 8.

    In addition, if the entity matched a language name included in the ISO 639–3 language code (https://iso639-3.sil.org), it was excluded.

  9. 9.

    This means that there may be approximately 4,000 LR entities in E.

References

  1. Abekawa, T., Aizawa, A.: SideNoter: scholarly paper browsing system based on PDF restructuring and text annotation. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 136–140. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee, Osaka, Japan (2016). https://aclanthology.org/C16-2029

  2. Augenstein, I., Das, M., Riedel, S., Vikraman, L., McCallum, A.: SemEval 2017 task 10: scienceie - extracting keyphrases and relations from scientific publications. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), pp. 546–555. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S17-2091

  3. Beltagy, I., Lo, K., Cohan, A.: SciBERT: a pretrained language model for scientific text. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 3615–3620. Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1371

  4. Chapman, A., et al.: Dataset search: a survey. VLDB J. 29(1), 251–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-019-00564-x

  5. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423

  6. Du, C., Cohoon, J., Lopez, P., Howison, J.: Softcite dataset: a dataset of software mentions in biomedical and economic research publications. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 72(7), 870–884 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24454. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i7p870-884.html

  7. Du, C., Howison, J., Lopez, P.: Softcite: automatic extraction of software mentions in research literature (2020). https://scinlp.org/history/2020/pdfs/softcite-automatic-extraction-of-software-mentions-in-researchliterature.pdf

  8. Eberts, M., Ulges, A.: Span-based joint entity and relation extraction with transformer pre-training (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gábor, K., Buscaldi, D., Schumann, A.K., QasemiZadeh, B., Zargayouna, H., Charnois, T.: SemEval-2018 task 7: semantic relation extraction and classification in scientific papers. In: Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 679–688. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S18-1111

  10. Gurulingappa, H., Rajput, A.M., Roberts, A., Fluck, J., Hofmann-Apitius, M., Toldo, L.: Development of a benchmark corpus to support the automatic extraction of drug-related adverse effects from medical case reports. J. Biomed. Inf. 45(5), 885–892 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heddes, J., Meerdink, P., Pieters, M., Marx, M.: The automatic detection of dataset names in scientific articles. Data 6(8), 84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/data6080084. https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/6/8/84

  12. Ikeda, D., Nagamizo, K., Taniguchi, Y.: Automatic identification of dataset names in scholarly articles of various disciplines. Int. J. Inst. Res. Manage. 4(1), 17–30 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ikoma, T., Matsubara, S.: Identification of research data references based on citation contexts. In: Ishita, E., Pang, N.L.S., Zhou, L. (eds.) ICADL 2020. LNCS, vol. 12504, pp. 149–156. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kozawa, S., Tohyama, H., Uchimoto, K., Matsubara, S.: Automatic acquisition of usage information for language resources. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Marrakech, Morocco (2008). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/pdf/169_paper.pdf

  16. Kozawa, S., Tohyama, H., Uchimoto, K., Matsubara, S.: Collection of usage information for language resources from academic articles. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2010). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta, Malta (2010). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2010/pdf/746_Paper.pdf

  17. Li, K., Yan, E.: Co-mention network of R packages: scientific impact and clustering structure. J. Informetrics 12(1), 87–100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157717304108

  18. Luan, Y., He, L., Ostendorf, M., Hajishirzi, H.: Multi-task identification of entities, relations, and coreference for scientific knowledge graph construction. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 3219–3232. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1360

  19. Noy, N., Burgess, M., Brickley, D.: Google dataset search: building a search engine for datasets in an open web ecosystem. In: 28th Web Conference (WebConf 2019) (2019). https://datasetsearch.research.google.com

  20. Prasad, A., Si, C., Kan, M.Y.: Dataset mention extraction and classification. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Extracting Structured Knowledge from Scientific Publications, pp. 31–36. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2604

  21. Roth, D., Yih, W.T.: A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2004) at HLT-NAACL 2004, pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (2004). https://aclanthology.org/W04-2401

  22. Sadvilkar, N., Neumann, M.: PySBD: pragmatic sentence boundary disambiguation. In: Proceedings of Second Workshop for NLP Open Source Software (NLP-OSS), pp. 110–114. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.nlposs-1.15

  23. Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., Birch, A.: Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 1: Long Papers), pp. 1715–1725. Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1162

  24. Singhal, A., Srivastava, J.: Data extract: mining context from the web for dataset extraction. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. 3(2) 219–223 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tohyama, H., Kozawa, S., Uchimoto, K., Matsubara, S., Isahara, H.: Construction of an infrastructure for providing users with suitable language resources. In: Coling 2008: Companion volume: Posters, pp. 119–122. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee, Manchester, UK (2008). https://aclanthology.org/C08-2030

  26. Tohyama, H., Kozawa, S., Uchimoto, K., Shigeki, M., Hitoshi, I.: Shachi: a large scale metadata database of language resources. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Global Interoperabikity for Language resources (ICGL-2008), pp. 205–212 (2008). http://shachi.org

  27. Tsunokake, M., Matsubara, S.: Classification of URLs citing research artifacts in scholarly documents based on distributed representations. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents (EEKE2021) collocated with ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL2021), vol. 3004, pp. 20–25 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. 6000–6010. NIPS2017, Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (No. 21H03773) of the JSPS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayahito Saji .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saji, A., Matsubara, S. (2022). Extracting Information about Research Resources from Scholarly Papers. In: Tseng, YH., Katsurai, M., Nguyen, H.N. (eds) From Born-Physical to Born-Virtual: Augmenting Intelligence in Digital Libraries. ICADL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13636. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21756-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21756-2_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21755-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21756-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics