Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Study of Classification and Clustering Methods from Text of Books

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13758))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Book collections in libraries are an important means of information, but without proper assignment of books into appropriate categories, searching for books on similar topics is very troublesome for both librarians and readers. This is a difficult problem due to the analysis of large sets of real text data, such as the content of books. For this purpose, we propose to create an appropriate model system, the use of which will allow for automatic assignment of books to appropriate categories by analyzing the text from the content of the books. Our research was tested on a database consisting of 552 documents. Each document contains the full content of the book. All books are from Project Gutenberg in the Art, Biology, Mathematics, Philosophy, or Technology category. Well-known techniques of natural language processing (NLP) were used for the proper preprocessing of the book content and for data analysis. Then, two different machine learning approaches were used: classification (as supervised learning) and clustering (as unsupervised learning) in order to properly assign books to selected categories. Measures of accuracy, precision and recall were used to evaluate the quality of classification. In our research, good classification results were obtained, even above 90% accuracy. Also, the use of clustering algorithms allowed for effective assignment of books to categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.gutenberg.org/.

References

  1. Amer, A.A., Abdalla, H.I.: A set theory based similarity measure for text clustering and classification. J. Big Data 7(1), 1–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00344-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amirhosseini, M.H., Kazemian, H.: Automating the process of identifying the preferred representational system in neuro linguistic programming using natural language processing. Cogn. Process. 20(2), 175–193 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bean, R.: The use of Project Gutenberg and hexagram statistics to help solve famous unsolved ciphers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Historical Cryptology HistoCrypt 2020, pp. 31–35. No. 171. Linköping University Electronic Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bedekar, P.P., Bhide, S.R.: Optimum coordination of directional overcurrent relays using the hybrid GA-NLP approach. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 26(1), 109–119 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2), 123–140 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooke, J., Hammond, A., Hirst, G.: GutenTag: an NLP-driven tool for digital humanities research in the Project Gutenberg corpus. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, pp. 42–47 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chowdhury, G.G.: Natural language processing. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 37(1), 51–89 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Devi, S.A., Kumar, S.S.: A hybrid document features extraction with clustering based classification framework on large document sets. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appli. (IJACSA) 11(7) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eichstaedt, J.C., et al.: Closed-and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations. Psychol. Methods 26(4), 398 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart, M.: Project Gutenberg literary archive foundation (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jalal, A.A., Ali, B.H.: Text documents clustering using data mining techniques. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (2088–8708) 11(1) 664–670 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jivani, A.G., et al.: A comparative study of stemming algorithms. Int. J. Comp. Tech. Appl 2(6), 1930–1938 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kannan, G., Nagarajan, R.: Text document clustering using statistical integrated graph based sentence sensitivity ranking algorithm. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1070, p. 012069. IOP Publishing (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kent, A., Williams, J.G.: Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology: Volume 27-Supplement 12: Artificial Intelligence and ADA to Systems Integration: Concepts: Methods, and Tools. CRC Press (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lakshmi, R., Baskar, S.: DIC-DOC-K-means: dissimilarity-based initial centroid selection for document clustering using K-means for improving the effectiveness of text document clustering. J. Inf. Sci. 45(6), 818–832 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lebert, M.: Le Projet Gutenberg (1971–2008). Project Gutenberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, Y.S., Jiang, J.Y., Lee, S.J.: A similarity measure for text classification and clustering. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26(7), 1575–1590 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lovins, J.B.: Development of a stemming algorithm. Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguistics 11(1–2), 22–31 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luhn, H.P.: A statistical approach to mechanized encoding and searching of literary information. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1(4), 309–317 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Oghbaie, M., Mohammadi Zanjireh, M.: Pairwise document similarity measure based on present term set. J. Big Data 5(1), 1–23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0163-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Schapire, R.E.: The strength of weak learnability. Mach. Learn. 5, 197–227 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Selivanova, I., Kosyakov, D., Dubovitskii, D., Guskov, A.: Expert, journal, and automatic classification of full texts and annotations of scientific articles. Autom. Docum. Math. Lingu. 55(4), 178–189 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, K., Thrasher, C., Viegas, E., Li, X., Hsu, B.j.P.: An overview of microsoft web n-gram corpus and applications. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Demonstration Session, pp. 45–48 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wanigasooriya, A., Silva, W.P.D.: Automated text classification of library books into the dewey decimal classification (ddc) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Webster, J.J., Kit, C.: Tokenization as the initial phase in NLP. In: COLING 1992 Volume 4: The 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yao, L., Mao, C., Luo, Y.: Graph convolutional networks for text classification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 7370–7377 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Machine Learning, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja, 40-287, Katowice, Poland

    Barbara Probierz, Jan Kozak & Anita Hrabia

Authors
  1. Barbara Probierz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Kozak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anita Hrabia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Probierz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Ngoc Thanh Nguyen

  2. Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Tien Khoa Tran

  3. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

    Ualsher Tukayev

  4. National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Tzung-Pei Hong

  5. Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Bogdan Trawiński

  6. University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

    Edward Szczerbicki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Probierz, B., Kozak, J., Hrabia, A. (2022). A Comparative Study of Classification and Clustering Methods from Text of Books. In: Nguyen, N.T., Tran, T.K., Tukayev, U., Hong, TP., Trawiński, B., Szczerbicki, E. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21967-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21967-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21966-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21967-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation