Skip to main content

Impact of PGM Training on Reaction Time and Sense of Agency

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Multimedia (ICSM 2022)

Abstract

Sense of Agency (SoA) is the mechanism responsible for the feeling of control own actions. Given the nature of Sense of Agency, changes and disorders can occur to the detriment of individual health with disabling consequences. Pneumatic Gel Muscles (PGMs) are a type of soft actuator that, due to their design and construction, can operate with low pressures, removing the necessity of heavy compressors to actuate them, which makes PGMs ideal for wearable purposes. PGMs have proved to be helpful in imparting dexterity training tasks, and also, the soft properties of PGM allow a more natural and less restricted training. This paper presents the design, implementation, and testing of a training system based on Pneumatic Gel Muscles to speed up the user’s Reaction Time in a Simple Reaction Time (RT) task, using a LED as a visual stimulus. Four different modes of PGM feedback training were tested for two participant groups that followed different training sequences. Fast PGM training was the training type that demonstrated the best improvement (defining improving as a speeding up in the RT measurement value), with an improvement of 20.6 ms for Group 1 and an overall improvement of 8.16 ms for all the data, which is very similar to improvement times achieved using other feedback type training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/TTP223-BA6_C80757.pdf.

References

  1. Bergström, J., Knibbe, J., Pohl, H., Hornbæk, K.: Sense of agency and user experience: is there a link? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29(4), 1–22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3490493. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3490493

  2. Braun, N., et al.: The senses of agency and ownership: a review. Front. Psychol. 9(APR), 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das, S., Kurita, Y.: ForceArm: a wearable Pneumatic Gel Muscle (PGM)-based assistive suit for the upper limb. IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics 2(2), 269–281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2020.2990436. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9079448/

  4. Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., Brown, V.J.: Reaction time deficits and Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22(6), 865–881 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00014-1. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149763498000141

  5. Goto, T., Das, S., Wolf, K., Lopes, P., Kurita, Y., Kunze, K.: Accelerating skill acquisition of two-handed drumming using pneumatic artificial muscles. In: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference, pp. 1–9. ACM, New York, March 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384657.3384780. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3384657.3384780

  6. Grünbaum, T., Christensen, M.S.: Measures of agency. Neurosci. Conscious. 2020(1), 406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa019. https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/doi/10.1093/nc/niaa019/5890345

  7. Haggard, P.: Sense of agency in the human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18(4), 196–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.14. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn.2017.14

  8. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, Advances in Psychology, North-Holland, vol. 52, pp. 139–183 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166411508623869

  9. Jeannerod, M.: The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behav. Brain Res. 142(1–2), 1–15 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00384-4. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432802003844

  10. Jordan, N., Sagar, H.J., Cooper, J.A.: Cognitive components of reaction time in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 55(8), 658–664 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.55.8.658. https://jnnp.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/jnnp.55.8.658

  11. Kasahara, S., Nishida, J., Lopes, P.: Preemptive action: accelerating human reaction using electrical muscle stimulation without compromising agency. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2019, pp. 1–15. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300873

  12. Kasahara, S., Takada, K., Nishida, J., Shibata, K., Shimojo, S., Lopes, P.: Preserving agency during electrical muscle stimulation training speeds up reaction time directly after removing EMS. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–9. ACM, New York, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445147. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445147

  13. Kida, N., Oda, S., Matsumura, M.: Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/NoGo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time. Cogn. Brain Res. 22(2), 257–264 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.003. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0926641004002459

  14. Krugwasser, A.R., Stern, Y., Faivre, N., Harel, E.V., Salomon, R.: Impaired sense of agency and associated confidence in psychosis. Schizophrenia 8(1), 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00212-4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41537-022-00212-4

  15. Limerick, H., Coyle, D., Moore, J.W.: The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: a review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8(AUG), 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643. https://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643/abstract

  16. Moore, J.W.: What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Front. Psychol. 7(AUG), 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272. https://journal.frontiersin.org/Article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272/abstract

  17. Ogawa, K., Thakur, C., Ikeda, T., Tsuji, T., Kurita, Y.: Development of a pneumatic artificial muscle driven by low pressure and its application to the unplugged powered suit. Adv. Robot. 31(21), 1135–1143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1392345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Richard, G., Pietrzak, T., Argelaguet, F., Lécuyer, A., Casiez, G.: Studying the role of haptic feedback on virtual embodiment in a drawing task. Front. Virtual Real. 1(January) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.573167

  19. Sakoda, W., Tsuji, T., Kurita, Y.: VR training system of step timing for baseball batter using force stimulus. In: Kajimoto, H., Lee, D., Kim, S.-Y., Konyo, M., Kyung, K.-U. (eds.) AsiaHaptics 2018. LNEE, vol. 535, pp. 321–326. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3194-7_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Synofzik, M., Thier, P., Leube, D.T., Schlotterbeck, P., Lindner, A.: Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Brain 133(1), 262–271 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tajima, D., Nishida, J., Lopes, P., Kasahara, S.: Whose Touch is This?: Understanding the agency trade-off between user-driven touch vs. computer-driven touch. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29(3), 1–27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3489608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tapal, A., Oren, E., Dar, R., Eitam, B.: The sense of agency scale: a measure of consciously perceived control over one’s mind, body, and the immediate environment. Front. Psychol. 8(SEP), 1–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01552. https://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01552/full

  23. Woods, D.L., Wyma, J.M., Yund, E.W., Herron, T.J., Reed, B.: Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9(MAR), 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131. https://www.frontiersin.org/Human_Neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131/abstract

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Kurita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Calderon-Sastre, E., Das, S., Kurita, Y. (2022). Impact of PGM Training on Reaction Time and Sense of Agency. In: Berretti, S., Su, GM. (eds) Smart Multimedia. ICSM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13497. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22061-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22061-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22060-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22061-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics