Skip to main content

Strategic Alignment of Knowledge Management Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (TECH-EDU 2022)

Abstract

Managing company knowledge and using it effectively is more than ever a strong competitive advantage in the business world. The scientific area of knowledge management and knowledge management systems have been intensively studied in the last years; however, we still see the unstructured implementation of knowledge management systems in organizations, the misalignment of knowledge management systems from the business model and the frustration non-use, lack of systems integration and/ or non-return on investment made either in technology or spent on heavy implementation processes. The state-of-the-art conducted during this study, showed that most knowledge management systems alignment models in the business context have a strong focus on the organizational dimension, e.g., culture, organizational processes, organizational structure, and leadership, having been identified only three models that also cover, simultaneous, the technological and strategic dimension. Our final objective in this study is, following the research survey methodology, to develop a proposed framework for the strategic alignment of knowledge management systems that can support company managers in their decision-making, and to contribute to the development of scientific knowledge in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ravishankar, M.N., Pan, S.L., Leidner, D.E.: Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: a subculture-based multilevel analysis. Inform. Syst. Res. 22(1), 39–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.: Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 7 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duffy, J.: The tools and technologies needed for knowledge management. Inf. Manage. 35(1), 64 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grover, V., Davenport, T.H.: General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 18, 5–21 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25(1), 107 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davenport, T.H., Laurence, P.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, H.A., McKeen, J.D.: Developments in practice XII: knowledge-enabling business processes. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13(1), 4 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammadi, K., Khanlari, A., Sohrabi, B.: Organizational readiness assessment for knowledge management. Int. J. Knowl. Manage. 5(1), 29–45 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frost, A.: A synthesis of knowledge management failure factors. Recuperado el 22, 1–22 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Figueira, M.: O Valor do e-Learning. Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação, Porto (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wiig, K.M.: What future knowledge management users may expect. J. Knowl. Manage. 3(2), 155–166 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279910275611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernhardsdóttir, Á.E.: Information Management. In: Crisis-Related Decision-Making and the Influence of Culture on the Behavior of Decision Makers, pp. 95–109. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20714-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Broadbent, M.: The phenomenon of knowledge management: what does it mean to the information profession? Inf. Outlook 2(5), 23–37 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Long Range Plann. 29(4), 592 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuchi, H., Nonaka, I.: Criação e dialética do conhecimento. In: Gestão do conhecimento, vol. 319. Bookman, Porto Alegre (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Offsey, S.: Knowledge management: linking people to knowledge for bottom line results. J. Knowl. Manage. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Pearson Educación (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martins, P.P., Sell, D., Rotta, M.J.R., Ortega, A.R.: Aplicação da metodologia CommonKADS na implementação de projetos de e-gov na perspectiva de uma empresa de software. Navus: Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia 8(2), 87–100 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Werneck, V.M., et al.: Uma avaliação da metodologia mas-commonKADS. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Software Engineering for Agent-oriented Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schreiber, A.Th,, et al.: Knowledge Engineering and Management: the CommonKADS Methodology. MIT press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Giraldo, J., Fernando, L., Quintero, D.M.M.: Aplicación de la metodología commonKADS en la gestión del conocimiento (Application of the methodology commonKADS in knowledge management). Revista CEA 1(2), 99–108 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dias, M.M., dos Santos Pacheco, R.C.: Uma visão geral de metodologias para desenvolvimento de sistemas baseados em conhecimento. Revista de Ciência da Informação 10(5), 03 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: (EBSE 2007-001). Keele University and Durham University Joint Report (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Herrera, R.J.G., Martin-Bautista, M.J.: A novel process-based KMS success framework empowered by ontology learning technology. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 45, 295–312 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reza Mehregan, M., Jamporazmey, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Kazemi, A.: An integrated approach of critical success factors (CSFs) and grey relational analysis for ranking KM systems. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 41, 402–409 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, S.-S., Chuang, Y.-W., Chen, P.-Y.: Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of KMS quality, KMS self-efficacy, and organizational climate. Knowl.-Based Syst. 31, 106–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, A.M., Lederer, A.L.: CEO/CIO mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and the contribution of IS to the organization. Inform. Manage. 47(3), 138–149 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banker, R.D., Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., Luftman, J.: CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Q. 35, 487–504 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Baloh, P., Desouza, K.C., Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems: a design science perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(5), 948–966 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Iskandar, K., Jambak, M.I., Kosala, R., Prabowo, H.: Current issue on knowledge management system for future research: a systematic literature review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 116, 68–80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-C.: Determinants of firms’ knowledge management system implementation: An empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 829–842 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Özlen, A.: Enablers of successful knowledge sharing behavior: KMS, environment and motivation. Eur. J. Econ. Stud. 6(2), 115–123 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, W.-T., Lai, Y.-J.: Examining the adoption of KMS in organizations from an integrated perspective of technology, individual, and organization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 55–67 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, O.-K., Choi, B., Lee, H.: How do knowledge management resources and capabilities pay off in short term and long term? Inform. Manage. 57(2), 103166 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nyame-Asiamah, F., Patel, N.V.: Informing knowledge management systems design and evaluation with the theory of deferred action. Int. J. Technol., Knowl. Soc. 6(2), 191–210 (2010). https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v06i02/56076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson, A.M., Lederer, A.L.: IS strategy and IS contribution: CEO and CIO perspectives. Inf. Syst. Manag. 30(4), 306–318 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Salimi, E., VahdatZad, V., Abdi, F.: Key dimensions to Deploy a knowledge management system in an Iranian firm, a case study. Procedia Technol. 1, 268–274 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuo, R.-Z., Lee, G.-G.: Knowledge management system adoption: exploring the effects of empowering leadership, task-technology fit and compatibility. Behav. Inform. Technol. 30(1), 113–129 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pradana, S.I., Kurniawati, A., Ambarsari, N.: Knowledge management system implementation readiness measurement in PDII LIPI based on people and organizational structure factors. Procedia Manuf. 4, 216–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sha, X., Chang, K.T.-T., Zhang, C., Zhang, C.: Knowledge popularity in a heterogeneous network: Exploiting the contextual effects of document popularity in knowledge management systems. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 64(9), 1842–1851 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brown, S.A., Dennis, A.R., Burley, D., Arling, P.: Knowledge sharing and knowledge management system avoidance: the role of knowledge type and the social network in bypassing an organizational knowledge management system: Knowledge Sharing and KMS Avoidance. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 64(10), 2013–2023 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Martinsons, M.G., Davison, R.M., Huang, Q.: Strategic knowledge management failures in small professional service firms in China. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 37(4), 327–338 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chau, D.C.K., Ngai, E.W.T., Gerow, J.E., Thatcher, J.B.: The effects of business-IT strategic alignment and IT governance on firm performance: a moderated polynomial regression analysis. MIS Q. 44(4), 1679–1703 (2020). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/12165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ping Tserng, H., Lee, M.-H., Hsieh, S.-H., Liu, H.-L.: The measurement factor of employee participation for Knowledge Management System in engineering consulting firms. J. Civil Eng. Manage. 22(2), 154–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Moreno, V., Cavazotte, F.: Using information systems to leverage knowledge management processes: the role of work context, job characteristics and task-technology fit. Procedia Comput. Sci. 55, 360–369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li, J., Liu, M., Liu, X.: Why do employees resist knowledge management systems? an empirical study from the status quo bias and inertia perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 189–200 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kulkarni, U.R., Ravindran, S., Freeze, R.: A knowledge management success model: Theoretical development and empirical validation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23(3), 309–347 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Khaiata, M., Zualkernan, I.A.: A simple instrument to measure IT-business alignment maturity. Inf. Syst. Manag. 26(2), 138–152 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chalmeta, R., Grangel, R.: Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(5), 742–755 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tounkara, T., Isckia, T., Ermine, J.-L.: From strategy to knowledge management plan: how to create strategic alignment. In: ICICKM ‘2009 (6th International Conference on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management), Montréal, Canada (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pinsonneault, A., Kraemer, K.: Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 75–105 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta do Céu Morais Cláudio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

do Céu Morais Cláudio, M., Santos, A. (2022). Strategic Alignment of Knowledge Management Systems. In: Reis, A., Barroso, J., Martins, P., Jimoyiannis, A., Huang, R.YM., Henriques, R. (eds) Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. TECH-EDU 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1720. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22917-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22918-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics