Skip to main content

A Review of Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Methods for Serious Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications (OL2A 2022)

Abstract

Rehabilitation games can be a novel and effective approach to mental and physical rehabilitation. Since patient’s abilities differ, these types of games depend on a variety of levels of difficulty. Furthermore, it is prudent to make continuous adjustments to the difficulty in order to prevent overburdening the patient, whether on emotional or physical level. For this purpose Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment (DDA) can be a very interesting solution, as it allows for the dynamic adaptation of the game based on observed performance and on physiological data of the player. DDA has been used in games for many years as it allows tuning the game to match the player’s ideal flow, keeping high levels of motivation and challenge. This paper reviews several DDA approaches used in rehabilitation and entertainment games. We concluded that many studies use Reinforcement Learning (RL) because it requires no pre-training and can adapt the game in real time without prior knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andrade, K.d.O., Fernandes, G., Caurin, G.A., Siqueira, A.A., Romero, R.A., Pereira, R.d.L.: Dynamic player modelling in serious games applied to rehabilitation robotics. In: 2014 Joint Conference on Robotics: SBR-LARS Robotics Symposium and Robocontrol, pp. 211–216, October 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBR.LARS.Robocontrol.2014.41

  2. Blom, P.M., Bakkes, S., Spronck, P.: Modeling and adjusting in-game difficulty based on facial expression analysis. Entertain. Comput. 31, 100307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100307. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875952119300448

  3. Bontchev, B.: Adaptation in affective video games: a literature review. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 16, 3–34 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2016-0032

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bălan, O., Moise, G., Moldoveanu, A., Leordeanu, M., Moldoveanu, F.: An Investigation of various machine and deep learning techniques applied in automatic fear level detection and acrophobia virtual therapy. Sensors 20(2), 496 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020496. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/2/496

  5. Bălan, O., Moldoveanu, A., Leordeanu, M.: A machine learning approach to automatic phobia therapy with virtual reality. In: Opris, I., A. Lebedev, M., F. Casanova, M. (eds.) Modern Approaches to Augmentation of Brain Function. CCN, pp. 607–636. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54564-2_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chanel, G., Lopes, P.: User evaluation of affective dynamic difficulty adjustment based on physiological deep learning. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12196, pp. 3–23. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50353-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chanel, G., Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., Pun, T.: Emotion assessment from physiological signals for adaptation of game difficulty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 41(6), 1052–1063 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2116000. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans

  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal experience, January 1990

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gabana, D., Tokarchuk, L., Hannon, E., Gunes, H.: Effects of valence and arousal on working memory performance in virtual reality gaming. In: 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), pp. 36–41, October 2017. ISSN: 2156-8111. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2017.8273576

  10. Hocine, N., Gouaïch, A., Cerri, S.A.: Dynamic difficulty adaptation in serious games for motor rehabilitation. In: Göbel, S., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) GameDays 2014. LNCS, vol. 8395, pp. 115–128. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05972-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hocine, N., Gouaïch, A., Di Loreto, I., Joab, M.: Motivation based difficulty adaptation for therapeutic games. In: 2011 IEEE 1st International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) (2011). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6165459/

  12. Huber, T., Mertes, S., Rangelova, S., Flutura, S., André, E.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment in virtual reality exergames through experience-driven procedural content generation, August 2021. arXiv:2108.08762 [cs]

  13. Khalifa, A., Bontrager, P., Earle, S., Togelius, J.: PCGRL: procedural content generation via reinforcement learning, August 2020. arXiv:2001.09212 [cs, stat]

  14. Kuriakose, S., Lahiri, U.: Design of a physiology-sensitive VR-based social communication platform for children with autism. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25(8), 1180–1191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2613879. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

  15. Laud, A.D.: Theory and application of reward shaping in reinforcement learning. Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (2004). aAI3130966

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, Y.H., Kweon, O.Y., Kim, H., Yoo, J.H., Han, S.G., Oh, J.H.: Recent advances in organic sensors for health self-monitoring systems. J. Mat. Chem. C 6(32), 8569–8612 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC02230E. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/tc/c8tc02230e

  17. Liu, C., Agrawal, P., Sarkar, N., Chen, S.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment in computer games through real-time anxiety-based affective feedback. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 25(6), 506–529 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310902963944. Taylor &Francis_eprint

  18. Lopes, R.: An award system for gamification in higher education. In: Conference: 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, pp. 5563–5573, January 2014

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes, R.P., et al.: Digital technologies for innovative mental health rehabilitation. Electronics 10(18), 2260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10182260, https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/18/2260

  20. Materla, T., Cudney, E.A., Antony, J.: The application of Kano model in the healthcare industry: a systematic literature review. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 30(5–6), 660–681 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1328980. Routledge_eprint

  21. Paraschos, P.D., Koulouriotis, D.E.: Game difficulty adaptation and experience personalization: a literature review. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 1–22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2020008

  22. Park, S.y., Sim, H., Lee, W.: Dynamic game difficulty control by using EEG-based emotion recognition. Int. J. Control Autom. (2014). https://doi.org/10.14257/IJCA.2014.7.3.26

  23. Pezzera, M., Borghese, N.A.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment in exer-games for rehabilitation: a mixed approach. In: 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–7, August 2020. ISSN: 2573-3060. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH49190.2020.9201871

  24. Pinto, J.F., Carvalho, H.R., Chambel, G.R.R., Ramiro, J., Goncalves, A.: Adaptive gameplay and difficulty adjustment in a gamified upper-limb rehabilitation. In: 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–8, May 2018. ISSN: 2573-3060. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH.2018.8401363

  25. Qian, H., Yu, Y.: Derivative-free reinforcement learning: a review. Front. Comput. Sci. 15(6), 156336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-0241-4. arXiv: 2102.05710

  26. Rani, P., Liu, C., Sarkar, N., Vanman, E.: An empirical study of machine learning techniques for affect recognition in human-robot interaction. Pattern Anal. Appl. 9(1), 58–69 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-006-0025-y. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10044-006-0025-y

  27. Rello, L., Bayarri, C., Gorriz, A.: What is wrong with this word? Dyseggxia: a game for children with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, October 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384962

  28. Rodrigues, A.S.F., Lopes, J.C., Lopes, R.P.: Classification of facial expressions under partial occlusion for VR games. In: Pereira, A.I., et al. (eds.) OL2A 2022, CCIS 1754, xx–yy (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ávila-Sansores, S., Orihuela-Espina, F., Enrique-Sucar, L.: Patient tailored virtual rehabilitation. In: Pons, J.L., Torricelli, D., Pajaro, M. (eds.) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation. BB, vol. 1, pp. 879–883. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Sekhavat, Y.A.: MPRL: multiple-periodic reinforcement learning for difficulty adjustment in rehabilitation games. In: 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–7, April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH.2017.7939260

  31. Sepulveda, G.K., Besoain, F., Barriga, N.A.: Exploring dynamic difficulty adjustment in videogames. In: 2019 IEEE CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), pp. 1–6, November 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHILECON47746.2019.8988068

  32. Smeddinck, J., Siegel, S., Herrlich, M.: Adaptive difficulty in exergames for Parkinson’s disease patients. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2013, GI 2013, pp. 141–148. Canadian Information Processing Society, Canada, May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sprague, N., Ballard, D.: Multiple-goal reinforcement learning with modular Sarsa(0). In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Jul 2003

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stein, A., Yotam, Y., Puzis, R., Shani, G., Taieb-Maimon, M.: EEG-triggered dynamic difficulty adjustment for multiplayer games. Entertain. Comput. 25, 14–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.11.003. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875952117301325

  35. Subhash, S., Cudney, E.A.: Gamified learning in higher education: a systematic review of the literature. Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 192–206 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218302541

  36. Sykes, J., Brown, S.: Affective gaming: measuring emotion through the gamepad. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2003, pp. 732–733. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, April 2003. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765957

  37. Tan, C.H., Tan, K.C., Tay, A.: Dynamic game difficulty scaling using adaptive behavior-based AI. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 3(4), 289–301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2011.2158434. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games

  38. Tironi, A., Mainetti, R., Pezzera, M., Borghese, N.A.: An empathic virtual caregiver for assistance in exer-game-based rehabilitation therapies. In: 2019 IEEE 7th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–6, August 2019. ISSN: 2573-3060. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH.2019.8882477

  39. Zohaib, M.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment (DDA) in computer games: a review. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2018, e5681652 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5681652. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2018/5681652/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Regional Operational Program North 2020, within the scope of Project GreenHealth - Digital strategies in biological assets to improve well-being and promote green health, Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000042.

This work has been supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UIDB/05757/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Pedro Lopes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lopes, J.C., Lopes, R.P. (2022). A Review of Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Methods for Serious Games. In: Pereira, A.I., Košir, A., Fernandes, F.P., Pacheco, M.F., Teixeira, J.P., Lopes, R.P. (eds) Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications. OL2A 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1754. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23236-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23236-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23235-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23236-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics