Skip to main content

Towards a Secure Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing (ESOCC 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1617))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Machine learning techniques are used in numerous applications to identify complex patterns and relationships in data. However, data of a single actor is often insufficient, as large amounts of data are required to train powerful machine learning models. One approach to tackle this problem is the federated training of models by multiple cooperating entities. However, the cooperation raises security and privacy concerns, especially if competitors are involved that do not want to share business critical training data with each other. We present a secure, privacy preserving, decentralized P2P Federated Learning framework to address these issues. The framework eliminates the need to establish a central trusted server for model training, which often represents a communication bottleneck or single point of failure. Various steps of data preprocessing, as well as the aggregation of individual models are carried out by means of Secure Multi-Party Computation to protect the data of training participants. We describe our experiments to demonstrate the basic feasibility of the working prototype and highlight open technical and methodological issues that we aim to address in the future.

Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Project name: KIWI, RefNr: 16KIS1142K.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/microsoft/APSI.

  2. 2.

    https://www.kaggle.com/kartik2112/fraud-detection.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/namebrandon/Sparkov_Data_Generation.

References

  1. Abadi, M., et al.: Deep learning with differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 308–318 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aïvodji, U., Gambs, S., Ther, T.: GAMIN: an adversarial approach to black-box model inversion. CoRR abs/1909.11835 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellet, A., Guerraoui, R., Taziki, M., Tommasi, M.: Personalized and private peer-to-peer machine learning. In: AISTATS, vol. 84, pp. 473–481. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonawitz, K., et al., V.I.: Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In: Thuraisingham, B.M., et al., D.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS, pp. 1175–1191. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chou, L., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., Shrivastava, A.: Efficient and less centralized federated learning. In: Oliver, N., Pérez-Cruz, F., Kramer, S., Read, J., Lozano, J.A. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2021. LNCS, vol. 12975, pp. 772–787. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86486-6_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cong, K., et al.: Labeled psi from homomorphic encryption with reduced computation and communication. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2021/1116 (2021). https://ia.cr/2021/1116

  7. Hard, A., et al.: Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. CoRR abs/1811.03604 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, Z., Zhang, T., Lee, R.B.: Model inversion attacks against collaborative inference. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 148–162. ACSAC 2019, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359789.3359824

  9. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H.B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., et al.: Advances and open problems in federated learning. CoRR abs/1912.04977 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04977

  10. Konečný, J., McMahan, H.B., Yu, F.X., Richtarik, P., Suresh, A.T., Bacon, D.: Federated learning: strategies for improving communication efficiency. In: NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melis, L., Song, C., Cristofaro, E.D., Shmatikov, V.: Inference attacks against collaborative learning. CoRR abs/1805.04049 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04049

  12. Patarasuk, P., Yuan, X.: Bandwidth optimal all-reduce algorithms for clusters of workstations. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 69(2), 117–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2008.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paverd, A.J., Martin, A.C.: Modelling and automatically analysing privacy properties for honest-but-curious adversaries (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reddi, S.J., et al.: Adaptive federated optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rigaki, M., Garcia, S.: A survey of privacy attacks in machine learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roy, A.G., Siddiqui, S., Pölsterl, S., Navab, N., Wachinger, C.: BrainTorrent: a peer-to-peer environment for decentralized federated learning. CoRR abs/1905.06731 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salem, A., Bhattacharya, A., Backes, M., Fritz, M., Zhang, Y.: Updates-leak: data set inference and reconstruction attacks in online learning. In: 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20), pp. 1291–1308. USENIX Association (2020), https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/salem

  18. Shayan, M., Fung, C., Yoon, C.J.M., Beschastnikh, I.: Biscotti: a ledger for private and secure peer-to-peer machine learning. CoRR abs/1811.09904 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09904

  19. Wink, T., Nochta, Z.: An approach for peer-to-peer federated learning. In: Proceedings of 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wittkopp, T., Acker, A.: Decentralized federated learning preserves model and data privacy. In: Hacid, H., et al. (eds.) ICSOC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12632, pp. 176–187. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76352-7_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, H., Canny, J.F.: Sparse allreduce: efficient scalable communication for power-law data. CoRR abs/1312.3020 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Piotrowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Piotrowski, T., Nochta, Z. (2022). Towards a Secure Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning Framework. In: Zirpins, C., et al. Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing. ESOCC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1617. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23298-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23298-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23297-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23298-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics