Skip to main content

Federated Learning for Lung Sound Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (RTIP2R 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1704))

Abstract

Despite the general success of employing artificial intelligence (AI) to help radiologists perform computer-aided patient diagnosis, creating good models with tiny datasets at different sites is still tough. Medical image analysis is crucial for the quick and precise detection of lung disease and helps clinicians treat patients effectively while averting more fatalities. This is why real-time medical data management is becoming essential in the healthcare industry, especially for systems that monitor patients from a distance. To overcome this challenge, we propose a different approach by utilizing a relatively new learning framework. Individual sites may jointly train a global model using this approach, referred to as federated learning. Without explicitly sharing datasets, federated learning combines training results from various sites to produce a global model. This makes sure that patient confidentiality is upheld across all sites. Additionally, the additional supervision gained from partner sites’ results enhances the global model’s overall detection capabilities. This study’s primary goal is to determine how the federated learning (FL) approach may offer a machine learning average model that is robust, accurate, and unbiased in detecting lung disorders. For this aim, we analyze 325 Lung Sound audio recordings collected from https://data.mendeley.com/ and, transform this audio signal into Melspectrograms. Once the labeling and preprocessing steps were carried out, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)(FederatedNet) model was used to classify the respiratory sounds into healthy and unhealthy. We achieved the result of almost 88% validation accuracy. Furthermore, this paper discusses the application of FL and its overview. Lastly, we discuss the main challenges to federated learning adoption and potential future benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill, P.: The rationale for learning communities and learning community models (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Min, X., Bin, Yu., Wang, F.: Predictive modeling of the hospital readmission risk from patients’ claims data using machine learning: a case study on COPD. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–10 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez, M.V., et al.: Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 381(20), 1909–1917 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gostin, L.O.: National health information privacy: regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. JAMA 285(23), 3015–3021 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mamun, M., et al.: Heart failure survival prediction using machine learning algorithm: am I safe from heart failure? In: 2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT). IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mamun, M., et al.: Lung cancer prediction model using ensemble learning techniques and a systematic review analysis. In: 2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT). IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. https://www.cdc.gov/copd/data.html

  9. Bakas, S., et al.: Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci. Data 4(1), 1–13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Antunes, R.S., et al.: Federated learning for healthcare: systematic review and architecture proposal. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 13(4), 1–23 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, W., et al.: Privacy-preserving federated brain tumour segmentation. In: Suk, H.-I., Liu, M., Yan, P., Lian, C. (eds.) MLMI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11861, pp. 133–141. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32692-0_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Konečný, J., et al.: Federated learning: strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 (2016)

  13. Li, X., et al.: Diagnosis of thyroid cancer using deep convolutional neural network models applied to sonographic images: a retrospective, multicohort, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 20(2), 193–201 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng, D., et al.: Federated learning: a collaborative effort to achieve better medical imaging models for individual sites that have small labelled datasets. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 11(2), 852 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J., et al.: Privacy-preserving patient similarity learning in a federated environment: development and analysis. JMIR Med. Inform. 6(2), e7744 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, Y., et al.: Federated tensor factorization for computational phenotyping. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, D., Dligach, D., Miller, T.: Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning. In: Proceedings of the Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting, vol. 2019. NIH Public Access (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, L., et al.: Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records. J. Biomed. Inform. 99, 103291 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brisimi, T.S., et al.: Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records. Int. J. Med. Inform. 112, 59–67 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dayan, I., et al.: Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 27(10), 1735–1743 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo, J.H., et al.: Personalized federated learning with clustering: non-IID heart rate variability data application. In: 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pfitzner, B., Steckhan, N., Arnrich, B.: Federated learning in a medical context: a systematic literature review. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 21(2), 1–31 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fraiwan, M., et al.: A dataset of lung sounds recorded from the chest wall using an electronic stethoscope. Data Brief 35, 106913 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afia Farjana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Farjana, A., Makkar, A. (2023). Federated Learning for Lung Sound Analysis. In: Santosh, K., Goyal, A., Aouada, D., Makkar, A., Chiang, YY., Singh, S.K. (eds) Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. RTIP2R 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1704. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23599-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23599-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23598-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23599-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics