Skip to main content

Moveable Älıpbi: The Montessori Method for Robot-Assisted Alphabet Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2022)

Abstract

The Montessori method is well-known for its child-centered and hands-on learning approach for early literacy development. This study is the first to apply the Montessori method in robot-assisted language learning (RALL). We developed an alphabet learning system that consists of a Moveable alphabet, a tablet, and a social robot. We conducted a between-subjects experiment with 89 Kazakh children aged 6–11 that learned the Kazakh Latin alphabet either with a Montessori-human (MH) or a Montessori-robot (MR) teacher. We examined the effects of the learning method on children’s learning gains and emotional outcomes across these two conditions. Our results suggest that in the Montessori learning environment the MH teacher was significantly more effective in providing early literacy support than the MR teacher. The emotional states were mixed between grades, but the children in the MR condition felt happier than those in the MH condition in Grades 1 (ages 6–7) and 4 (ages 10–11). This exploratory study suggests testing the method’s effectiveness in long-term child-robot interactions, with varied learning tasks over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee, S., Lee, S., et al.: On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL 23, 25–58 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hood, D., Lemaignan, S., Dillenbourg, P.: The cowriter project: Teaching a robot how to write. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, pp. 269–269, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon, G., Breazeal, C.: Bayesian active learning-based robot tutor for children’s word-reading skills. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2015, pp. 1343–1349. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., van der Ven, S.H.G., Leseman, P.P.M.: Social robots for language learning: A review. Rev. Educ. Res. 89, 259–295 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Movellan, J.R., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M., Rodriguez, A.: Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In: 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 307–308 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., Ghazisaedy, M.: Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 11, 1450022 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandygulova, A. ., et al.: Cowriting Kazakh: Learning a new script with a robot In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 113–120 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lopata, C., Wallace, N., Finn, K.: Comparison of academic achievement between Montessori and traditional education programs. J. Res. Childhood Educ. 20, 5–13 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hertzberger, H.: Montessori primary school in delft, holland. Harv. Educ. Rev. 39, 58–67 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isaacs, B.: Understanding the Montessori Approach: Early Years Education in Practice (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall, C.R.: Montessori education: a review of the evidence base. NPJ Sci. Learn. 2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murray, A.K.: Public perceptions of Montessori education (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rathunde, K.: A comparison of Montessori and traditional middle schools: Motivation, quality of experience, and social context. Am. J. Educ. 111, 341–371 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Soundy, C.: Portraits of exemplary Montessori practice for all literacy teachers. Early Childhood Educ. J. 31, 127–131 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dohrmann, K., Nishida, T., Gartner, A., Lipsky, D., Grimm, K.: High school outcomes for students in a public Montessori program. J. Res. Childhood Educ. 22, 205–217 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lillard, A., Else-Quest, N.: Evaluating Montessori education. Science (New York) 313, 1893–4 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. İman, E., Danişman, Demircan, Z., Yaya, D.: The effect of the montessori education method on pre-school children’s social competence - behaviour and emotion regulation skills. Early Child Developm. Care 189, 1–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amirova, A., Rakhymbayeva, N., Yadollahi, E., Sandygulova, A., Johal, W.: 10 years of human-nao interaction research: A scoping review. Front. Robot. AI 8, 744526 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Academy, Introducing the moveable alphabet. https://montessoriacademy.com.au/material-spotlight-moveable-alphabet.. (Accessed 09 March 2022)

  20. Ali, M., Behzad, H., Mahoor, M.H.: Affectnet: A database for facial expression, valence, and arousal computing in the wild. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 1, 18–31 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhexenova, Z., et al.: A comparison of social robot to tablet and teacher in a new script learning context. Front. Robot. AI 7 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Westlund, J.K., Dickens, L.R., Jeong, S., Harris, P.L., DeSteno, D., Breazeal, C.: A comparison of children learning new words from robots, tablets, & people (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, H., Park, H.W., Breazeal, C.: Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Comput. Educ. 150, 1–22 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: A review. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat5954 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sandygulova, A., O’Hare, G.M.P.: Age- and gender-based differences in children’s interactions with a gender-matching robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10, 687–700 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheeff, M., Pinto, J., Rahardja, K., Snibbe, S.S., Tow, R.: Experiences with sparky, a social robot (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martínez-Miranda, J., Espinosa, H.P., Espinosa-Curiel, I.E., Avila-George, H., Rodríguez-Jacobo, J.: Age-based differences in preferences and affective reactions towards a robot’s personality during interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 84, 245–257 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The Nazarbayev University Collaborative Research Program grants 091019CRP2107 and OPCRP2022002 provided funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anara Sandygulova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhanatkyzy, A., Telisheva, Z., Amirova, A., Oralbayeva, N., Aimysheva, A., Sandygulova, A. (2022). Moveable Älıpbi: The Montessori Method for Robot-Assisted Alphabet Learning. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics