Skip to main content

“Armed” and Dangerous: How Visual Form Influences Perceptions of Robot Arms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13818))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Existing research on human perception of robot appearance has focused heavily on anthropomorphism and humanoid robots, with less attention paid to visual form attributes and non-humanoid systems. In this paper, we propose robot visual form attribute traits and a beginning sampling of robot arms with which to expand the understanding of robot visual form effects. We conduct an online survey-based within-subjects study to gather ratings of these visual form attributes, as well as standard social attributes, for each arm. Our data collection methods include two-alternative forced choice questions and sets of Likert-type self-reports related to individual visual stimuli. The results from this exploratory study show that even within non-humanoid robots of similar structure, the visual elements have a significant effect on perceptions of robot social characteristics such as warmth, competency, and safety.

R. C. Preston and N. Raghunath—Contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., Al Mahmud, A.: Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(2), 195–204 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernotat, J., Eyssel, F., Sachse, J.: Shape it - the influence of robot body shape on gender perception in robots. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10652. Springer, Cham, pp. 75–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_8

  3. Broadbent, E., et al.: Robots with display screens: a robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PLoS ONE 8(8), 1–9 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter, J., Davis, J.M., Erwin-Stewart, N., Lee, T.R., Bransford, J.D., Vye, N.: Gender representation and humanoid robots designed for domestic use. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(3), 261–265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpinella, C.M., Wyman, A.B., Perez, M.A., Stroessner, S.J.: The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS) development and validation. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 254–262 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CMR Surgical: Versius Surgical Robot System - CMR Surgical. https://cmrsurgical.com/versius

  7. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.E.A.: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Franka Emika GmbH: Franka Emika - The Robotics Company. https://www.franka.de/

  9. Gautam, M., Fagerlund, H., Greicevci, B., Christophe, F., Havula, J., Havula, J.: Collaborative robotics in construction: a test case on screwing gypsum boards on ceiling. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), pp. 88–93 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37(6), 504–528 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, J., Park, T., Hwang, W.: The effects of overall robot shape on the emotions invoked in users and the perceived personalities of robot. Appl. Ergon. 44(3), 459–471 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. KUKA Ag: Industrial Robots: KUKA AG. https://www.kuka.com/en-us/products/robotics-systems/industrial-robots

  13. Lucas, H., Poston, J., Yocum, N., Carlson, Z., Feil-Seifer, D.: Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1071–1076 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., Malle, B.F.: What is human-like?: Decomposing robots’ human-like appearance using the Anthropomorphic roBOT (ABOT) database. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 105–113 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Picelli, A., et al.: Robot-assisted arm training for treating adult patients with distal radius fracture: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 56(4), 444–450 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tay, B., Jung, Y., Park, T.: When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 75–84 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tennent, H., Moore, D., Jung, M., Ju, W.: Good vibrations: how consequential sounds affect perception of robotic arms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 928–935 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R.T.: Preferences and perceptions of robot appearance and embodiment in human-robot interaction trials. In: Proceedings of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 136–143 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Cindy Grimm, Alejandro Velasquez, and Joshua Campbell for providing the Kinova and UR5e robot arms and posing them for photographing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhian C. Preston .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Preston, R.C., Raghunath, N., Sanchez, C.A., Fitter, N.T. (2022). “Armed” and Dangerous: How Visual Form Influences Perceptions of Robot Arms. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics