Abstract
The Build-A-Bot online platform has been developed with the goal to enable active participatory design and broaden the participation in social robot design. The platform is hosted on a webpage to make robot design widely available. Active participatory design is enabled by giving the user the maximum amount of creative freedom in creating their own designs. The platform uses a form of gamification that challenges the user to build robot designs that emulate an experience or agency capability. The overall goal is to create a comprehensive set of robot designs that are related to such an attribute. This data then will allow us to research robot mind perception using Machine Learning and neuroscience methods in the future. This work focuses on the development of the online Build-A-Bot platform and the methodology implemented on the platform.
This research has been sponsored by the University of Denver under the Professional Research Opportunities for Faculty (PROF) opportunity to Drs. Haring, Kim, and Pittman under grant \(\#\) 142101-84994 and by the University of Denver under the Faculty Research Funds (FRF) to Drs. Haring and Pittman under grant \(\#\) 142101-84694.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angular. https://angular.io/
MongoDB: The Developer Data Platform. https://www.mongodb.com
Neo4j Graph Data Platform - The Leader in Graph Databases. https://neo4j.com/
van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Van der Ven, S., Leseman, P.: Social robots for language learning: A review. Rev. Educ. Res. 89(2), 259–295 (2019)
Carpenter, J.: The Quiet Professional: An investigation of US military Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel interactions with everyday field robots. Ph.D. thesis (2013)
Cha, E., Dragan, A.D., Srinivasa, S.S.: Perceived robot capability. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 541–548. IEEE (2015)
Corrigan, L.J., Basedow, C., Kïster, D., Kappas, A., Peters, C., Castellano, G.: Mixing implicit and explicit probes: finding a ground truth for engagement in social human-robot interactions. In: 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 140–141. IEEE (2014)
Dino, F., Zandie, R., Abdollahi, H., Schoeder, S., Mahoor, M.H.: Delivering cognitive behavioral therapy using a conversational social robot. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2089–2095. IEEE (2019)
Figma (2021). https://www.figma.com/ (25 Aug 2021)
Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C.: Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART onference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 258–265 (2006)
Gray, H.M., Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812), 619–619 (2007)
Haring, K.S., Phillips, E., Lazzara, E.H., Ullman, D., Baker, A.L., Keebler, J.R.: Applying the swift trust model to human-robot teaming. In: Trust in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 407–427. Elsevier (2021)
Haring, K.S., Watanabe, K., Velonaki, M., Tossell, C.C., Finomore, V.: FFAB-The form function attribution bias in human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Developm. Syst. 10(4), 843–851 (2018)
Henry, S.L., Abou-Zahra, S., Brewer, J.: The role of accessibility in a universal web. In: Proceedings of the 11th Web for all Conference, pp. 1–4 (2014)
Himichi, T., Nomura, M.: Modulation of empathy in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates altruistic behavior: An fNIRS study. J. Integr. Neurosci. 14(02), 207–222 (2015)
Huang, L., Gillan, D.: An exploration of robot builders’ emotional responses to their tournament robots. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, pp. 2013–2017. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2014)
Huang, L., Varnado, T., Gillan, D.: An exploration of robot builders’ attachment to their lego robots. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 57, pp. 1825–1829. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2013)
Keller, L., John, I.: How can computer science faculties increase the proportion of women in computer science by using robots? In: 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 206–210. IEEE (2019)
Kumar, A.: Integrating with Blender, Maya and Marmoset. In: Beginning PBR Texturing, pp. 165–186. Apress, Berkeley, CA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5899-6_16
Küster, D., Swiderska, A.: Seeing the mind of robots: Harm augments mind perception but benevolent intentions reduce dehumanisation of artificial entities in visual vignettes. Int. J. Psychol. 56(3), 454–465 (2021)
Lochner, D.: Creature Creator (2021). https://github.com/daniellochner/Creature-Creator
Matthews, G., Lin, J., Panganiban, A.R., Long, M.D.: Individual differences in trust in autonomous robots: Implications for transparency. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 50(3), 234–244 (2019)
Muller, M.J.: Participatory design: the third space in HCI. CRC Press (2007)
Norman, D.A.: Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Civitas Books (2004)
Peerdeman, P.: Sound and music in games. Amsterdam: VrijeUniversiteit, pp. 2–3 (2010)
Phillips, E., Ullman, D., de Graaf, M.M., Malle, B.F.: What does a robot look like?: A multi-site examination of user expectations about robot appearance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 61, pp. 1215–1219. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2017)
Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., Malle, B.F.: What is human-like? Decomposing robots’ human-like appearance using the anthropomorphic robot (ABOT) database. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 105–113 (2018)
Plaza, P., et al.: Educational robotics for all: Gender, diversity, and inclusion in steam. In: 2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), pp. 19–24. IEEE (2020)
Ramírez-Duque, A.A., et al.: Collaborative and inclusive process with the autism community: a case study in colombia about social robot design. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(2), 153–167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00627-y
Raposo, D., Santoro, A., Barrett, D., Pascanu, R., Lillicrap, T., Battaglia, P.: Discovering objects and their relations from entangled scene representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05068 (2017)
Ritter, S.M., Ferguson, S.: Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PLoS ONE 12(9), e0182210 (2017)
Robertson, T., Simonsen, J.: Challenges and opportunities in contemporary participatory design. Des. Issues 28(3), 3–9 (2012)
Sampietro, A.: Use and interpretation of emoji in electronic-mediated communication: A survey. Vis. Commun. Q. 27(1), 27–39 (2020)
Schaefer, K.E., Sanders, T.L., Yordon, R.E., Billings, D.R., Hancock, P.A.: Classification of robot form: Factors predicting perceived trustworthiness. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 56, pp. 1548–1552. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2012)
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Tondeur, J.: The technology acceptance model (tam): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 128, 13–35 (2019)
Schramm, L.T., Dufault, D., Young, J.E.: Warning: This robot is not what it seems! exploring expectation discrepancy resulting from robot design. In: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 439–441 (2020)
Senkic, D.: Dynamic simulation in a 3d-environment: A comparison between maya and blender (2010)
Smith, M.B.: 3d character modeling in maya and blender. Undergraduate Honors Theses 120 (2017). https://thekeep.eiu.edu/honors_theses/120
Store, U.A.: Unity multipurpose avatar (2022). https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/3d/characters/uma-2-unity-multipurpose-avatar-35611. (Accessed 16 August 2022)
Technologies U: Unity - Manual: Building your WebGL application. https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/webgl-building.html
Technologies U: Unity Real-Time Development Platform — 3D, 2D VR & AR Engine. https://unity.com/
Thellman, S., de Graaf, M., Ziemke, T.: Mental state attribution to robots: A systematic review of conceptions, methods, and findings. ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact. (2021)
Totten, C.: Game character creation with blender and unity. John Wiley & Sons (2012)
Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2011)
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to our students Abdul Ayad, Mike Blanding, Marley Bogran, Madeline Bohn, William Bohrmann, Gillian Ehman, Josh Ellis, Angel Fernandes, Tanner Francis, Sergio Gonzales, Elizabeth Gutierrez-Gutierrez, Ulises A. Heredia Trinidad, Beatriz Hernandez, Esabella Irby, Henry Jaffray, Izzy Johnson, Braden Kelsey, Yahir Luevano-Estrada, Nicholas Ninos, Sneha Patil, Max Peterson, Yasmin Raz, Hector Armando Rodriguez, Ashley Sanchez, Grace Strasheim, Raghav Thapa, Maisey Toczek, and Ralph Vrooman for their work on DU Build-A-Bot.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Laity, W., Dossett, B., Mamo, R., Pittman, D., Haring, K. (2022). Active Participatory Social Robot Design Using Mind Perception Attributes. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)