Abstract
Many studies have investigated the effect of robot genderedness on the attribution of gender stereotypes to a robot, often with mixed results. This paper aims to overcome some of the limitations of previous research. We adopted a mixed study design with stereotypical trait type (communion vs. agency) or task type (stereotypical female vs. stereotypical male) and robot genderedness (female vs. male vs. neutral) as within-subjects factors, and participant gender (men vs. women) as between-subjects factor. We asked participants to rate 24 robots (8 per category) in terms of their perceived communion, agency, and suitability for stereotypical female and male tasks. The results disclosed that female robots activate paternalistic stereotypes (higher communion than agency, higher suitability for female tasks than male tasks), while male robots do not. Moreover, they reveal that the ambivalence of these stereotypes is stronger in men than in women. Even more interestingly, our analyses showed that neutral robots activate paternalistic stereotypes in men and envious stereotypes (higher agency than communion) in women. This last finding is particularly relevant as it suggests that gender neutrality is not enough to safeguard robots from harmful biases.
This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant number 024.004.031).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Not yet publicly available at the time of publication.
- 2.
The higher masculinity cut-off score being necessary given most of the robots in the original study were perceived as male.
References
Abele, A.E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., Duan, Y.: Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Front. Psychol. 7, 1810 (2016)
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., Bates, D.: Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59(4), 390–412 (2008)
Bernotat, J., Eyssel, F., Sachse, J.: The (fe) male robot: how robot body shape impacts first impressions and trust towards robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(3), 477–489 (2021)
Bryant, D., Borenstein, J., Howard, A.: Why should we gender? The effect of robot gendering and occupational stereotypes on human trust and perceived competency. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 13–21 (2020)
Choi, N., Fuqua, D.R., Newman, J.L.: Exploratory and confirmatory studies of the structure of the bem sex role inventory short form with two divergent samples. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 69(4), 696–705 (2009)
Cuddy, A.J., Fiske, S.T., Glick, P.: The bias map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92(4), 631 (2007)
Cuddy, A.J., Fiske, S.T., Glick, P.: Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: the stereotype content model and the bias map. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 61–149 (2008)
Eyssel, F., Hegel, F.: (s)he’s got the look: gender stereotyping of robots. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42(9), 2213–2230 (2012)
Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Hegel, F., De Ruiter, L.: Activating elicited agent knowledge: how robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 851–857. IEEE (2012)
Fai, A.H.T., Cornelius, P.L.: Approximate f-tests of multiple degree of freedom hypotheses in generalized least squares analyses of unbalanced split-plot experiments. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 54(4), 363–378 (1996)
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., Glick, P.: Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11(2), 77–83 (2007)
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., Glick, P., Xu, J.: A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. In: Social Cognition, pp. 162–214. Routledge (2002)
Hentschel, T., Heilman, M.E., Peus, C.V.: The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: a current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Front. Psychol. 10, 11 (2019)
Parlangeli, O., Bracci, M., Marghigiani, E., Palmitesta, P., Guidi, S.: She’s better at this, he’s better at that. Gender role stereotypes in humanoid robots. In: 33rd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE 2022), pp. 73–82. ACM, New York (2022)
Perugia, G., Guidi, S., Bicchi, M., Parlangeli, O.: The shape of our bias: perceived age and gender in the humanoid robots of the ABOT database. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2022, pp. 110–119. IEEE Press (2022)
Perugia, G., Lisy, D.: Robot’s gendering trouble: a scoping review of gendering humanoid robots and its effects on HRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.01130 (2022)
Perugia, G., Rossi, A., Rossi, S.: Gender revealed: evaluating the genderedness of Furhat’s predefined faces. In: Li, H., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 13086, pp. 36–47. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_4
Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., Malle, B.F.: What is human-like? Decomposing robots’ human-like appearance using the anthropomorphic robot (ABOT) database. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2018, pp. 105–113. ACM, New York (2018)
Rea, D.J., Wang, Y., Young, J.E.: Check your stereotypes at the door: an analysis of gender typecasts in social human-robot interaction. In: ICSR 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9388, pp. 554–563. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_55
Rollero, C., Glick, P., Tartaglia, S.: Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM - Test. Psychomet. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 21(2), 149–159 (2014)
Spiel, K., Haimson, O.L., Lottridge, D.: How to do better with gender on surveys: a guide for HCI researchers. Interactions 26(4), 62–65 (2019)
Stoeber, J.: The social desirability scale-17 (SDS-17): convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 17(3), 222–232 (2001)
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., Epley, N.: Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5(3), 219–232 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guidi, S., Boor, L., van der Bij, L., Foppen, R., Rikmenspoel, O., Perugia, G. (2022). Ambivalent Stereotypes Towards Gendered Robots: The (Im)mutability of Bias Towards Female and Neutral Robots. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)