Skip to main content

MCMARS: Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Algorithm for Recommender Systems of Mobile Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Computing and Intelligent Technology (ICDCIT 2023)

Abstract

A mobile application (app) recommender system needs to support both developers and users. Existing recommender systems in the literature are based on single-criterion analysis, which is insufficient for producing better recommendations. Moreover, recommendations do not reflect the user’s perspectives. To address these issues, in this paper, we present a Multi-Criteria Mobile App Recommender System (MCMARS) that assists developers in improving their apps and recommends the top-performing apps to users. We define the performance score of an app based on four criteria attributes: risk assessment score, functionality score, user rating, and the app’s memory size. We define the risk assessment score for each app using multi-perspective analysis and the functionality score by assigning preference weights to the services of apps in the same category. We evaluate optimal weights of the criteria by integrating the entropy method and the extended Best-Worst method (BWM) using Hesitant-Triangular-Fuzzy information with group-decisions. Finally, the TOPSIS uses these weights to assess the app’s performance. To validate our MCMARS, we prepared a dataset of 124 government-approved COVID-19 Android apps from 80 countries and made it available on GitHub for the research community. Finally, we perform a fine-grained analysis of the app’s performance based on the criteria attributes that help the developers to improve their apps. The experimental results show that two independent attributes, “risk assessment score” and “functionality score”, significantly measure the app’s performance. According to our findings, only 12.5% of the apps in the experimental dataset provide high-performance, high-functionality, and low-risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    URL: https://www.immuniweb.com/.

References

  1. Alazab, M., Shalaginov, A., Mesleh, A., Awajan, A.: Intelligent mobile malware detection using permission requests and API calls. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 107, 509–521 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. FIRST: Cvss v3.0 specification document, first (2015). https://www.first.org/cvss/v3.0/specification-document. Accessed 26 Jan 2021

  3. Gates, C.S., et al.: Generating summary risk scores for mobile applications. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 11(3), 238–251 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gómez, M., Rouvoy, R., Monperrus, M., Seinturier, L.: A recommender system of buggy app checkers for app store moderators. In: 2015 2nd ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, pp. 1–11. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hazrati, N., Ricci, F.: Recommender systems effect on the evolution of users’ choices distribution. Inf. Process. Manage. 59(1), 102766 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, W., Cao, B., Yang, G., Luo, N., Chao, N.: Turn to the internet first? Using online medical behavioral data to forecast COVID-19 epidemic trend. Inf. Process. Manage. 58(3), 102486 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain, P., Sharma, A., Aggarwal, P.K.: Key attributes for a quality mobile application. In: 2020 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), pp. 50–54. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jisha, R., Krishnan, R., Vikraman, V.: Mobile applications recommendation based on user ratings and permissions. In: 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp. 1000–1005. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2018.8554691

  9. Jorgensen, Z., Chen, J., Gates, C.S., Li, N., Proctor, R.W., Yu, T.: Dimensions of risk in mobile applications: a user study. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, pp. 49–60. ACM (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2699026.2699108

  10. Kumar, G., Parimala, N.: A sensitivity analysis on weight sum method MCDM approach for product recommendation. In: Fahrnberger, G., Gopinathan, S., Parida, L. (eds.) ICDCIT 2019. LNCS, vol. 11319, pp. 185–193. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05366-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B., Kong, D., Cen, L., Gong, N.Z., Jin, H., Xiong, H.: Personalized mobile app recommendation: reconciling app functionality and user privacy preference. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 315–324. ACM (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2684822.2685322

  12. Liu, Y., Eckert, C.M., Earl, C.: A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Syst. Appl. 161, 113738 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma, Y., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Huang, G.: A tale of two fashions: an empirical study on the performance of native apps and web apps on android. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 17(5), 990–1003 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng, M., Zeng, G., Sun, Z., Huang, J., Wang, H., Tian, G.: Personalized app recommendation based on app permissions. World Wide Web 21(1), 89–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-017-0456-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rezaei, J.: Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rocha, T., Souto, E., El-Khatib, K.: Functionality-based mobile application recommendation system with security and privacy awareness. Comput. Secur. 97, 101972 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Samanlioglu, F., Taskaya, Y.E., Gulen, U.C., Cokcan, O.: A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS-based group decision-making approach to IT personnel selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(5), 1576–1591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0474-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thapar, S.S., Sarangal, H.: Quantifying reusability of software components using hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP)-metrics approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 88, 105997 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, Y., Zhu, X., Wen, X., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Fuzzy best-worst method and its application in initial water rights allocation. Appl. Soft Comput. 101, 107007 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, H., Xiong, H., Ge, Y., Chen, E.: Mobile app recommendations with security and privacy awareness. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 951–960. ACM (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623705

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Tejaswi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tejaswi, S., Sastry, V.N., Durga Bhavani, S. (2023). MCMARS: Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Algorithm for Recommender Systems of Mobile Applications. In: Molla, A.R., Sharma, G., Kumar, P., Rawat, S. (eds) Distributed Computing and Intelligent Technology. ICDCIT 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24848-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24848-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24847-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24848-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics