Skip to main content

Recommendation Systems for a Group of Users Which Recommend Recent Attention: Using Hybrid Recommendation Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Communication and Intelligent Systems (ICACIS 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1749))

  • 481 Accesses

Abstract

Group recommendation systems, which deliver items to a group of users, have recently received a lot of interest. Several aggregation and model group recommendation techniques were discussed. On the other hand, group recommendation's cold-start issue has received less attention, severely restricting group recommendation in several crucial areas, such as offline suggestions. In this study, we offer a new deep hybrid framework to address the cold start issue with group event recommendations for a user group. Our framework is the basis for RBM and comprises numerous restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM). The first gathers client preferences as well as high-quality latent data. Context information like location and event structure is used to identify late event aspects. Set up a schedule for the event. To fix the cold-start issue, we tested our proposed framework on two real-world datasets, and the results demonstrate that it outperforms Baseline Group recommendation techniques and efficiently addresses the cold-start issue in group events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker, E.C.: Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beel, J., Genzmehr, M., Langer, S., Nürnberger, A., Gipp, B.: A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation (RepSys 2013), pp. 7–14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2532508.2532511

  3. Bernstein, A., et al.: Diversity in News Recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09495 (2020)

  4. Bodó, B.: Selling news to audiences – a qualitative inquiry into the emerging logics of algorithmic news personalization in European quality news media. Digital J. 7(8), 1054–1075 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1624185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burke, R., Sonboli, N., Ordonez-Gauger, A.: Balanced neighborhoods for multi-sided fairness in recommendation. In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 202–214 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castells, P., Hurley, N.J., Vargas, S.: Novelty and diversity in recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender systems handbook, pp. 881–918. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaney, A.J.B., Stewart, B.M., Engelhardt, B.E.: How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2018), pp. 224–232. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240370

  8. Christians, C.: The Media and Moral Literacy. 62p. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christians, C., Glasser, T.L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., White, R.A.: Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dahlberg, L.: Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’. New Med. Soc. 13(6), 855–872 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389569

  11. Dillahunt, T.R., Brooks, C.A., Gulati, S.: Detecting and visualizing filter bubbles in Google and Bing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1851–1856 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dörr, K.N.: Mapping the field of algorithmic journalism. Digital J. 4(6), 700–722 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748

  13. Eskens, S., Helberger, N., Moeller, J.: Challenged by news personalisation: five perspectives on the right to receive information. J. Media Law. 9(2), 259–284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2017.1387353

  14. Rajawat, A.S., Rawat, R., Barhanpurkar, K., Shaw, R.N., Ghosh, A.: Vulnerability analysis at industrial internet of things platform on dark web network using computational intelligence. In: Bansal, J.C., Paprzycki, M., Bianchini, M., Das, S. (eds.) Computationally Intelligent Systems and their Applications. SCI, vol. 950, pp. 39–51. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0407-2_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferree, M.M., Gamson, W.A., Gerhards, J., Rucht, D.: Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory Soc. 31(3), 289–324 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bedi, P., Goyal, S.B., Rajawat, A.S., Shaw, R.N., Ghosh, A.: A framework for personalizing atypical web search sessions with concept-based user profiles using selective machine learning techniques. In: Bianchini, M., Piuri, V., Das, S., Shaw, R.N. (eds.) Advanced Computing and Intelligent Technologies. LNNS, vol. 218, pp. 279–291. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2164-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Fredrickson, B.L.: Positive emotions broaden and build. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 1–53. Elsevier (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hanna, A., Denton, E., Smart, A., Smith-Loud, J.: Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 501–512 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Helberger, N.: On the democratic role of news recommenders. Digital J. 7(8), 993–1012 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rawat, R., Rajawat, A.S., Mahor, V., Shaw, R.N., Ghosh, A.: Dark Web—onion hidden service discovery and crawling for profiling morphing, unstructured crime and vulnerabilities prediction. In: Mekhilef, S., Favorskaya, M., Pandey, R.K., Shaw, R.N. (eds.) Innovations in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. LNEE, vol. 756, pp. 717–734. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0749-3_57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.: Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mahor, V., et.al.: Cyber warfare threat categorization on CPS by dark web terrorist. In: 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON), pp. 1–6 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/GUCON50781.2021.9573994

  23. Jannach, D., Jugovac, M.: Measuring the business value of recommender systems. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 10(4), 1–23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3370082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tandoc Jr, E.C., Thomas, R.J.: The ethics of web analytics. Digital J. 3(2), 243–258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.909122

  25. Kumar, A., Das, S., Tyagi, V., Shaw, R.N., Ghosh, A.: Analysis of classifier algorithms to detect anti-money laundering. In: Bansal, J.C., Paprzycki, M., Bianchini, M., Das, S. (eds.) Computationally Intelligent Systems and their Applications. SCI, vol. 950, pp. 143–152. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0407-2_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Karppinen, K.: Uses of democratic theory in media and communication studies. Observation. 7(3), 1–17 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Keyes, O.: The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interact. 2(CSCW), 1–22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurabh Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, S., Shakya, H.K. (2023). Recommendation Systems for a Group of Users Which Recommend Recent Attention: Using Hybrid Recommendation Model. In: Shaw, R.N., Paprzycki, M., Ghosh, A. (eds) Advanced Communication and Intelligent Systems. ICACIS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1749. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25088-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25088-0_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25087-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25088-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics