Abstract
The objective of this paper is to extend the knowledge of data analytics capabilities and the development process required to implement pay-per-output/-outcome (PPO) business models. To achieve this objective, we conducted qualitative research to study two equipment manufacturing companies in their business model transformation, with a special interest in their data analytics capability development path. The findings were threefold; first we validated the data analytics capabilities necessary for PPO business models synthesised from literature with the selected case companies. Second, two additional data analytics capabilities, namely capability to influence how performance is measured and analysed, and capability to simulate the solution’s financial performance) were identified. Finally, this study presents two different roadmaps on how data analytics capabilities have been developed. The study findings suggest that remote monitoring capability is among the most critical data analytics capability to initiate a PPO business model in the equipment manufacturing industry. This study contributes to business model literature, and information systems literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Menon, K., Kärkkäinen, H., Mittal, S., Wuest, T.: Impact of IIoT based technologies on characteristic features and related options of nonownership business models. In: Fortin, C., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2019. IAICT, vol. 565, pp. 302–312. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_29
Uski, V.M., et al.: Review of PPX business models: adaptability and feasibility of PPX models in the equipment manufacturing industry. In: Canciglieri Junior, O., Noël, F., Rivest, L., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2021, vol. 639, pp. 358–372. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94335-6_26
Grubic, T., Peppard, J.: Servitized manufacturing firms competing through remote monitoring technology: an exploratory study. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 27(2), 154–184 (2016)
Uuskoski, M., Menon, K., Kärkkäinen, H., Koskinen, K.: Perceived risks and benefits of advanced pay-per-use type of business models based on industry 4.0 enabled technologies in manufacturing companies. In: Chiabert, P., Bouras, A., Noël, F., Ríos, J. (eds.) PLM 2018. IAICT, vol. 540, pp. 498–507. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_46
Menon, K., Mittal, S., Kärkkäinen, H., Kuismanen, O.: Systematic steps towards concept design of pay–per-x business models: an exploratory research. In: Canciglieri Junior, O., Noël, F., Rivest, L., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2021, vol. 640, pp. 386–397. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94399-8_28
Schroderus, J., Lasrado, L.A., Menon, K., Kärkkäinen, H.: Towards a pay-per-X maturity model for equipment manufacturing companies. Procedia Comput. Sci. 196, 226–234 (2022)
Gupta, M., George, J.F.: Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Inf. Manag. 53(8), 1049–1064 (2016)
Manresa, A., Prester, J., Bikfalvi, A.: The role of servitization in the capabilities – performance path. CR 31(3), 645–667 (2021)
Khanra, S., Dhir, A., Parida, V., Kohtamäki, M.: Servitization research: a review and bibliometric analysis of past achievements and future promises. J. Bus. Res. 131, 151–166 (2021)
Agostini, L., Nosella, A.: Industry 4.0 and business models: a bibliometric literature review. BPMJ 27(5), 1633–1655 (2021)
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P., Probert, D.R.: Technology roadmapping—a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 71(1–2), 5–26 (2004)
Baines, T., Ziaee Bigdeli, A., Bustinza, O.F., Shi, V.G., Baldwin, J., Ridgway, K.: Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities. IJOPM 37(2), 256–278 (2017)
Adrodegari, F., Alghisi, A., Ardolino, M., Saccani, N.: From ownership to service-oriented business models: a survey in capital goods companies and a PSS typology. Procedia CIRP 30, 245–250 (2015)
Ng, I.C.L., Maull, R., Yip, N.: Outcome-based contracts as a driver for systems thinking and service-dominant logic in service science: evidence from the defence industry. Eur. Manag. J. 27(6), 377–387 (2009)
Liinamaa, J., Viljanen, M., Hurmerinta, A., Ivanova-Gongne, M., Luotola, H., Gustafsson, M.: Performance-based and functional contracting in value-based solution selling. Ind. Mark. Manag. 59, 37–49 (2016)
Möller, H., Shahnavaz, T.: Use-Oriented Business Model for Consumer Durables: an Exploratory Case Study on Business Model Capabilities (2020)
Yang, M., Smart, P., Kumar, M., Jolly, M., Evans, S.: Product-service systems business models for circular supply chains. Prod. Plan. Control 29(6), 498–508 (2018)
Gebauer, H., Saul, C.J., Haldimann, M., Gustafsson, A.: Organizational capabilities for pay-per-use services in product-oriented companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 192, 157–168 (2017)
Qi, Y., Mao, Z., Zhang, M., Guo, H.: Manufacturing practices and servitization: the role of mass customization and product innovation capabilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 228, 107747 (2020)
Andreas Zolnowski, T.B., Schmitt, A.K.: Understanding the impact of remote service technology on service business models in manufacturing: from improving after-sales services to building service ecosystems. In: 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), p. 109 (2011)
Rösler, J., Friedli, T.: A capability model for equipment-as-a-service adoption in manufacturing companies. In: West, S., Meierhofer, J., Ganz, C. (eds.) Smart Services Summit. PI, pp. 59–71. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72090-2_6
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Dyer, W.G., Wilkins, A.L.: Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, p. 8 (1991)
Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. AMJ 50(1), 25–32 (2007)
Wu, S.J., Melnyk, S.A., Flynn, B.B.: Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient: operational capabilities. Decis. Sci. 41(4), 721–754 (2010)
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by Business Finland BF/Future Spaces.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kukkamalla, P.K., Uski, VM., Kuismanen, O., Kärkkäinen, H., Menon, K. (2023). Data Analytics Capability Roadmap for PPO Business Models in Equipment Manufacturing Companies. In: Noël, F., Nyffenegger, F., Rivest, L., Bouras, A. (eds) Product Lifecycle Management. PLM in Transition Times: The Place of Humans and Transformative Technologies. PLM 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 667. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25181-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25182-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)