Abstract
Process discovery is one of the most challenging tasks in process mining. Based on event data, a process discovery approach generates a process model that captures the behavior recorded in the data. The hybrid miner is a two-step process discovery approach that creates a balance between the advantages of formal modeling and the necessity of remaining informal for vague structures. In the first discovery step, an informal causal graph is constructed based on direct succession dependencies between activities. In the second discovery step, the hybrid miner tries to convert the discovered dependencies into formal constraints. For vague structures where formal constraints cannot be justified, dependencies are depicted informally. In this paper, we reduce the representational bias of the hybrid miner by exploiting causal graph metrics to mine for long-term dependencies. Our evaluation shows that the proposed approach leads to the discovery of more precise models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In all examples in this paper, we assume that all traces in any event log start with the activity “start" and end with the activity “end" without explicitly mentioning them.
- 2.
For all examples and experiments in this paper, we use \({t_{ R_{W} } = 1}\) to deactivate the detection of uncertain edges because these edges are out of the scope of this paper.
- 3.
A new plugin “Extended Causal Graph Miner" has been implemented in ProM [13] to support the approach introduced in this paper.
- 4.
In order to apply conformance checking techniques, hybrid Petri nets are transformed into standard Petri nets by simply removing all informal arcs.
References
Carmona, J., van Dongen, B., Solti, A., Weidlich, M.: Conformance Checking - Relating Processes and Models. Springer, Cham (2018)
Dees, M., van Dongen, B.: BPI Challenge 2016: Clicks Logged In (2016)
Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Loser, K.U., Moysich, K.: Semistructured models are surprisingly useful for user-centered design. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Designing Cooperative Systems, pp. 159–174. IOS Press (2000)
Herrmann, T., Loser, K.-U.: Vagueness in models of socio-technical systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 18(5), 313–323 (1999)
Reijers, H.A., Slaats, T., Stahl, C.: Declarative modeling–an academic dream or the future for BPM? In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 307–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_26
Wil, M.P., van der Aalst, W.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham (2016)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., De Masellis, R., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C.: Learning hybrid process models from events. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 59–76. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_4
Van Dongen, B.: Real-life event logs - Hospital log (2011)
Van Dongen, B.: BPI Challenge 2012 (2012)
Van Dongen, B.: BPI Challenge 2014 (2014)
Van Dongen, B.: BPI Challenge 2015 (2015)
Van Dongen, B.: BPI Challenge 2017 (2017)
van Dongen, B.F., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Verbeek, H.M.W., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The ProM framework: a new era in process mining tool support. In: Ciardo, G., Darondeau, P. (eds.) ICATPN 2005. LNCS, vol. 3536, pp. 444–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11494744_25
Weijters, A.J.M.M., Ribeiro, J.T.S.: Flexible heuristics miner (FHM). In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, CIDM 2011, part of the IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence 2011, pp. 310–317. IEEE (2011)
Weijters, A.J., Van der Aalst, W.M.: Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data using little thumb. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 10(2), 151–162 (2003)
Wen, L., Van Der Aalst, W.M., Wang, J., Sun, J.: Mining process models with non-free-choice constructs. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 15(2), 145–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-007-0065-y
Westergaard, M., Slaats, T.: Mixing paradigms for more comprehensible models. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 283–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kourani, H., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., van der Aalst, W., van Zelst, S. (2023). Mining for Long-Term Dependencies in Causal Graphs. In: Cabanillas, C., Garmann-Johnsen, N.F., Koschmider, A. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 460. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25383-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25383-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25382-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25383-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)