Skip to main content

Design-Time Support for Fragment-Based Case Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2022)

Abstract

Modeling business processes can be difficult, especially if they are flexible and the models consist of many interconnected parts. This is the case for hybrid process modeling approaches, such as fragment-based case management. Also, erroneous and low-quality models have adverse effects on the whole BPM lifecycle. To support creating fragment-based case models, we provide a set of guidelines and integrate them into a modeling tool called fcm-js. Our evaluation shows that fcm-js improves the quality of the process model as well as the user experience during modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The guidelines are published on GitHub: https://github.com/bptlab/fCM-design-support/wiki.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/bptlab/fCM-design-support/wiki/Fragments#f6.

  3. 3.

    We use the example use case of criminal justice to provide examples for the guidelines: https://github.com/bptlab/fCM-design-support/wiki/Example-Use-Case---Criminal-Justice.

  4. 4.

    Repository with source code and screencast at https://github.com/bptlab/fCM-design-support.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/bpmn-io/diagram-js.

  6. 6.

    https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js.

  7. 7.

    https://forms.gle/MvJckrJ71zw59CJ6A.

References

  1. Avila, D.T., dos Santos, R.I., Mendling, J., Thom, L.H.: A systematic literature review of process modeling guidelines and their empirical support. Bus. Process. Manage. J. 27(1), 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corradini, F., et al.: A guidelines framework for understandable BPMN models. Data Knowl. Eng. 113, 129–154 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Estañol, M., Sancho, M.-R., Teniente, E.: Verification and validation of UML artifact-centric business process models. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 434–449. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, T.R.G., Petre, M.: Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 7(2), 131–174 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jvlc.1996.0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haarmann, S., Montali, M., Weske, M.: Refining case models using cardinality constraints. In: La Rosa, M., Sadiq, S., Teniente, E. (eds.) CAiSE 2021. LNCS, vol. 12751, pp. 296–310. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79382-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Haarmann, S., Weske, M.: Correlating data objects in fragment-based case management. In: Abramowicz, W., Klein, G. (eds.) BIS 2020. LNBIP, vol. 389, pp. 197–209. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53337-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasic, F., Smedt, J.D., Vanthienen, J.: Augmenting processes with decision intelligence: principles for integrated modelling. Decis. Support Syst. 107, 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Hee, K., Serebrenik, A., Sidorova, N., Voorhoeve, M., van der Werf, J.M.: Modelling with history-dependent petri nets. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 320–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewelt, M., Pufahl, L., Mandal, S., Wolff, F., Weske, M.: Toward a methodology for case modeling. Softw. Syst. Model. 19(6), 1367–1393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00766-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hewelt, M., Weske, M.: A hybrid approach for flexible case modeling and execution. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 260, pp. 38–54. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunze, M., Weske, M.: Signavio-oryx academic initiative. In: Proceedings of the Business Process Management 2010 Demonstration Track, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 14–16 September 2010. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 615. CEUR-WS.org (2010). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-615/paper6.pdf

  13. Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Günther, O.: Learning from quality issues of BPMN models from industry. EMISA Forum 36(2), 120–123 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. López, H.A., Debois, S., Hildebrandt, T.T., Marquard, M.: The process highlighter: from texts to declarative processes and back. In: Proceedings of the Dissertation Award, Demonstration, and Industrial Track at BPM 2018, Sydney, Australia, 9–14 September 2018, pp. 66–70 (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2196/BPM_2018_paper_14.pdf

  15. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(2), 127–136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno-Montes de Oca, I., Snoeck, M.: Pragmatic guidelines for business process modeling (2014). Available at SSRN 2592983

    Google Scholar 

  17. OMG: Business process model and notation BPMN v. 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Snoeck, M.: Enterprise Information Systems Engineering - The MERODE Approach. The Enterprise Engineering Series, Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10145-3

  19. Steinau, S., Andrews, K., Reichert, M.: A modeling tool for PHILharmonicFlows objects and lifecycle processes. In: Proceedings of the BPM Demo Track and BPM Dissertation Award 2017, Barcelona, Spain, 13 September 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1920. CEUR-WS.org (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1920/BPM_2017_paper_196.pdf

  20. Weske, M.: Business Process Management - Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 3rd edn. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59432-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leon Bein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Andree, K. et al. (2023). Design-Time Support for Fragment-Based Case Management. In: Cabanillas, C., Garmann-Johnsen, N.F., Koschmider, A. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 460. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25383-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25383-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25382-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25383-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics