Skip to main content

A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Delegation Incentives in Blockchain Governance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology (DPM 2022, CBT 2022)

Abstract

The paper presents a mathematical description of the vote delegation incentive process for funding proposals in a decentralized governance system using a blockchain-based voting. Two models of bribing a delegate by a proposer submitting proposals for funding are considered: “Rational Delegates” and “Emotional Delegates”. In terms of parameters describing the voting process, a sufficient condition for a Nash equilibrium is found to be as follows: if both a proposer and a delegate do not intend to participate in bribery. Moreover, it is shown at what share of the briber’s stake this condition is satisfied. The main practical result of the paper is the possibility to define what kind of an attacker (in terms of the bribing capability) we will be able to resist under certain parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Understanding dash governance (2021). https://docs.dash.org/en/stable/governance/understanding.html

  2. Create, fund and deliver the future of cardano (2022). https://cardano.ideascale.com/

  3. Fund your project with catalyst (2022). https://developers.cardano.org/docs/governance/project-catalyst

  4. Allombert, V., Bourgoin, M., Tesson, J.: Introduction to the tezos blockchain. In: 2019 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balogun, H.O.: Towards sustainable blockchains: cryptocurrency treasury and general decision-making systems with provably secure delegable blockchain-based voting. Lancaster University (United Kingdom) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birmpas, G., Kovalchuk, L., Lazos, P., Oliynykov, R.: Parallel contests for crowdsourcing reviews: existence and quality of equilibria. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04064 (2022)

  7. Brandt, F., Sandholm, T.: Decentralized voting with unconditional privacy. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 357–364 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Procaccia, A.D.: Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dal Bó, E., Dal Bó, P., Di Tella, R.: “plata o plomo?”: bribe and punishment in a theory of political influence. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 100(1), 41–53 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jafar, U., Aziz, M.J.A., Shukur, Z.: Blockchain for electronic voting system - review and open research challenges. Sensors 21(17) (2021). https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/17/5874. ISSN 1424–8220

  11. Jairam, S., Gordijn, J., da Silva Torres, I., Kaya, F., Makkes, M.: A decentralized fair governance model for permissionless blockchain systems. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Value Modelling and Business Ontologies, pp. 4–5 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaidalov, D., Kovalchuk, L., Nastenko, A., Rodinko, M., Shevtsov, O., Oliynykov, R.: Ethereum classic treasury system proposal. IOHK RESEARCH REPORT (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kiayias, A., Lazos, P.: SoK: blockchain governance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07188 (2022)

  14. Kurbatov, O., et al.: Anonymous decentralized e-voting system. In: CMiGIN, pp. 12–22 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lianju, S., Luyan, P.: Game theory analysis of the bribery behavior. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(8) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liebkind, J.: How blockchain technology can prevent voter fraud, December 2020. https://www.investopedia.com/news/how-blockchain-technology-can-prevent-voter-fraud/

  17. Zhang, B., Oliynykov, R., Balogun, R.: A treasury system for cryptocurrencies: enabling better collaborative intelligence. Cryptology ePrint Archive (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank Philip Lazos for fruitful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariia Rodinko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kovalchuk, L., Rodinko, M., Oliynykov, R. (2023). A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Delegation Incentives in Blockchain Governance. In: Garcia-Alfaro, J., Navarro-Arribas, G., Dragoni, N. (eds) Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology. DPM CBT 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13619. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25734-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25734-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25733-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25734-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics