Skip to main content

Robot as Embodied Agent? A Phenomenological Critique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2022 Collocated Workshops (SEFM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13765))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The problem of embodiment recurs several times in the contemporary debate in diverse disciplines, such as philosophy, neuroscience, and robotics. In particular, it is possible to define robots as (physical) embodied AI (Artificial Intelligence). From a philosophical point of view, this description opens a series of problems, such as: is the robotics embodiment comparable to the human one? In this paper, I will dig into this question by analyzing the robotics body compared with Embodied Cognition and the phenomenological tradition. Specifically, I will use the distinction between Körper and Leib as an epistemological pathway to dig into robotics. This essay wants to prove that the composite nature of the notion of the body, highlighted by phenomenology, is able to interpret the potentialities and limitations of robotics systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    the growing trend is also confirmed by the International Federation of Robotics (https://ifr.org/free-downloads).

  2. 2.

    Robot is defined as “(1)a machine equipped with sensing instruments for detecting input signals or environmental conditions, but with reacting or guidance mechanisms that can perform sensing, calculations, and so on, and with stored programs for resultant actions; for example, a machine running itself; (2) a mechanical unit that can be programmed to perform some task of manipulation or locomotion under automatic control” [10].

  3. 3.

    He defines the robots as “a smart machine that does routine, repetitive, hazardous mechanical tasks, or performs other operations either under direct human command and control or on its own, using a computer with embedded software (which contains previously loaded commands and instructions) or with an advanced level of machine (artificial) intelligence (which bases decisions and actions on data gathered by the robot about its current environment)” [11].

  4. 4.

    https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines.

  5. 5.

    Ziemke identifies six notions of embodiment, 1. structural coupling, 2. historical embodiment, 3. physical embodiment, 4. organismoid embodiment, 5. organismic embodiment, and 6. social embodiment [20].

  6. 6.

    In this sense, it is possible to recognize the importance of”having a body” for robotics [13].

  7. 7.

    In 1998, Kerstin Dautenhahn affirms “Life and intelligence only develops inside a body” [18].

  8. 8.

    see also [19,20,21, 23].

  9. 9.

    Other researchers argue that “There is no known law of nature that forbids the existence of subjective feelings in artifacts designed or evolved by humans” [29].

References

  1. Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.: The challenge of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment for cognitive science. The intersections of nature and culture, Perspectives on embodiment, pp. 103–120 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro, L.: Embodied Cognition. Routledge, Milton Park (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, Milton Park (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The embodied mind, revised edition: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Sandini, G., Metta, G., Vernon, D.: The iCub cognitive humanoid robot: an open-system research platform for enactive cognition. In: Lungarella, M., Iida, F., Bongard, J., Pfeifer, R. (eds.) 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4850, pp. 358–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77296-5_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Vernon, D., Metta, G., Sandini, G.: The icub cognitive architecture: interactive development in a humanoid robot. In: 2007 IEEE 6th International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson, E.: Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gates, B.: A robot in every home. Sci. Am. 296(1), 58–65 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mataric, M.J.: The Robotics Primer. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenberg, J.M.: Dictionary of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Angelo, J.A.: Robotics: A Reference Guide to the New Technology. Greenwood Press, Westport (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bertolini, A.: Robots as products: the case for a realistic analysis of robotic applications and liability rules. Law Innov. Technol. 5(2), 214–247 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. De Vignemont, F.: Habeas corpus: the sense of ownership of one’s own body. Mind Lang. 22(4), 427–449 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thelen, E., Smith, L.B.: A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Damasio, A.R.: Descartes’ Error. Random House, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47(1–3), 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Dautenhahn, K.: Embodiment and interaction in socially intelligent life-like agents. In: Nehaniv, C.L. (ed.) CMAA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1562, pp. 102–141. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48834-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziemke, T.: What’s Life Got to Do with It. Artificial Consciousness, pp. 48–66 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ziemke, T.: What’s that thing called embodiment?. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 25, no. 25 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ziemke, T.: The body of knowledge: on the role of the living body in grounding embodied cognition. Biosystems 148, 4–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Giannotta, A.P.: Corpo funzionale e corpo senziente. La tesi forte del carattere incarnato della mente in fenomenologia. Riv. Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 13(1), 41–56 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Di Paolo, E.A.: Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. Dyn. Syst. Approach Embodiment Soc. 19–42 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Damiano, L., Stano, P.: Synthetic biology and artificial intelligence. grounding a cross-disciplinary approach to the synthetic exploration of (embodied) cognition. Complex Syst. 27, 199–228 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanfredini, R.: The mind–body problem in husserl and merleau-ponty. In: Reboul, A. (ed.) Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, pp. 471–482. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zipoli Caiani, S.: Mindsets. Conceiving Cognition in Nature. Mimesis International (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Husserl, E.: Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book studies in the phenomenology of constitution, vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Metzinger, T.: The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. Basic Books (AZ) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chella, A., Manzotti, R.: Artificial Consciousness. Andrews UK Limited, Luton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Corti, L.: Towards a quanto-qualitative biological engineering: the case of the neuroprosthetic hand. In: The Quantification of Bodies in Health: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Emerald Publishing Limited (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Corti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Corti, L. (2023). Robot as Embodied Agent? A Phenomenological Critique. In: Masci, P., Bernardeschi, C., Graziani, P., Koddenbrock, M., Palmieri, M. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2022 Collocated Workshops. SEFM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26236-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26236-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26235-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26236-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics