Abstract
The problem of embodiment recurs several times in the contemporary debate in diverse disciplines, such as philosophy, neuroscience, and robotics. In particular, it is possible to define robots as (physical) embodied AI (Artificial Intelligence). From a philosophical point of view, this description opens a series of problems, such as: is the robotics embodiment comparable to the human one? In this paper, I will dig into this question by analyzing the robotics body compared with Embodied Cognition and the phenomenological tradition. Specifically, I will use the distinction between Körper and Leib as an epistemological pathway to dig into robotics. This essay wants to prove that the composite nature of the notion of the body, highlighted by phenomenology, is able to interpret the potentialities and limitations of robotics systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
the growing trend is also confirmed by the International Federation of Robotics (https://ifr.org/free-downloads).
- 2.
Robot is defined as “(1)a machine equipped with sensing instruments for detecting input signals or environmental conditions, but with reacting or guidance mechanisms that can perform sensing, calculations, and so on, and with stored programs for resultant actions; for example, a machine running itself; (2) a mechanical unit that can be programmed to perform some task of manipulation or locomotion under automatic control” [10].
- 3.
He defines the robots as “a smart machine that does routine, repetitive, hazardous mechanical tasks, or performs other operations either under direct human command and control or on its own, using a computer with embedded software (which contains previously loaded commands and instructions) or with an advanced level of machine (artificial) intelligence (which bases decisions and actions on data gathered by the robot about its current environment)” [11].
- 4.
- 5.
Ziemke identifies six notions of embodiment, 1. structural coupling, 2. historical embodiment, 3. physical embodiment, 4. organismoid embodiment, 5. organismic embodiment, and 6. social embodiment [20].
- 6.
In this sense, it is possible to recognize the importance of”having a body” for robotics [13].
- 7.
In 1998, Kerstin Dautenhahn affirms “Life and intelligence only develops inside a body” [18].
- 8.
- 9.
Other researchers argue that “There is no known law of nature that forbids the existence of subjective feelings in artifacts designed or evolved by humans” [29].
References
Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.: The challenge of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment for cognitive science. The intersections of nature and culture, Perspectives on embodiment, pp. 103–120 (1999)
Shapiro, L.: Embodied Cognition. Routledge, Milton Park (2010)
Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, Milton Park (2013)
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The embodied mind, revised edition: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)
Sandini, G., Metta, G., Vernon, D.: The iCub cognitive humanoid robot: an open-system research platform for enactive cognition. In: Lungarella, M., Iida, F., Bongard, J., Pfeifer, R. (eds.) 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4850, pp. 358–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77296-5_32
Vernon, D., Metta, G., Sandini, G.: The icub cognitive architecture: interactive development in a humanoid robot. In: 2007 IEEE 6th International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE (2007)
Thompson, E.: Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Gates, B.: A robot in every home. Sci. Am. 296(1), 58–65 (2007)
Mataric, M.J.: The Robotics Primer. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)
Rosenberg, J.M.: Dictionary of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1986)
Angelo, J.A.: Robotics: A Reference Guide to the New Technology. Greenwood Press, Westport (2007)
Bertolini, A.: Robots as products: the case for a realistic analysis of robotic applications and liability rules. Law Innov. Technol. 5(2), 214–247 (2013)
De Vignemont, F.: Habeas corpus: the sense of ownership of one’s own body. Mind Lang. 22(4), 427–449 (2007)
Thelen, E., Smith, L.B.: A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT press, Cambridge (1994)
Damasio, A.R.: Descartes’ Error. Random House, New York (2006)
Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47(1–3), 139–159 (1991)
Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT press, Cambridge (2006)
Dautenhahn, K.: Embodiment and interaction in socially intelligent life-like agents. In: Nehaniv, C.L. (ed.) CMAA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1562, pp. 102–141. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48834-0_7
Ziemke, T.: What’s Life Got to Do with It. Artificial Consciousness, pp. 48–66 (2007)
Ziemke, T.: What’s that thing called embodiment?. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 25, no. 25 (2003)
Ziemke, T.: The body of knowledge: on the role of the living body in grounding embodied cognition. Biosystems 148, 4–11 (2016)
Giannotta, A.P.: Corpo funzionale e corpo senziente. La tesi forte del carattere incarnato della mente in fenomenologia. Riv. Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 13(1), 41–56 (2022)
Di Paolo, E.A.: Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. Dyn. Syst. Approach Embodiment Soc. 19–42 (2003)
Damiano, L., Stano, P.: Synthetic biology and artificial intelligence. grounding a cross-disciplinary approach to the synthetic exploration of (embodied) cognition. Complex Syst. 27, 199–228 (2018)
Lanfredini, R.: The mind–body problem in husserl and merleau-ponty. In: Reboul, A. (ed.) Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, pp. 471–482. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_31
Zipoli Caiani, S.: Mindsets. Conceiving Cognition in Nature. Mimesis International (2014)
Husserl, E.: Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book studies in the phenomenology of constitution, vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (1989)
Metzinger, T.: The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. Basic Books (AZ) (2009)
Chella, A., Manzotti, R.: Artificial Consciousness. Andrews UK Limited, Luton (2013)
Corti, L.: Towards a quanto-qualitative biological engineering: the case of the neuroprosthetic hand. In: The Quantification of Bodies in Health: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Emerald Publishing Limited (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Corti, L. (2023). Robot as Embodied Agent? A Phenomenological Critique. In: Masci, P., Bernardeschi, C., Graziani, P., Koddenbrock, M., Palmieri, M. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2022 Collocated Workshops. SEFM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26236-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26236-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26235-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26236-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)